Listen to the article
In a forceful address to South Carolina Democrats, former President Joe Biden accused President Donald Trump of attempting to “erase the truth” and diminishing America’s global leadership position.
“It’s not just my record Trump’s trying to erase,” Biden told the gathering, referring to the president’s efforts to dismantle the Affordable Care Act. “He’s trying to erase fairness, equity, history, the truth,” Biden continued, citing instances where information about slavery has reportedly been removed or altered at museums and national parks during Trump’s administration.
Biden emphasized the importance of historical honesty, stating, “Great nations don’t bury the truth. They face it. This is a great nation.”
The former president was speaking at a “thank you” event organized by South Carolina Democrats who helped revitalize his presidential campaign six years ago. His remarks highlighted growing concerns about Trump’s approach to American history and his administration’s policies regarding the Smithsonian Institution.
Last summer, Trump criticized the Smithsonian as being “OUT OF CONTROL,” claiming its exhibits focused too heavily on negative aspects of American history, particularly slavery. Trump subsequently ordered a review of the institution to ensure its exhibits aligned with celebrating “American exceptionalism.”
Biden characterized the current political climate as “dark days,” warning that “our future is literally on the line.” He issued a stark caution about the upcoming midterm elections, alleging that Trump is “trying to steal the election because he knows he can’t win your vote, so he’s going to do everything he can to prevent you from wanting to vote.”
The former president also criticized Trump’s policies on healthcare, immigration enforcement, and international relations. He referenced a controversial Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation in Minnesota that resulted in two deaths, saying Americans “don’t like what they saw in Minnesota: Mass ICE agents pulling people out of their homes and literally murdering two people in the street.”
Biden, 83, expressed optimism about Democratic prospects in November, boldly predicting that his party would reclaim control of both the Senate and House of Representatives. “We have reason to be hopeful,” he said, “because time and again throughout history, in the moments of great crisis, Americans have summoned the better angels of our nature and brought our country back from the abyss.”
On foreign policy, Biden touted his diplomatic experience, claiming he knows more heads of state than any previous president. He cited a Pew Research Poll showing what he described as a “dramatic drop in our reputation around the world” under Trump’s leadership, warning that if the United States doesn’t lead globally, Russia or China could fill the void.
Biden also criticized Trump’s recent State of the Union address for its omissions, noting that despite speaking for nearly two hours, Trump “never mentioned the anniversary of Putin invading Ukraine.” He further admonished the president for failing to acknowledge Americans killed by ICE agents in Minneapolis earlier this year or victims of Jeffrey Epstein who were present in the audience.
The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Biden’s remarks.
The speech underscores the intensifying political rhetoric as both parties position themselves ahead of crucial midterm elections, with Democrats seeking to regain congressional control while Republicans aim to maintain their current advantages in Washington.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
20 Comments
The debate over the Smithsonian’s exhibits reflects deeper divisions around the role of government in shaping historical narratives. It’s a complex issue without easy answers.
Agreed. These are delicate matters that require nuanced discussions, not knee-jerk partisan reactions. Reasonable people can disagree on the appropriate balance.
The issue of the Smithsonian’s exhibits is a microcosm of a broader debate around the role of government in shaping public discourse and historical understanding. Reasonable people can disagree, but the emphasis should be on fostering open and honest dialogue.
Exactly. Regardless of one’s political leanings, a commitment to factual accuracy and avoiding the politicization of history should be the priority.
This case touches on the complex and often contentious relationship between politics, history, and national identity. While the specific details are debatable, the overall need for historical integrity and honesty is undeniable.
Well said. These are sensitive issues that require a nuanced approach and a genuine commitment to understanding the past, rather than simply using it as a political weapon.
This debate touches on longstanding tensions around the role of government, the nature of patriotism, and the purpose of historical education. It’s an issue that will likely continue to be hotly contested.
You’re right, this is a complex and multifaceted issue without easy solutions. Constructive dialogue and a commitment to facts will be crucial going forward.
This speaks to a broader challenge of balancing patriotism and critical self-reflection. A great nation must be willing to confront its past, both the positives and negatives, in order to grow and improve.
Well said. Glossing over uncomfortable truths does a disservice to the public and undermines the foundations of democracy.
Biden’s emphasis on ‘facing the truth’ is admirable, though his political motivations should also be considered. Objective historical analysis is crucial, regardless of one’s political affiliation.
That’s a fair point. Maintaining impartiality and avoiding the politicization of history is an ongoing challenge for public institutions.
The debate over the Smithsonian’s exhibits reflects the ongoing struggle to balance the preservation of national pride with a willingness to confront difficult historical truths. It’s a delicate balance that requires empathy, critical thinking, and a commitment to facts.
Absolutely. Upholding historical accuracy and promoting open dialogue should be the shared goals, regardless of one’s political affiliation or personal biases.
While the specific details of this case may be politically charged, the underlying principle of preserving historical integrity is an important one. Reasonable people can disagree on the specifics, but the overall goal should be to uphold truth and transparency.
Well said. Maintaining the balance between patriotism and critical self-examination is an ongoing challenge, but one that is essential for a healthy democracy.
Interesting to see the continued debate over the role of historical truth and national identity. While political views may differ, I believe open and honest dialogue is important for a healthy democracy.
I agree that historical accuracy should not be compromised for political agendas. The public deserves access to factual information, even if it challenges certain narratives.
This debate highlights the need for a nuanced and non-partisan approach to historical education and representation. Simplistic narratives, whether positive or negative, often fail to capture the full complexity of the past.
Agreed. A commitment to objective, evidence-based historical analysis should be the goal, rather than allowing political agendas to dictate the narrative.