Listen to the article
In a potential 2028 presidential matchup that could reshape America’s electoral landscape, Vice President JD Vance is emerging as the Republican frontrunner to succeed Donald Trump, while Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro has surprisingly overtaken California’s Gavin Newsom as the predicted Democratic nominee among AmericaFest attendees.
The possibility of a Vance-Shapiro contest would pit two relatively young political figures against each other—Vance at 41 and Shapiro at 52—potentially bringing fresh energy to the political arena after the Trump presidency concludes.
Shapiro, who has publicly dismissed White House ambitions, recently told HBO’s Bill Maher that he’s “not an expert” on Washington politics and prefers to “live in the real world in Pennsylvania where we have to balance budgets.” Despite his apparent reluctance, AmericaFest attendees viewed him as more politically viable than the more outspoken Newsom.
Barbara from Camarillo, California expressed hope that Vance would follow in Trump’s footsteps, describing him as a “great candidate” who comes from “the team that Trump built.” She predicted Shapiro would be the Democratic nominee, asserting he would have “the most effect because I don’t think anybody else has any credibility.” She went further to suggest that in a theoretical Shapiro-Newsom matchup, the Pennsylvania governor “would wipe the floor with” the Californian.
The prospect of a Rust Belt battle carries significant electoral implications. Shapiro’s strong name recognition in Pennsylvania could potentially help Democrats reclaim a state that Trump successfully flipped in his political career, reshaping the concept of the “blue wall” that has been central to Democratic strategy in presidential elections.
Nick from Nashville echoed the sentiment about Shapiro’s viability, suggesting that while Newsom or Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez might appeal to the Democratic base, the Democratic National Committee would be strategically wise to support Shapiro’s nomination.
On the Republican side, attendees consistently mentioned Vance as Trump’s natural successor. Nick predicted that “the conservative party will kind of conglomerate over somebody like Trump,” noting that Trump “basically built the conservative movement” and would likely have significant influence over the 2028 nominee.
Karen from Wisconsin named both Vance and Florida Senator Marco Rubio as her preferred Republican candidates. “We have so many good conservatives that could come in and take over. And I hope that we get another eight, 16 more years of Republicans that have put our country in the right direction,” she said.
The speculation reflects broader shifts in both parties’ demographics and appeal. Shapiro has occasionally broken with progressive orthodoxy, particularly on the issue of antisemitism, potentially positioning him as a more moderate Democratic option. Meanwhile, Vance, who rose to national prominence through his memoir “Hillbilly Elegy” before entering politics, represents the Trump-aligned wing of the Republican Party.
Amy from Michigan also predicted a Vance-Shapiro contest, while Elizabeth from San Diego expressed concern that despite her preference, her state’s governor, Newsom, seemed more likely to secure the Democratic nomination than either Shapiro or Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, another name occasionally mentioned in 2028 discussions.
Ed from San Diego offered a slightly different Republican prediction, suggesting either Vance or Secretary of State Marco Rubio would be the Republican standard-bearer after Trump.
The early speculation comes as both parties begin the subtle positioning that typically precedes presidential campaigns, with potential candidates carefully balancing current responsibilities with future ambitions. While 2028 remains distant, the conversations at AmericaFest suggest the contours of post-Trump politics are already taking shape, with the Rust Belt potentially returning to its traditional role as the decisive battleground in American presidential politics.
When reached for comment, a representative for Shapiro’s 2026 gubernatorial re-election campaign did not offer a response.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
The potential Vance-Shapiro matchup is an intriguing development. Both candidates bring unique strengths and perspectives to the table. It will be fascinating to see how their campaigns unfold and how voters respond to their visions for the country.
Shapiro’s reluctance to embrace national ambitions is an interesting strategic choice. It could resonate with voters seeking a more pragmatic, results-oriented leader. But he’ll need to find a way to build national momentum without appearing too aloof from the national stage.
That’s a good point. Shapiro will need to strike the right balance between maintaining his local focus and demonstrating his ability to lead on the national stage. Navigating that will be crucial to his success.
This is a race worth watching closely. The divergent paths of Vance and Shapiro could have significant implications for the future direction of both parties. I’m curious to see how their policy platforms evolve and how they position themselves to appeal to a broad range of voters.
Shapiro’s apparent reluctance to embrace national ambitions is intriguing. His focus on governing Pennsylvania may resonate with voters seeking a pragmatic, results-oriented leader. It will be interesting to see if he can maintain that position as the 2028 race heats up.
Barbara’s view of Vance as the ‘team that Trump built’ candidate is worth noting. The Republican base will likely be a key battleground, and Vance’s ability to capture that support could be crucial. But Shapiro’s more moderate profile may also have broad appeal.
You’re right, the Republican base will be crucial. Vance will need to balance appealing to the Trump loyalists while also expanding his reach to independent and moderate voters.
Interesting to see the divide emerging among conservatives for 2028. Vance seems to be positioning himself as the Trump successor, while Shapiro could offer a fresh Democratic alternative. It will be fascinating to see how this plays out.
This is an early glimpse of what could be a highly consequential 2028 election. The contrast between Vance and Shapiro’s backgrounds and policy approaches will surely be a focal point. It will be important to see how they navigate the changing political landscape.
The Vance-Shapiro matchup would certainly be a generational shift from the Trump era. Both are relatively young and could bring new energy to the political landscape. I’m curious to see how their policy platforms and campaign strategies compare.