Listen to the article
In a race that could determine control of the House of Representatives, Democratic Rep. Josh Riley faces accusations of hypocrisy over his financial ties to a utility company he has publicly criticized for raising rates in his competitive New York district.
Riley, who represents New York’s 19th congressional district, has made fighting high utility costs a cornerstone of his reelection campaign. He has specifically targeted New York State Electric & Gas (NYSEG), accusing the company of “robbery” and claiming it seeks to “line the pockets” of its Spanish parent company, Iberdrola.
However, reporting from Mid-Hudson News revealed that Riley owns up to $250,000 in mutual funds that hold shares of Iberdrola. The outlet also found that Riley’s campaign received $1,500 in donations from a lobbyist who directly represented Avangrid, Iberdrola’s primary U.S. subsidiary, when the contributions were made.
Republican state Sen. Peter Oberacker, Riley’s likely opponent in November’s general election, didn’t mince words when addressing these connections. “I think we could sum it up in one word: hypocrite,” Oberacker told Fox News Digital. “I don’t know any other word that fully encompasses what’s going on.”
Riley’s campaign defended the congressman, stating he “doesn’t own stocks, doesn’t take corporate PAC money, and is the only person in this race who’s actually taking on the utility monopolies to lower our bills.” The campaign also accused Oberacker of attempting to distract from his own ties to NYSEG, noting he had received donations from Avangrid’s New York PAC.
A spokesman for Oberacker’s campaign countered that those donations, totaling $350, were returned before he entered the congressional race. Oberacker also received former President Donald Trump’s “complete and total endorsement” in February for the upcoming contest.
The controversy unfolds against a backdrop of soaring energy costs in New York State. According to the Energy Information Administration, New York’s residential electricity rates were more than 50% higher than the national average in December 2025, placing significant financial pressure on households throughout the region.
“The folks in upstate New York are being squeezed at every turn,” Oberacker said. “I’m running to bring a reality check to the congressional district.”
Oberacker has positioned himself as a champion for ratepayers, unveiling a “ratepayer bill of rights” in late 2025 that would require itemized billing and in-person hearings in communities subject to rate hikes. The proposal aims to provide greater transparency to consumers about their utility bills.
Republicans have attempted to link Riley to New York’s 2019 climate law, which many believe is contributing to higher electric bills. Several environmental organizations that have endorsed Riley also advocated for the climate legislation.
The potential financial impact of the state’s climate policies became more apparent in February when the New York State Energy and Research Development Authority projected households would pay $4,000 in additional annual energy costs if the state enacts a carbon tax as outlined in the law. Even Governor Kathy Hochul, who previously supported such measures, recently warned of “cataclysmic” costs for businesses.
This race in New York’s 19th district could prove pivotal in determining which party controls the House of Representatives after November’s elections. Currently rated as “Lean Democrat” by the nonpartisan Cook Political Report, the district is one of several battleground races that will be closely watched.
“There is no doubt that the House majority runs through the congressional New York 19th district,” Oberacker said, highlighting the national significance of this local race.
Riley, a first-term Democrat, narrowly won this purple swing district in 2024 in an area that President Trump lost by just two percentage points, underscoring the competitive nature of the upcoming contest and its importance to both parties’ congressional strategies.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
It’s always important for politicians to be transparent about their financial interests, especially when they relate to issues they’ve taken public stances on. Allegations of hypocrisy erode public trust, so Riley should address this directly and provide a clear explanation.
It’s always concerning when an elected official’s personal financial interests seem to clash with their public positions. Voters deserve representatives who are uncompromisingly committed to serving the public good, not their own private interests.
This is a tricky situation that could have broader implications for the Democratic party’s energy and environmental policy platform. They’ll need to address this carefully to avoid appearing hypocritical on these key issues.
As someone who follows energy and commodities news, I’m curious to see how this story develops. Allegations of hypocrisy are always concerning, regardless of political affiliation. Voters should demand accountability from all their representatives.
This situation highlights the need for stricter rules around financial transparency and recusal for elected officials. Even the appearance of a conflict of interest can undermine public trust, so Riley needs to address this head-on.
Energy costs are a major concern for many families, so it’s understandable that Riley would want to take on a utility company over rate hikes. However, these revelations about his personal investments are quite troubling and warrant further scrutiny.
This seems like a concerning case of potential hypocrisy. If Rep. Riley has financial ties to the very utility company he has publicly criticized, that raises serious questions about his motives and integrity. Voters deserve elected officials who practice what they preach.
Curious to see how Riley responds to these allegations. Will he provide a satisfactory explanation, or will this become a major liability in his reelection campaign? Voters should demand transparency on these issues.
It’s disappointing to see allegations of this nature against a Democratic representative, especially one who has positioned himself as a champion for affordable energy. This could undermine his credibility if not properly addressed.
This story is a good reminder of the importance of campaign finance reform and stronger conflict of interest rules for lawmakers. The public deserves to know that their representatives are acting in their best interests, not their own.
This story highlights the need for stronger financial disclosure requirements and ethics rules for elected officials. The public deserves to know where their representatives’ money is coming from and whether it could influence their decision-making.