Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In the aftermath of Alex Pretti’s fatal shooting in Minneapolis, the White House has redirected responsibility to Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) for the initial statements made following the incident that occurred last Saturday.

Homeland Security Adviser Stephen Miller issued a statement to NewsNation explaining that the Department of Homeland Security’s first public comments on the shooting were based on information provided by CBP personnel at the scene. “The initial statement from DHS was based on reports from CBP on the ground,” Miller clarified.

Miller further elaborated on the administration’s intended protocol for the operation, stating that “the White House provided clear guidance to DHS that the extra personnel that had been sent to Minnesota for force protection should be used for conducting fugitive operations to create a physical barrier between the arrest teams and the disruptors.”

The adviser acknowledged potential procedural failures, adding, “We are evaluating why the CBP team may not have been following that protocol.” This statement suggests an internal review is underway to determine where communication or operational breakdowns occurred during the incident.

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem has similarly attributed the department’s early commentary on the shooting to information received from CBP officials. The alignment between Miller’s and Noem’s explanations indicates a coordinated response strategy from the administration as criticism mounts.

The fatal shooting has generated significant backlash against the administration from across the political spectrum. Civil rights groups have demanded transparency about the circumstances of Pretti’s death, while lawmakers from both parties have called for a thorough investigation into the incident.

Law enforcement operations involving federal agencies in urban settings have long been controversial, particularly when they result in civilian casualties. The Minneapolis community, still healing from previous high-profile police incidents, has responded with protests demanding accountability and justice for Pretti.

As pressure continues to build, President Trump appears to be attempting to shift public attention away from the controversy. On Tuesday, amid growing criticism, the President pivoted to economic messaging during an appearance in Iowa, focusing on his administration’s financial agenda ahead of the upcoming midterm elections.

The incident comes at a politically sensitive time, with midterm elections approaching and the administration facing scrutiny over its law enforcement and immigration policies. Federal operations targeting fugitives have been a cornerstone of the administration’s domestic security strategy, but incidents like the Pretti shooting have reignited debates about appropriate tactics and oversight.

Minneapolis city officials have called for greater coordination between federal and local law enforcement, with some suggesting that better communication might have prevented the tragic outcome. Mayor Jacob Frey has requested a comprehensive briefing on the operation that led to Pretti’s death.

The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees CBP, has not yet released complete details about the circumstances surrounding the shooting, citing the ongoing investigation. However, pressure is mounting for the release of body camera footage that might clarify the sequence of events.

Community advocates have emphasized that regardless of operational protocols or communication issues between agencies, the focus should remain on accountability for Pretti’s death and ensuring similar incidents don’t occur in the future.

As investigations continue, the administration’s attempt to redirect responsibility to CBP raises questions about oversight and accountability within federal law enforcement operations, issues likely to remain at the forefront of public discourse as additional details emerge about the Minneapolis incident.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

14 Comments

  1. This highlights the need for clear protocols and coordination between different law enforcement agencies, especially when high-profile incidents occur. Hopefully the internal review can identify areas for improvement.

    • Oliver Rodriguez on

      Absolutely. Robust communication and well-defined procedures are essential for effective and responsible law enforcement operations.

  2. The White House’s acknowledgment of the misinformation and commitment to an internal review is a step in the right direction. Transparency and accountability are essential for maintaining public trust.

    • Robert Martinez on

      Absolutely. Identifying and addressing breakdowns in communication and procedure will be crucial to improving the response to future incidents of this nature.

  3. Isabella Taylor on

    It’s concerning to see issues with the initial statements from DHS. Effective communication and coordination between agencies is critical, especially in sensitive situations like this.

    • Michael Taylor on

      I agree. Ensuring accurate and timely information is shared is key, so that the public can have confidence in the authorities’ handling of such incidents.

  4. Michael I. Smith on

    Interesting to see the White House acknowledging issues with the initial DHS statements on this incident. Transparency and accountability are important, even when mistakes are made.

    • Agreed. Sorting out the details and communication breakdowns will be crucial to understanding what happened and preventing similar issues in the future.

  5. Elijah E. Martin on

    This situation highlights the importance of clear protocols and effective coordination between different law enforcement agencies. The internal review should provide valuable insights to help prevent similar issues in the future.

    • Agreed. Strengthening inter-agency collaboration and information-sharing will be key to ensuring a more coherent and transparent response to high-profile incidents.

  6. It’s good to see the White House taking responsibility for the initial misinformation and committing to an internal review. Maintaining public trust requires accountability and a willingness to learn from mistakes.

    • Amelia Williams on

      Well said. Owning up to issues and being proactive about addressing them is a sign of strong leadership and a commitment to improving processes and procedures.

  7. Elijah Martinez on

    The White House’s willingness to acknowledge missteps and order an internal review is a positive sign. Maintaining public trust requires transparency, even when mistakes are made.

    • Well said. Owning up to issues and taking steps to address them is important for maintaining credibility and legitimacy in the eyes of the public.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.