Listen to the article
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has filed a federal lawsuit against Texas Governor Greg Abbott, challenging his recent proclamation designating the organization as a “foreign terrorist organization.” The legal action, initiated Thursday by CAIR’s Dallas-Fort Worth and Austin chapters, seeks to overturn what the organization describes as an unconstitutional executive decree.
In the lawsuit, CAIR argues that Abbott’s proclamation violates both the U.S. Constitution and Texas state law. “This attempt to punish the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization simply because Governor Abbott disagrees with its views is not only contrary to the United States Constitution, but finds no support in any Texas law,” the organization stated in its court filing.
CAIR, established in 1994, operates 25 chapters across the United States. The Texas chapter maintains a modest staff of eight employees and two contractors, according to the legal documents.
The governor’s proclamation, issued earlier this week, extends the “terrorist” designation to the Muslim Brotherhood as well, despite neither group being classified as terrorist organizations by federal authorities. Abbott’s decree also prohibits CAIR from purchasing land in Texas under a recently enacted statute designed to prevent land acquisitions by entities connected to “foreign adversaries.”
In their filing, CAIR contends that Abbott based his declaration on “inflammatory statements with no basis in fact” and selectively cited remarks from affiliates to portray the organization as sympathetic to terrorism.
“No civil rights organizations are safe if a governor can baselessly and unilaterally declare any of them terrorist groups, ban them from buying land, and threaten them with closure,” said Lena Masri, CAIR’s Litigation Director and General Counsel, in a statement. “We have beaten Greg Abbott’s attacks on the First Amendment before, and God willing, we will do it again now.”
The Muslim Legal Fund of America has expressed support for the legal challenge. The organization’s attorney, Charlie Swift, stated, “Mr. Abbott’s unconstitutional proclamation undermines the very foundational notions of due process that our system depends upon and it must not stand. For the sake of our nation’s basic freedoms, Greg Abbott’s latest attack on the American people must be defeated.”
This conflict emerges against a backdrop of escalating tensions regarding Muslim communities in Texas. Earlier this year, Abbott and other Republican state officials launched investigations into a Muslim-centered planned community near Dallas associated with the East Plano Islamic Center (EPIC). State officials claimed the development was attempting to create an exclusive community operating under Islamic law, allegations that EPIC representatives dismissed as dangerous and baseless.
The U.S. Justice Department subsequently conducted a civil rights investigation into the planned community but closed the case without filing charges or lawsuits.
The confrontation between Texas authorities and CAIR highlights growing political and cultural tensions surrounding Muslim communities in the state. CAIR-Texas issued a defiant statement in response to Abbott’s actions: “CAIR-Texas and the Texas Muslim community are standing up for our constitutional rights by directly confronting Greg Abbott’s lawless attack on our civil rights. We are not and will not be intimidated by smear campaigns launched by Israel First politicians like Mr. Abbott.”
The organization further stated that Abbott’s actions were motivated by CAIR’s effectiveness as an advocate for justice both domestically and internationally, pledging to “continue exercising our constitutional rights, defending civil rights, and speaking truth to power, whether in defense of free speech, religious freedom and racial equality here in Texas or in defense of human rights abroad.”
The case now awaits judicial review as both sides prepare for what could be a precedent-setting legal battle over executive authority, religious freedom, and civil liberties in Texas.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


7 Comments
While I understand concerns about extremism, labeling a major Muslim civil rights group as ‘terrorist’ without evidence seems like political posturing, not sound policy. CAIR deserves its day in court on this.
I’m curious to see how this plays out legally. The Texas governor’s actions seem problematic, but CAIR will need to make a strong case that the designation violates their rights under the Constitution.
Yes, this will be an interesting test case on the limits of executive power versus civil liberties. I’ll be following the developments closely.
Designating CAIR as a ‘terrorist’ organization is a very serious allegation that requires solid proof, not just political disagreement. This lawsuit will shed light on the governor’s justification for such a provocative move.
This lawsuit against Texas over the ‘terrorist’ designation of CAIR raises important constitutional questions. Designating an advocacy group as a terrorist organization without evidence seems like overreach, even if one disagrees with their views.
Agreed, the governor’s move appears to be more politically motivated than based on facts. CAIR should have the right to challenge this in court.
I’m glad to see CAIR taking legal action to challenge the Texas governor’s ‘terrorist’ designation. Targeting advocacy groups for their views, without clear evidence of wrongdoing, sets a dangerous precedent.