Listen to the article
Hundreds of counterprotesters overwhelmed a far-right demonstration in Minneapolis on Saturday, forcing the small group of pro-immigration enforcement activists to retreat as tensions escalated amid ongoing protests over federal immigration operations.
Conservative influencer Jake Lang had organized an anti-Islam rally in support of recent Department of Homeland Security immigration enforcement actions. Lang, who had previously announced intentions to burn a Quran at City Hall, attracted only a handful of supporters while facing a crowd of hundreds who shouted down his attempts to speak.
“We’re out here to show Nazis and ICE and DHS and MAGA you are not welcome in Minneapolis,” said protester Luke Rimington. “Stay out of our city, stay out of our state. Go home.”
The confrontation became physical, with counterprotesters reportedly throwing snowballs and water balloons. Lang appeared to sustain head injuries, showing bruises and scrapes as he left the scene. Some counterprotesters forced at least one person to remove clothing deemed offensive before armored police vehicles arrived.
In response to the escalating situation, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz mobilized the National Guard to support the Minnesota State Patrol. Major Andrea Tsuchiya, a Guard spokesperson, described the troops as “staged and ready” though not yet deployed to city streets. The Guard’s mission, according to its statement, includes providing traffic support and protecting “the rights of all Minnesotans to assemble peacefully.”
This mobilization comes as Minneapolis has experienced daily protests since the Department of Homeland Security intensified immigration enforcement operations in the Twin Cities region, bringing in more than 2,000 federal officers. The aggressive tactics have drawn sharp criticism from local residents and officials.
Lang himself has a controversial background. He previously faced charges including assaulting an officer with a baseball bat during the January 6 Capitol riot before receiving clemency from President Donald Trump last year. He recently announced his candidacy for U.S. Senate in Florida.
The Minneapolis demonstrations represent just one flashpoint in the increasingly contentious debate over immigration enforcement. Protesters have condemned what they describe as aggressive tactics by masked immigration officers who have reportedly pulled people from homes and vehicles. The operation has already claimed one life—U.S. citizen Renee Good, mother of three, who was shot by an ICE officer during a January 7 confrontation.
The human impact of these operations was highlighted during a Saturday news conference featuring Garrison Gibson, a Liberian civil war refugee who was arrested in a raid that went viral after officers broke down his door with a battering ram on January 11. Gibson, who has legally remained in the country under a supervision order despite a 2008 drug conviction that was later dismissed, described living in fear.
“I don’t leave the house,” Gibson said at the news conference.
After his initial arrest, a judge ruled that federal officials failed to provide adequate notice that his supervision status had been revoked. Though briefly detained again during a routine check-in with immigration officials, Gibson was returned home following the judge’s intervention.
His family reported spending $700 to repair their damaged front door, which they had temporarily secured with a dumbbell during subfreezing temperatures.
In a further legal development affecting the ongoing operations, a federal judge ruled Friday that immigration officers cannot detain or tear gas peaceful protesters who are observing but not obstructing authorities during the Minnesota enforcement actions.
The Department of Homeland Security criticized the judicial intervention, with Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin stating, “We will continue to fight for the arrest, detention, and removal of aliens who have no right to be in this country.”
Gibson, meanwhile, defended his compliance with the system over nearly two decades: “If I was a violent person, I would not have been out these past 17 years, checking in.”
As federal immigration operations continue, Minneapolis remains a focal point in the national immigration debate, with communities divided over enforcement priorities and methods in one of the country’s most diverse metropolitan regions.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
While I don’t condone violence from any side, the counterprotesters appear to have been defending their community against inflammatory rhetoric and actions. Immigration is a complex, sensitive issue and thoughtful solutions require nuance, not grandstanding. Hopefully this incident leads to more constructive dialogue.
I agree, nuance and empathy are needed when addressing divisive topics like immigration. Resorting to confrontation and physical altercations is unlikely to lead to positive outcomes. Policymakers and community leaders should focus on bringing people together through open, honest discussions.
Interesting situation in Minneapolis. While I understand the concerns over immigration enforcement, I’m not sure escalating tensions and confronting protesters is the best approach. Both sides should try to engage in respectful dialogue and find common ground.
I agree, violence and confrontation rarely lead to productive solutions. Hopefully the authorities can deescalate the situation and facilitate open, civil discussions between the different groups.
As an energy and mining industry observer, I’m curious how this political unrest in Minnesota could impact operations and projects in the region, particularly around critical minerals like copper, nickel, and rare earths. Maintaining social license and regulatory stability is so important for these capital-intensive investments.
That’s a good point. Prolonged social and political turmoil can certainly create challenges for mining and energy projects, even if they’re not directly involved. Consistent, predictable policies and community engagement are key to managing those risks.
This incident highlights the divisiveness and polarization around immigration issues in the US. It’s concerning to see physical altercations breaking out, even if the counterprotesters felt they were acting in defense of their community. Thoughtful compromise will be needed to address these complex challenges.
Absolutely. Inflammatory rhetoric and confrontational tactics from all sides tend to entrench divisions rather than bring people together. I hope cooler heads can prevail and the focus shifts to constructive policy solutions.
As someone interested in the mining and energy sectors, I’m concerned about how this type of political unrest could impact investment and operations in the region. Stable, predictable regulatory environments are critical for capital-intensive projects. I hope the authorities can deescalate the situation and facilitate more productive dialogue.