Listen to the article
Democrats Warn Citizenship Question in Census Test Could Compromise 2030 Count
Congressional Democrats have raised alarm over the U.S. Census Bureau’s plans to include a citizenship question in upcoming practice tests for the 2030 census, warning the move could significantly undermine participation and accuracy of the once-a-decade population count.
In a strongly worded letter to acting Census Bureau Director George Cook and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform urged officials to abandon plans to use the American Community Survey form, which contains the citizenship question. They instead recommended using the traditional census questionnaire that omits this potentially contentious inquiry.
“The Trump Administration is risking millions of taxpayer dollars to pursue policies which could fatally compromise the 2030 count before it even begins,” the lawmakers wrote, expressing concerns about the upcoming field tests scheduled to begin next month in Huntsville, Alabama, and Spartanburg, South Carolina.
The stakes of an accurate census are enormous. Census data determines how many congressional seats and Electoral College votes each state receives, while also guiding the distribution of approximately $2.8 trillion in federal funding annually. The field tests are designed to help the Bureau improve counting methods, particularly for populations that were undercounted in previous censuses.
Recently, the Census Bureau announced it would use the American Community Survey form for its 2026 test while eliminating four previously planned testing locations in Colorado Springs, western North Carolina, western Texas, and tribal lands in Arizona. This decision has intensified concerns among Democratic lawmakers.
At the heart of their objection is the fear that including a citizenship question would discourage participation among immigrant communities, including legal residents. “Many immigrants or citizens in mixed-status families, including green card holders and other legal permanent residents, face fear, chaos, and uncertainty over who the Trump Administration will target next for denaturalization and deportation,” the Democrats stated in their letter.
This controversy echoes a similar dispute from former President Donald Trump’s first term, when his administration unsuccessfully attempted to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census form. That effort was ultimately blocked by the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump had also signed executive orders to exclude undocumented immigrants from apportionment counts and mandate citizenship data collection, but these were rescinded when President Biden took office in January 2021.
Constitutional considerations loom large in this debate. The 14th Amendment specifies that “the whole number of persons in each state” should be counted for congressional apportionment and Electoral College allocation. Historically, the Census Bureau has interpreted this to mean all residents regardless of immigration status.
The issue has also reached the courts. In a federal lawsuit in Louisiana, the Department of Commerce indicated Thursday that forthcoming criteria regarding who should be counted in the 2030 census could lead to the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by four Republican state attorneys general. That legal challenge seeks to exclude undocumented immigrants from congressional redistricting counts.
Federal government attorneys have requested that proceedings in the case remain paused while the Bureau determines “the matter at the heart of this case — whether and how to count citizens of foreign countries in the United States for the 2030 Census.”
The Census Bureau and Commerce Department have not yet responded to requests for comment on the Democrats’ concerns. Among the new methods being tested in the upcoming field trials is the use of U.S. Postal Service workers to perform tasks previously assigned to census workers, potentially changing how future counts will be conducted.
As preparations for the 2030 census continue, this dispute highlights the persistent tension between ensuring complete population counts and political concerns about immigration and representation.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
7 Comments
Interesting development. The citizenship question has been a major point of contention, with concerns that it could deter participation, especially among immigrant communities. It’s crucial the census process is transparent and inclusive to ensure an accurate population count.
The accuracy of the census is paramount. While the citizenship question may have merit, the risk of skewing the results is worrying. I hope the Bureau can find a solution that maintains public trust and ensures a fair, representative count.
This is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. On one hand, the citizenship question could provide valuable data. But the potential to deter participation is also a serious concern. It will be interesting to see how the Census Bureau navigates this challenge.
A politically charged question like this has the potential to undermine the whole census process. The Bureau needs to tread carefully to preserve the integrity of this critical national exercise. Transparency and inclusive outreach will be key.
This highlights the challenging balancing act the Census Bureau faces. On one hand, the citizenship data could be useful. But the risk of depressed participation, especially in immigrant communities, is very concerning. A careful, evidence-based approach is warranted.
The census data has significant implications for political representation and resource allocation. Any measures that could compromise its integrity should be carefully considered. I hope the Census Bureau can find a balanced approach that addresses all stakeholder concerns.
An accurate census is crucial for fair political representation and resource allocation. The citizenship question is a lightning rod issue, and the Bureau will have to navigate it skillfully to maintain public confidence in the process.