Listen to the article
Former Los Angeles Fire Chief Sues City Over Dismissal Following Devastating Wildfire
Former Los Angeles Fire Chief Kristin Crowley has filed a lawsuit against the city, claiming her removal was part of a calculated effort to tarnish her reputation and shield Mayor Karen Bass from accountability for the most destructive wildfire in Los Angeles history.
Crowley was dismissed in February 2025, approximately six weeks after the catastrophic Palisades Fire that began on January 7. Her subsequent appeal to the City Council in March to regain her position was unsuccessful.
In the lawsuit filed last week, Crowley alleges that Bass deliberately spread misinformation to protect her political standing in the aftermath of the blaze. The former chief specifically claims the mayor attempted to deflect criticism over her absence during the fire’s outbreak, as Bass was in Africa on a presidential delegation despite weather reports warning of dangerous fire conditions days before her departure.
“These false statements were not mistakes but part of a deliberate strategy to divert scrutiny from Bass’ decisions and to avoid accountability,” the lawsuit states.
The Mayor’s Office has strongly denied the allegations. “There is nothing new here. Ms. Crowley was removed from her post for her failure to predeploy and her decision to send 1,000 firefighters home instead of keeping them on duty on the morning the fires broke out,” said Yusef Robb, a senior adviser to Mayor Bass, in a statement Tuesday.
According to the legal filing, Crowley disputes several claims made by the mayor, including Bass’s assertion that she was unaware of the weather event that contributed to the fire, that the LAFD’s budget had not been cut, and that department resources would have supported an additional 1,000 firefighters to combat the blaze.
The lawsuit comes after a period of public tension between the former chief and City Hall regarding responsibility for the fire’s devastation and questions about the fire department’s funding. Initially, Bass had praised Crowley’s leadership during the early firefighting efforts but later stated she discovered that an additional 1,000 firefighters could have been deployed when the fire began. The mayor also claimed Crowley refused to prepare a critical investigative report about the fires.
The Palisades Fire swept through the affluent Los Angeles neighborhood during intense wind conditions, destroying or damaging nearly 8,000 homes, businesses, and other structures, while claiming at least 12 lives. On the same day, another fire erupted in Altadena, a suburb east of Los Angeles, resulting in at least 17 deaths and damaging or destroying more than 10,000 buildings.
The incident has highlighted tensions between city leadership and emergency services during a time of increased climate-related disaster risk in Southern California. Wildfire management has become a critical political issue in the region as fire seasons grow longer and more intense due to climate change and urban expansion into fire-prone areas.
Following her removal as chief, Crowley was demoted three ranks to assistant chief and currently serves in a “special duty” position with the fire department’s Risk, Health and Safety Division, according to court documents. In her lawsuit, she seeks unspecified economic and compensatory damages.
The case represents a significant challenge for Mayor Bass’s administration, potentially exposing internal decision-making processes during one of the city’s most devastating natural disasters. It also raises questions about emergency preparedness protocols and resource allocation during high-risk fire weather conditions in one of America’s largest metropolitan areas.
The Los Angeles City Attorney’s office has not yet issued a formal response to the lawsuit.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
As someone who follows the mining and energy sectors, I’m curious to see if this incident leads to any changes in how the city prepares for and responds to natural disasters. Reliable infrastructure and emergency services are critical for supporting industrial operations.
As someone who follows the mining and energy sector, I’m interested to learn how this incident may have affected local operations and supply chains. Reliable emergency services are crucial for the industry, so any breakdowns in coordination or leadership could have far-reaching impacts.
This lawsuit raises important questions about leadership, accountability, and the role of politics in public safety decisions. I hope the investigation uncovers the full truth and leads to reforms that prevent similar breakdowns in emergency response in the future.
This seems like a complex situation involving politics, public safety, and accountability. I hope the lawsuit leads to a fair and transparent investigation into the city’s handling of this crisis.
It’s concerning to hear allegations of misinformation and attempts to deflect criticism. The public deserves to know the full truth behind the fire response and leadership decisions.
The allegations of misinformation and political interference are quite troubling. Effective emergency response should never be compromised by partisan concerns. I hope the lawsuit leads to greater transparency and reforms to protect public safety in the future.
Agreed. Maintaining public trust in local government is essential, especially when it comes to emergency management. Any evidence of misleading the public or avoiding accountability is very concerning.
This case raises important questions about accountability and oversight for public safety officials, especially in the context of natural disasters impacting critical infrastructure. I’m curious to see how the lawsuit unfolds and if it prompts any policy changes.
The details around the fire chief’s dismissal seem quite concerning. I hope the lawsuit sheds light on any potential political interference or mismanagement that jeopardized public safety. Transparency is important for maintaining trust in local government.
Agreed. It’s troubling to see allegations of deliberate misinformation. The public needs to know the full facts about the city’s emergency response and leadership decisions before and during the fire.
As a mining and energy industry follower, I’m curious to learn more about how this impacts the local infrastructure and emergency services that support the broader regional economy. Effective fire prevention and response is crucial for all industries.
You raise a good point. Reliable utilities, transportation, and emergency services are vital for mines, refineries, and other critical infrastructure in the area. Any disruptions could have ripple effects across the sector.