Listen to the article
In a significant development highlighting tensions between federal immigration authorities and New York City leadership, the Department of Homeland Security has revealed that a recently arrested New York City Council employee is an unauthorized immigrant with a prior criminal record.
DHS officials identified Rafael Andres Rubio Bohorquez, 53, as a Venezuelan national who entered the United States on a B2 tourist visa in 2017 but remained in the country after his visa expired that same year. According to federal authorities, Bohorquez had no legal authorization to work in the United States, despite having been employed as a data analyst by the New York City Council for approximately one year.
The arrest has sparked a heated political confrontation between federal immigration officials and city leadership. New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani expressed outrage over the detention, calling it “an assault on our democracy, on our city, and our values” in a statement posted on social media. Mamdani demanded Bohorquez’s immediate release following his detention during what was described as a routine immigration appointment in Nassau County.
New York City Council Speaker Julie Menin reinforced this position during a press conference, claiming Bohorquez had been cleared to remain in the U.S. until October 2026. “He was a city council employee who is doing everything right. He went to the court when he was asked,” Menin stated, adding that DHS provided no justification for the detention.
However, DHS officials presented a starkly different characterization of the situation. Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin described the employment of “a criminal illegal alien with no authorization” by the New York City Council as “shocking,” suggesting it takes the concept of a “sanctuary city to a whole new level.”
Federal authorities also disclosed that Bohorquez has a prior arrest for assault in New York, though details about the case were not provided. “Under President Trump and Secretary Noem, the United States is no longer a safe haven for criminals,” McLaughlin stated, emphasizing the administration’s immigration enforcement priorities.
The case highlights the deepening divide between federal immigration policies and those of sanctuary jurisdictions like New York City, which limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. New York Attorney General Letitia James joined city officials in condemning the arrest, stating, “We will not stand for attacks on our city, its public servants, and its residents.”
This incident occurs against a backdrop of intensified immigration enforcement nationwide under the Trump administration. DHS has recently demanded that New York officials take action over the city’s refusal to honor ICE detainers, reflecting broader tensions between federal and local authorities on immigration matters.
The city council has maintained that Bohorquez worked as a data analyst, though questions have emerged about the vetting process for city employees following DHS’s revelation that he lacked proper work authorization.
For New York City, which has positioned itself as a sanctuary for immigrants, the case represents a significant challenge to its policies. Mayor Mamdani, who took office in January 2026 as the city’s first socialist mayor, has been vocal in his opposition to aggressive immigration enforcement tactics.
The confrontation underscores the complex interplay between federal immigration enforcement priorities and local governance in major metropolitan areas, with immigrants caught in the middle of these competing jurisdictional interests. As the case unfolds, it will likely fuel ongoing national debates about immigration policy, sanctuary jurisdictions, and the appropriate balance between federal and local authority.
Neither Mayor Mamdani nor the New York City Council had responded to requests for additional comment at the time of reporting.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
This appears to be a complex case with valid concerns on both sides. I’m curious to learn more about the specific circumstances and any potential mitigating factors before forming a firm opinion.
Agreed, there are likely nuances that aren’t being fully captured in the initial coverage. A more in-depth, balanced analysis would be helpful to understand the situation more thoroughly.
Immigration policy is a sensitive and divisive topic. While the legal status of the council employee is concerning, the city’s response also raises important questions about civil liberties and the role of federal authorities. This warrants a thoughtful, measured discussion.
Absolutely. Striking the right balance between enforcing immigration laws and upholding democratic principles is crucial. I hope this leads to constructive dialogue rather than further escalation.
The revelation of the council employee’s immigration status is certainly newsworthy, but the tone and framing of the reporting seem quite charged. I would encourage looking at this from multiple angles to understand the full context.
This seems like a complex situation with conflicting interests at play. I’d be curious to learn more about the full context and perspectives from all sides before drawing any conclusions.
Agreed, there are likely nuances here that aren’t being fully captured in the initial reporting. It will be important to get a balanced understanding of the issues involved.
While the employee’s immigration status is concerning, the city’s response also raises important questions about civil liberties and the appropriate role of federal authorities. This warrants a thoughtful, fact-based discussion.