Listen to the article
In a world where CEO departures send stock prices swinging wildly, the global drug trade operates under an entirely different set of economic principles. The recent killing of one of the world’s most notorious drug lords has once again demonstrated the peculiar resilience of illegal narcotics markets.
Mexican authorities announced this weekend they had killed Nemesio Rubén Oseguera Cervantes, better known as “El Mencho,” the powerful leader of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel. Despite his significance in the global drug trade, experts predict his death will have minimal impact on drug prices and availability.
This counterintuitive market stability has baffled economists and law enforcement officials for decades. The death or capture of major drug lords like El Mencho rarely produces the market disruptions that basic economic theory would predict.
“The resilience of drug prices in the face of major supply chain disruptions challenges conventional economic wisdom,” explains Dr. Maria Velez, an economist specializing in black markets at Georgetown University. “In legitimate markets, when you remove a CEO or disrupt production, prices typically fluctuate significantly.”
As detailed in Tom Wainwright’s influential analysis “Narconomics: How to Run a Drug Cartel,” these criminal enterprises have evolved organizational structures that more closely resemble multinational corporations than traditional crime families. Their decentralized operations allow them to quickly replace leadership, protect distribution networks, and maintain business continuity despite high-profile arrests or deaths.
“Cartels have built redundancy into every level of their operations,” says former DEA agent Robert Almonte. “When one leader falls, three more are ready to step in. The organization is designed to survive its founders.”
El Mencho’s death comes just years after the capture of Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán of the rival Sinaloa Cartel. Yet despite these high-profile removals, cocaine prices across North America have remained remarkably stable over the past decade, adjusted for inflation.
A key factor in this stability lies at the beginning of the supply chain. Unlike traditional businesses where suppliers can negotiate with multiple buyers, coca farmers in Colombia, Peru and Bolivia typically face monopolistic conditions. In coca-growing regions, prolonged violence has often left a single trafficking group in control of local purchasing.
“That group becomes the sole local buyer of coca leaf, so it dictates the price,” Wainwright explains in his analysis. This market dominance allows cartels to squeeze suppliers rather than raising prices for consumers when facing operational challenges.
When law enforcement pressure increases, cartels simply push the financial burden down to vulnerable farmers. “Just as big retailers protect themselves and their customers from price rises by forcing suppliers to take the hit, cartels keep their own costs down at the expense of coca farmers,” Wainwright notes.
The farmers, lacking alternative markets for their crops and often facing threats of violence, have little choice but to accept lower payments. This creates a perverse economic buffer that insulates consumers and maintains cartel profits despite disruptions.
Security analyst Carlos Mendoza, who specializes in Latin American organized crime, points out another factor: market diversification. “The Jalisco Cartel isn’t just in cocaine. They traffic methamphetamine, fentanyl, marijuana, and have legitimate business fronts. Losing one leader doesn’t collapse this diversified portfolio.”
The region surrounding Jalisco has already seen increased violence following El Mencho’s death, with at least seven police officers killed in apparent retribution attacks. Yet the actual business of drug trafficking is expected to continue with minimal disruption.
This pattern repeats a troubling lesson from decades of drug enforcement efforts: targeting individual leaders, while symbolically important, rarely disrupts the underlying market fundamentals that drive the drug trade.
“Killing kingpins can change the leadership chart,” says former U.S. drug policy advisor Jonathan Wilson, “but it doesn’t dismantle the economic incentives or the supply chain infrastructure that keeps these markets stable. The business model is simply too resilient.”
As Mexican authorities celebrate the removal of El Mencho, history suggests the impact on drug availability and pricing will likely be negligible, challenging policymakers to reconsider approaches that focus on market dynamics rather than individual targets.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
Fascinating that the drug trade seems to operate by its own economic rules, defying conventional wisdom. I wonder what enables such resilience in the face of major supply disruptions. Seems like a complex system with deep societal roots.
You’re right, it is quite intriguing. Likely a combination of well-established distribution networks, high profit margins, and the sheer scale and decentralized nature of the global drug trade.
The resilience of the drug trade is certainly puzzling from an economic standpoint. I imagine the vast sums of money involved, global reach, and high demand provide a strong buffer against the loss of individual players. An unregulated black market plays by its own rules.
Agreed, the economic incentives and entrenched nature of the drug trade seem to make it highly resistant to disruption, even with high-profile arrests. The profit potential is just too great.
Interesting that even the death of a major cartel leader has little impact on drug prices and availability. Speaks to the deep institutional knowledge and infrastructure that underpins the global drug trade. A sobering reminder of its scale and resilience.
The drug trade’s ability to withstand the removal of key figures is truly remarkable from an economic standpoint. It highlights the complexity and adaptability of these criminal networks. Tackling the core drivers and incentives may be more effective than targeting individuals.
Absolutely, going after the individual players doesn’t seem to address the systemic issues that enable the drug trade to persist. A more holistic, societal approach targeting the underlying drivers could be more impactful.
This article raises some fascinating questions about the economics of the global drug trade. The ability of cartels to maintain price and supply stability despite high-profile arrests defies conventional market theory. There are clearly deep-rooted structural factors at play.