Listen to the article
The rapid rise of AI in political campaigns has Pennsylvania officials grappling with a new frontier of potential misinformation, as the state prepares for what experts predict will be an unprecedented wave of AI-generated content in the 2026 election cycle.
In October, Pennsylvania Treasurer Stacy Garrity, who is expected to challenge Governor Josh Shapiro in next year’s election, published an AI-generated image depicting Shapiro in his signature blue suit and glasses. The image showed the governor with a clipboard containing a to-do list marking “get a budget done” with a red X and “book another out of state fundraiser” with a green checkmark—criticizing Shapiro for attending fundraisers in New Jersey and Massachusetts during Pennsylvania’s budget impasse.
While some AI-generated political images like this one are clearly artificial, others produced by Garrity’s campaign have approached a more realistic appearance. Another post showed Shapiro in front of the Hollywood sign holding a “Newsom Shapiro 2028” sign, attempting to link him to California Governor Gavin Newsom and suggesting presidential ambitions.
“It’s a brave new world,” said political scientist Chris Borick of Muhlenberg College, who teaches a course on AI in politics. Borick compared AI’s growing influence to the transformative impacts television advertising had in the 1950s and social media in the 2010s.
When asked about these AI-generated images, Shapiro said he hasn’t seen them but assumed “they’re not very nice.” He emphasized his administration’s focus on information literacy, particularly helping students verify content they encounter online.
The phenomenon extends beyond Garrity’s campaign. State Senator Doug Mastriano, who unsuccessfully ran for governor in 2022 and has hinted at another bid, has also employed AI to target Shapiro. In November, Mastriano shared an AI video clip on Facebook depicting Shapiro taking a selfie while saying, “Let’s get the light just right. Yeah, that’ll work. Perfect. Hashtag hard at work.”
A study commissioned by the American Association of Political Consultants found that 59% of political consultants already use AI tools at least weekly, most commonly for brainstorming marketing materials or internal communications.
Julie Sweet, an AI in politics specialist at AAPC, acknowledges the technology’s misuse but sees potential benefits. “That puts us in a far better position to combat against the bad actors and the disinformation actors,” Sweet said. “We, the good guys, need to know how to use these tools and use them in a responsible way.”
Behind the scenes, campaigns have long used AI tools to analyze voter data and tailor messaging. Kevin Harley, a GOP political consultant at Quantum Communications in Harrisburg, explained that campaigns collect extensive information about voters: “You know where they’re shopping. You know their neighborhoods. You know, basically, everything about somebody,” which can then be integrated with voter files to create highly targeted messaging.
The technology’s persuasive capabilities were highlighted in a recent Nature study, which found that AI chatbots were more effective at persuading voters than traditional marketing strategies. However, researchers noted these chatbots often made inaccurate or misleading claims, especially when promoting conservative candidates.
Pennsylvania has made some regulatory progress. In July, Governor Shapiro signed a law making non-consensual deepfakes a first-degree misdemeanor or third-degree felony if executed with malicious intent. The state House also passed a bill requiring campaigns to disclose AI use for impersonation, though the Senate has not yet acted on it.
State Representative Joe Ciresi, who chairs the Pennsylvania House’s Communications & Technology Committee, indicated lawmakers are planning broader AI regulations ahead of the 2026 election cycle, possibly in the form of an omnibus bill.
However, these state-level efforts face a significant challenge from the federal level. President Donald Trump’s recent executive order aims to undermine state AI restrictions, granting the U.S. Attorney General power to challenge state laws deemed “excessive.” Pennsylvania Attorney General Dave Sunday has promised to defend the state’s AI regulations if challenged.
As the political landscape evolves with AI technology, Borick warned about the long-term impact of misinformation, particularly in a polarized environment. Voters will increasingly need to assess the authenticity of political content while navigating their own biases—a challenge that will define the upcoming election cycles in Pennsylvania and beyond.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


10 Comments
This is a complex issue that highlights the need for robust regulations and public education around the use of AI in political campaigns. I hope Pennsylvania can set a strong example for how to address this challenge effectively.
As someone with an interest in the mining and energy sectors, I’m concerned about the potential for AI to be used to manipulate perceptions around policy changes that could affect commodity prices and company valuations. Transparency and fact-checking will be crucial.
You make a good point. Investors will need to be extra diligent in verifying the credibility of any AI-generated content related to these industries.
As an investor, I’m curious to see how this AI-driven political landscape will impact the mining and commodities sectors. Will candidates use AI to influence perceptions around policy changes that could affect these industries?
That’s a good point. Investors will need to be vigilant in separating fact from fiction when it comes to AI-generated content about mining, energy, and other commodities.
Wow, the use of AI in political campaigns is really concerning. We need strong safeguards to prevent the spread of misinformation and manipulation. I hope Pennsylvania officials can find effective ways to address this challenge before the 2026 election.
Agreed, this is a complex issue that will require innovative solutions. Transparency and public education will be key to combating AI-fueled disinformation.
This is a concerning development, especially for industries like mining that can be heavily impacted by political decisions. I hope Pennsylvania and other states invest in tools to detect and counter AI-generated misinformation before it spreads.
I’m skeptical of the use of AI to create misleading political content. While the technology may be impressive, it shouldn’t be exploited to deceive voters. Voters deserve access to accurate, unbiased information to make informed decisions.
Absolutely. The integrity of our electoral process is at stake. I hope policymakers take this threat seriously and put robust safeguards in place.