Listen to the article
The Justice Department has reportedly dismissed a complaint related to the Hope Florida controversy, a decision Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is celebrating as vindication against what he termed a politically motivated “witch hunt.”
According to The Floridian, the DOJ under President Donald Trump’s administration examined the controversy in late 2025 but determined there was “no predicate to open up an intake on this” and that “no further action is anticipated.” The Justice Department has not publicly confirmed this decision, and requests for comment remain unanswered.
“The witch hunt against the Hope Florida Foundation was orchestrated by left-wing media and their RINO allies,” DeSantis said in a statement to Fox News Digital. “As we’ve said from day one, all agency actions were appropriate and legally sound.”
The governor added, “The Hope Florida initiative continues to be the most successful conservative anti-poverty initiative of any state in the country.”
The controversy stemmed from a $67 million settlement between Florida’s Agency for Health Care Administration and Centene, a major health insurance company specializing in government-sponsored healthcare programs like Medicaid and Medicare. The settlement resolved allegations that Centene had overbilled Medicaid.
After the settlement was finalized in September 2024, $10 million was directed to the Hope Florida Foundation. The foundation subsequently distributed this money as two $5 million grants to 501(c)(4) organizations: Save Our Society from Drugs and Secure Florida’s Future, Inc.
The controversy intensified when it was revealed that $8.5 million of these funds eventually reached Keep Florida Clean, a political action committee that campaigned against Florida Amendment 3. This ballot initiative sought to legalize recreational marijuana through a constitutional change—a measure First Lady Casey DeSantis had openly opposed.
Critics argued that settlement funds originating from a government action should never have been channeled into political campaigning activities. The discovery of this financial flow was initially made by Florida Republican State Representative Alex Andrade, who suggested that James Uthmeier, DeSantis’s then-chief of staff who later became attorney general, was allegedly responsible for orchestrating the movement of these funds.
Andrade had previously stated he didn’t “see how Casey or [Ron] DeSantis are involved” in the controversy.
The reported dismissal of the complaint by Trump’s DOJ represents another instance of improving relations between the president and Governor DeSantis, who were once fierce rivals during the Republican presidential primary. DeSantis suspended his campaign shortly before the New Hampshire primary, acknowledging he saw no viable path to victory.
The decision comes amid ongoing speculation about whether Casey DeSantis will enter the 2026 Florida gubernatorial race. U.S. Representative Byron Donalds has already declared his candidacy and secured President Trump’s endorsement. The filing deadline for Florida’s gubernatorial race is June 12, giving the First Lady limited time to make her decision.
The Hope Florida controversy highlighted tensions between government settlement funds and political activities, raising questions about appropriate boundaries for redirecting public money. For Governor DeSantis, the DOJ’s reported decision marks a significant political victory as he continues to position himself as a leading conservative figure on the national stage.
The situation also reflects the complex political dynamics within the Republican Party following the 2024 presidential race, with former competitors now finding common ground despite their previous rivalries. As Florida’s political landscape continues to evolve heading into the 2026 gubernatorial election, the resolution of this controversy removes one potential obstacle for the DeSantis family’s political future.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
14 Comments
Glad to see this investigation has been dropped, but the lack of public confirmation from the DOJ is concerning. Transparency is important, especially for issues with political implications. I hope we get more clarity on their decision-making process.
You make a fair point. Lack of transparency can fuel speculation and distrust, even if the outcome is positive. The DOJ should aim to provide a clear rationale for their decision.
The Hope Florida Foundation appears to be an interesting anti-poverty program, though the political backdrop makes it hard to assess. I’d be curious to see data on its actual impact and effectiveness, beyond just the political rhetoric.
Agreed, it’s important to look past the partisan framing and focus on the real-world outcomes of initiatives like this. Objective data and analysis will be key.
This seems like a complex issue with political tensions on both sides. I’d want to see the full facts and data before forming an opinion on whether the DOJ investigation was warranted or not. Curious to learn more about the Hope Florida Foundation’s actual impact.
Agreed, the political framing often obscures the real-world realities. An objective, data-driven assessment of the program’s effectiveness would be valuable, beyond just the partisan rhetoric.
This seems like a politically charged issue. I’d want to see the full facts before forming an opinion on whether the investigation was warranted or not. Glad to hear it’s been resolved, but curious to learn more about the details.
Good point. Political tensions often cloud these types of investigations. Hopefully the facts can be objectively examined, regardless of partisan affiliations.
Interesting that the DOJ has reportedly closed this investigation. I’m curious to learn more about the specifics of the Hope Florida Foundation and its work. Glad to see potential political interference being addressed, but want to understand the full context.
Good point. The political backdrop makes it important to get a clear, impartial understanding of the program and the DOJ’s decision-making. Transparency from all sides would be helpful here.
The Hope Florida Foundation seems like an ambitious anti-poverty initiative, though the partisan controversy around it is worrying. I’d be interested to see independent, nonpartisan analysis of its actual impact and effectiveness over time.
Agreed, objective data and evaluation will be crucial in assessing the merits of this program, beyond the political rhetoric. Transparency and rigorous analysis should be the priority.
Interesting that the DOJ has reportedly dropped this investigation into the Hope Florida Foundation. It’ll be good to see the full details once they’re made public. Curious to hear more about the ‘conservative anti-poverty initiative’ mentioned.
I agree, more transparency on the DOJ’s decision-making process here would be helpful. Sounds like an initiative worth looking into further.