Listen to the article
In a development that has sparked criticism over information sharing during emergency situations, President Donald Trump disseminated unverified information about an active shooter incident at Brown University while students were still sheltering in place.
The tragedy unfolded Saturday afternoon around 4 p.m. when an armed individual entered a classroom where approximately 60 students were attending a final exam review session for an Economics class. The attack resulted in two fatalities and nine injuries, according to official reports.
As the crisis was still unfolding and students remained barricaded inside campus buildings, Trump posted on his Truth Social platform at 5:44 p.m. claiming that a “suspect is in custody” and that he had been “briefed” on the situation. However, this information contradicted official campus alerts.
Just nine minutes after Trump’s post, at 5:53 p.m., Brown University’s Department of Public Safety issued an alert stating that the “situation remains ongoing,” according to the Brown Daily Herald, the university’s student newspaper. This discrepancy highlighted the dangers of sharing unconfirmed information during active emergency situations.
Trump later retracted his statement at 6:03 p.m., posting again that police had reversed their previous statement. This sequence of events created confusion during a critical time when accurate information was essential for student safety.
Students on campus quickly pushed back against the premature announcement. One student warned on social media: “I am at Brown University they have not confirmed a shooter in custody please do not believe Trump and stay inside.” The post reflected the real-time anxiety and potential danger caused by misinformation during active threat situations.
Providence Mayor Brett Smiley later addressed the information confusion during a press conference, emphasizing the importance of relying solely on official sources. “There is a lot of misinformation that can spread,” Smiley cautioned. “If it did not come from an official channel, it is not official.”
Law enforcement experts have long warned about the dangers of spreading unverified information during active shooter situations, as it can complicate response efforts, create unnecessary panic, or potentially endanger those sheltering in place by providing a false sense of security.
By Sunday morning, multiple news outlets confirmed that Providence police had indeed taken a suspect into custody, but this came hours after Trump’s initial premature announcement.
The incident at Brown adds to a troubling pattern of gun violence at American educational institutions. College campuses have implemented extensive emergency response protocols in recent years, including shelter-in-place procedures and mass notification systems, to address the ongoing threat of active shooter incidents.
The shooting occurred during one of the most stressful periods of the academic calendar – final exams – when campus buildings typically see increased student presence for review sessions and study groups. Brown University officials have announced that counseling services are being made available to all students, faculty, and staff affected by the tragedy.
This incident highlights the ongoing national debate about campus safety measures, gun violence prevention, and the responsible dissemination of information during crisis situations, particularly from high-profile figures whose statements can reach millions instantly and potentially impact emergency response efforts.
Law enforcement and university officials continue to investigate the motive behind the attack as the Brown University community begins the difficult process of mourning and recovery in the aftermath of this tragedy.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
While the president may have wanted to provide reassurance, releasing unsubstantiated details about an ongoing crisis was irresponsible. Authorities need to be the sole source of credible information in such situations.
Exactly. The president should have deferred to the university’s public safety department rather than posting unverified claims on social media. That could have hampered the emergency response.
The discrepancy between the president’s statement and the university’s alert is very troubling. Authorities need to coordinate closely and present a unified, fact-based message to the public.
Absolutely. Issuing contradictory information can undermine public trust and confidence in the emergency response. Transparency and accuracy should be the top priorities.
This incident highlights the need for clear communication protocols during crises. Officials must be disciplined about verifying information before sharing it publicly to avoid sowing confusion.
The discrepancy between the president’s statement and the university’s alerts is very concerning. In crisis situations, it’s crucial that authorities provide a unified, fact-based message to the public.
This is a concerning situation. Disseminating unverified information during an active emergency can create confusion and panic. It’s important for authorities to provide timely, accurate updates to the public.
You’re right, the president’s comments were premature and contradictory to official alerts. Sharing unconfirmed details can undermine emergency response efforts and public safety.
It’s concerning that the president would post unconfirmed details about an active shooter situation. That kind of premature speculation can be counterproductive and even dangerous.
This is a sobering reminder of the importance of relying on official, verified sources of information during emergencies. Spreading unsubstantiated claims, even inadvertently, can hinder the response efforts.
You’re right. The president’s comments were ill-advised and could have put lives at risk. Officials need to take the lead in communicating accurate, timely information to the public.