Listen to the article
The Department of Homeland Security announced Tuesday it has achieved “historic progress” under President Donald Trump and Secretary Kristi Noem, citing nearly 3 million illegal immigrants who have departed the United States in the past 13 months. The announcement, timed with Trump’s first State of the Union address since returning to office, painted a picture of what officials described as “the most secure border in American history.”
According to DHS figures, an estimated 2.2 million self-deportations have occurred alongside more than 713,000 formal deportations during this period. Secretary Noem emphasized the dramatic reduction in border crossings, stating that total apprehensions under the current administration have been lower than what was recorded in a single month during the previous Biden administration.
“Countless lives have been saved, communities have been strengthened, and the American people have been put first again,” Noem said in her statement.
The department claims these immigration enforcement efforts have generated substantial taxpayer savings, exceeding $13.2 billion. Officials also highlighted enhanced national security operations, reporting that Immigration and Customs Enforcement has arrested and removed more than 1,500 known or suspected terrorists over the past year.
Nationwide immigration operations have resulted in nearly 8,000 gang-related arrests, including members of notorious criminal organizations such as Tren de Aragua and MS-13. In an effort to increase transparency around these operations, DHS launched a new “Worst of the Worst” web page that tracks criminal illegal immigrants arrested during federal enforcement operations.
Drug interdiction has also intensified, according to the department. Customs and Border Protection reportedly seized 617,648 pounds of illicit drugs nationwide over the past year—an 8% increase compared to the previous 12-month period. The Coast Guard contributed significantly to these efforts, intercepting approximately 550,000 pounds of illegal narcotics valued at more than $3.9 billion through counter-drug operations, preventing an estimated 206 million lethal doses from reaching American communities.
The administration has placed particular emphasis on addressing the situation of unaccompanied minors who entered the country during the previous administration. DHS reported that, working in conjunction with the Department of Health and Human Services, they have located 145,000 unaccompanied children who were “lost” under the Biden administration.
“Too many of these children were exploited and abused before, during, and after being trafficked over our borders,” the department stated, underscoring the humanitarian concerns that have driven this aspect of their enforcement agenda.
The announcement comes amid rising tensions on Capitol Hill, where Senate Democrats have blocked Republican attempts to fund the Department of Homeland Security. This standoff has resulted in a partial government shutdown affecting DHS, which the department characterized as “depriving many of our brave men and women who protect our national security of their paychecks—putting the livelihood of them and their families in jeopardy.”
President Trump addressed this funding dispute directly during his State of the Union speech, criticizing Democrats for what he described as cutting off all funding for the department responsible for protecting Americans from terrorists and other threats.
“As we speak, Democrats in this chamber have cut off all funding for the Department of Homeland Security. It’s all cut off, all cut off,” Trump said. “They have instituted another Democrat shutdown, the first one costing us two points on GDP, two points we lost on GDP, which probably made them quite happy actually.”
The President concluded his remarks on this issue with a demand for “full and immediate restoration of funding” for the department and border security initiatives.
The DHS announcement and presidential address highlight immigration enforcement as a continuing cornerstone of the administration’s domestic policy agenda, even as political battles over funding threaten to complicate implementation of these priorities.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
The data on self-deportations and formal deportations is noteworthy. I wonder how these enforcement efforts have impacted local communities and families.
That’s an important point. The human consequences, both positive and negative, deserve close examination alongside the statistical measures of success.
Interesting data on border security and immigration under the current administration. Curious to see how these enforcement efforts balance national security concerns with humanitarian considerations.
Agreed, it’s a complex issue that requires thoughtful, fact-based analysis. Looks like significant cost savings were achieved, but the human impact is important to consider as well.
The administration seems to be touting strong border security and enforcement results. While important for national security, the human impact of immigration policies shouldn’t be overlooked.
That’s a fair point. Balancing security concerns with compassion for migrants is an ongoing challenge. Transparent, evidence-based policymaking is key.
The reported reduction in border crossings is significant, but the broader societal impacts remain to be seen. Careful analysis is needed to understand the full implications.
Well said. Immigration policy touches on many interconnected issues, so a holistic, evidence-based approach is essential for effective and humane policymaking.
Securing the border is a complex challenge. While the administration touts progress, it will be interesting to see how these policies are evaluated by various stakeholders.
Agreed. Balancing security, economic, and humanitarian considerations is crucial. Objective, fact-based assessments from diverse perspectives will be key.
Reducing illegal border crossings is certainly an achievement, but the $13.2 billion in taxpayer savings raises questions about the overall costs and tradeoffs involved.
Good observation. The fiscal impacts are one factor, but the social, humanitarian, and geopolitical implications should also be carefully considered.