Listen to the article
Western Media Accused of Spreading Misinformation About Hungary’s Government
Western mainstream media outlets have come under fire for publishing what Hungarian officials call unsubstantiated claims and conspiracy theories targeting Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s government. These recent incidents appear to form a pattern of reporting that Hungarian officials believe is designed to undermine the current administration ahead of the 2026 election.
On December 9, U.S.-based outlet Defense One published what it claimed was a “longer version” of the Trump administration’s National Security Strategy (NSS). This alleged extended document suggested Washington planned to draw certain European countries—specifically Austria, Poland, Italy, and Hungary—away from the European Union to form a closer alliance aimed at “Making Europe Great Again.” The purported strategy described Europe as facing “civilizational erasure” due to immigration policies and speech restrictions.
The alleged document also proposed creating a new global leadership forum called the “Core 5” (C5), consisting of the United States, China, Russia, India, and Japan, which would operate alongside a diminished G7.
The White House quickly rejected these claims. Spokeswoman Anna Kelly unequivocally stated that no alternate, private, or classified version of the NSS exists, dismissing the report as misinformation spread by individuals “distant from the President.”
Hungarian officials contend that this fabricated story serves dual purposes: stoking tensions between the U.S. and EU while simultaneously turning Hungarian citizens against the Orbán government by associating it with an EU exit strategy—a position that would be deeply unpopular domestically. Prime Minister Orbán has consistently affirmed Hungary’s future within the EU, despite his frequent criticisms of Brussels.
Just two days later, on December 11, Bloomberg published an article claiming that Orbán plans to transform Hungary’s parliamentary democracy into a presidential system to “remain in power” after next year’s election. The story relied on unnamed sources and suggested Orbán was inspired by his November meeting with Donald Trump.
State Secretary Zoltán Kovács firmly rejected the Bloomberg report, describing it as “the usual leftist fake-news routine” and noting similar unsubstantiated claims had been made in previous years.
The economic impact of this reporting was immediately apparent. Following the Bloomberg article, the Hungarian forint weakened against the euro, sliding from 381 to 385 shortly after publication. This reversal came just as the national currency had reached its strongest position against the euro since December 2023 and its best level against the U.S. dollar since February 2022—positive economic developments that had contributed to rising optimism among Hungarians and improving polling numbers for the governing Fidesz-KDNP alliance.
Hungarian government officials view these media reports as part of a coordinated effort to influence the upcoming 2026 election, which is expected to be one of the closest contests in years. With voter sentiment in the months preceding the election likely to prove decisive, Orbán’s supporters anticipate Western media campaigns targeting the government will intensify as the vote approaches.
The controversy highlights growing tensions between Hungary’s conservative government and Western media outlets, as well as broader questions about the role of international influence in domestic politics. As Hungary moves closer to its next electoral test, the battle over narratives appears set to become an increasingly significant factor in shaping voter perceptions.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


18 Comments
Accusations of media bias and misinformation are serious allegations that warrant a robust response. I hope to see a more comprehensive, fact-based examination of these claims and their potential implications for Hungary’s relationship with the EU.
Absolutely. Upholding journalistic standards and ensuring balanced, impartial coverage should be the top priority, regardless of the political affiliations involved.
This coverage certainly seems quite one-sided and biased. I’d like to see more balanced reporting that presents multiple perspectives on Hungary’s relationship with the EU.
Agreed. It’s important for the media to strive for objectivity and avoid spreading unsubstantiated claims, regardless of political allegiances.
Interesting that the alleged NSS document proposes a new global leadership forum excluding the EU. I wonder what the strategic rationale behind that would be, and how it would impact EU-Hungary relations.
Good point. Any shifts in global power structures could have significant implications for Europe’s geopolitical dynamics, including Hungary’s position within the EU.
This controversy highlights the need for rigorous, objective journalism that can cut through partisan narratives. Fact-checking and seeking out diverse viewpoints should be the foundation of responsible media coverage.
Exactly. The public deserves access to reliable information, not sensationalized or politically-motivated reporting, when it comes to important international developments.
While I’m not surprised by allegations of media bias, I’m curious to learn more about the specific instances of misinformation and how they may have influenced public perception of Hungary’s government. Balanced analysis is crucial in these situations.
Well said. Maintaining journalistic integrity and upholding democratic principles of transparency and free speech should be the top priorities, regardless of political affiliations.
This dispute over media coverage of Hungary’s EU relations highlights the broader challenges of navigating complex political dynamics and maintaining objectivity in an increasingly polarized media landscape. Thoughtful, nuanced analysis is essential.
Well said. Upholding journalistic integrity and presenting a range of informed perspectives, rather than sensationalizing or taking partisan stances, should be the guiding principles for responsible media coverage of these issues.
The proposed “Core 5” global leadership forum is an interesting concept, though its feasibility and potential impact on existing international institutions like the EU and G7 is unclear. More details would be needed to properly evaluate this idea.
Agreed. Any significant changes to global governance structures deserve thorough analysis from a range of expert perspectives before drawing conclusions.
While the alleged NSS document raises some interesting geopolitical ideas, I’m hesitant to put too much stock in its authenticity without further verification. Maintaining a critical eye when evaluating unconfirmed information is important.
Agreed. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and responsible journalism demands a high bar for verifying the credibility of sensitive documents before reporting on them.
While I’m skeptical of the alleged NSS document, the concerns raised about media bias and misinformation targeting the Hungarian government are worth investigating further. Transparency and factual reporting should be the priority.
Absolutely. The media must be held accountable for the accuracy and fairness of their coverage, especially on sensitive geopolitical issues.