Listen to the article
In a curious political snub that caught the attention of Republican critics, the Democratic National Committee’s official Presidents’ Day message conspicuously omitted former President Bill Clinton from its celebratory image, triggering mockery and speculation about the reasoning behind the exclusion.
The DNC’s social media post featured a collection of Democratic presidents including John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, Franklin Roosevelt, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden. However, Clinton, who served two terms from 1993 to 2001 and remains one of the party’s most popular modern presidents, was nowhere to be seen in the tribute. Harry Truman was also absent from the lineup.
The Republican National Committee quickly seized on the omission, retweeting the Democrats’ post with an image of Clinton wearing glasses and sitting next to his wife, Hillary Clinton. “Forget someone again??” the RNC caption read, highlighting what they perceived as an intentional slight against the 42nd president.
Fox News Digital reached out to the DNC for clarification on whether the omission was deliberate but did not receive an immediate response. The Clinton Foundation was also contacted for comment on the matter.
Meanwhile, Republicans shared their own Presidents’ Day tribute featuring Mount Rushmore with a color image of former President Donald Trump positioned next to Abraham Lincoln on the iconic South Dakota monument. The Department of Health and Human Services also posted a Presidents’ Day message with a composite image that included Trump, Lincoln, and George Washington.
Clinton’s popularity during his presidency was undeniable, with strong economic growth and budget surpluses marking his tenure. He left office in 2001 with approval ratings exceeding 60 percent, among the highest for any modern president at the end of their term.
However, Clinton’s administration was also marred by significant scandals that continue to cast a shadow over his legacy. Kenneth Starr’s investigation into the Whitewater controversy, involving a failed Arkansas land deal from Clinton’s time as state attorney general, eventually led to more damaging revelations. While Clinton himself was never charged with wrongdoing in the Whitewater matter, several associates, including business partners Jim and Susan McDougal and Clinton’s successor as Arkansas governor, Jim Guy Tucker, were convicted of related crimes.
The Whitewater investigation took an unexpected turn when Starr uncovered evidence of Clinton’s relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. This scandal culminated in Clinton’s impeachment by the House of Representatives in December 1998, though he was ultimately acquitted by the Senate and remained in office.
In one of the most memorable moments of his presidency, Clinton emphatically denied the allegations during a January 26, 1998 press conference, stating, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman… These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people.”
In recent years, Clinton’s reputation has faced renewed scrutiny amid changing cultural attitudes about workplace power dynamics and sexual misconduct. His connections to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have also drawn negative attention, with both Bill and Hillary Clinton recently agreeing to testify in a congressional probe related to Epstein after facing the threat of contempt charges.
The DNC’s decision to exclude Clinton from its Presidents’ Day celebration may reflect the party’s complicated relationship with his legacy in the current political climate. While many Democrats still credit Clinton with significant policy achievements and political skills, others have distanced themselves from aspects of his personal conduct and certain policy positions that no longer align with the party’s current platform.
Whether intentional or accidental, the omission highlights the evolving nature of political legacies and how parties choose to position themselves in relation to their own historical figures as values and priorities change over time.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
14 Comments
The DNC’s Presidents’ Day post has certainly generated a lot of discussion and controversy. The exclusion of Clinton is noteworthy, and I’m curious to hear the party’s explanation, if any. Regardless of one’s political leanings, he was a significant figure in Democratic history.
The RNC’s reaction is predictable, but they do raise a fair point. Clinton’s absence from the DNC’s tribute is certainly conspicuous.
Interesting to see the DNC’s Presidents’ Day post generate this much attention and controversy. Clinton’s exclusion is certainly noteworthy, but I’m curious to hear the party’s reasoning behind it.
The RNC’s reaction is predictable, but they do make a fair point. Clinton is a significant Democratic figure, so his absence is peculiar.
Interesting move by the DNC to exclude Clinton from their Presidents’ Day post. Wonder if there’s some underlying political reasoning behind that decision, or if it was simply an oversight. Curious to see how this plays out.
I can understand the RNC’s perspective on this – it does seem like a deliberate snub of a prominent Democratic president.
The DNC’s omission of Clinton is certainly noteworthy. While he remains a polarizing figure, he was still a consequential president who modernized the party. Curious to hear the DNC’s explanation, if any.
I agree, the absence of Clinton is puzzling. Regardless of one’s political leanings, he was an impactful leader who helped shape the Democratic party.
This seems like an odd oversight by the DNC, especially given Clinton’s legacy and continued influence within the party. Curious to see if they address the criticism or if it was truly unintentional.
The RNC’s reaction is predictable, but they do have a point. Clinton is a major Democratic figure, so his exclusion stands out.
The DNC’s decision to leave Clinton out of their Presidents’ Day post is certainly curious. While he was a polarizing figure, he was still an impactful Democratic leader. I wonder if this was a deliberate choice or simply an oversight.
I agree, the omission of Clinton is puzzling. Regardless of one’s political views, he was an important president who left a lasting mark on the party.
While Clinton is a complex historical figure, he was undoubtedly an important president for the Democrats. The DNC’s decision to leave him out of their tribute is puzzling and raises questions about their motivations.
I can understand the DNC’s hesitation to fully embrace Clinton given some of the controversies during his presidency. However, omitting him entirely feels like a politically risky move.