Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In the latest episode of rising tensions between federal authorities and local communities, the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti by Border Patrol agents in Minneapolis has become a flashpoint for conflicting narratives and widespread misinformation.

The 37-year-old ICU nurse was killed on Saturday after an encounter with Border Patrol agents that was captured on bystander video. The Department of Homeland Security claimed Sunday that Pretti had “approached US Border Patrol officers with a 9 mm semi-automatic handgun” and “violently resisted” attempts to disarm him.

However, video evidence analyzed by U.S. media outlets and Bellingcat, a respected Netherlands-based investigative journalism group, contradicts these claims. The footage shows Pretti initially filming the agents before stepping in to defend a woman who had been pushed to the ground. During the ensuing confrontation, at least five agents tackled him, and the analysis indicates his legally owned firearm had already been confiscated before he was shot multiple times.

Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara later confirmed to reporters that Pretti was a “lawful gun owner” with a valid permit and no criminal history beyond a few traffic violations.

Despite this evidence, high-ranking Trump administration officials have characterized the incident in starkly different terms. Border Patrol Commander at Large Greg Bovino claimed at a news conference that Pretti’s possession of a gun indicated he “wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement.”

Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff for policy and homeland security, went further, labeling Pretti an “assassin” who attempted to “murder federal agents.” DHS Secretary Kristi Noem supported these assertions, stating Pretti had “violently” resisted arrest.

The administration’s narrative has been amplified across right-wing social media. The influential “Libs of TikTok” account described Pretti as a “lunatic” and an “assassin,” while Alexander Muse told his 681,000 followers that Pretti was “expecting a firefight at a distance” with federal agents—a claim unsupported by available evidence.

Some prominent conservative voices have introduced additional false information. Nick Sorter, a Trump ally with 1.4 million followers on X, incorrectly claimed Pretti was an “illegal alien” who attempted to draw his weapon on agents. Conservative podcaster Jesse Kelly characterized the American citizen as a “soldier for the communist revolution.”

Digitally altered images purporting to show Pretti in female clothing have also circulated among MAGA-affiliated accounts, further muddying the public understanding of events.

In response, Pretti’s parents released a statement describing their son as a “kindhearted soul” and condemning the “sickening lies” about him as “reprehensible and disgusting.”

The pattern of labeling victims as “domestic terrorists” mirrors the case of Renee Good, another 37-year-old shot by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis earlier this month. Administration officials described Good as a “terrorist” attempting to run over an officer, despite video evidence contradicting these assertions.

This approach extends beyond individual cases to broader attempts at discrediting protests against the administration’s immigration policies. Last week, the White House shared an AI-altered image of arrested activist Nekima Levy Armstrong, manipulated to make her appear emotionally distressed.

Not all conservatives have endorsed the administration’s narrative. Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie stated on X that “carrying a firearm is not a death sentence, it’s a Constitutionally protected God-given right.” Even the National Rifle Association rejected suggestions that approaching law enforcement while armed justifies lethal force.

The controversy has also exposed tensions between federal and local authorities. Minnesota officials have disputed Vice President JD Vance’s claim that local law enforcement refused to assist federal counterparts in the investigation. The Minnesota Department of Public Safety Bureau of Criminal Apprehension countered that it was actually state authorities who were denied access to the crime scene by DHS officials.

As investigations continue, the divergent accounts of Pretti’s death highlight growing divisions over immigration enforcement policies and the use of force by federal agents in American communities.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

14 Comments

  1. Jennifer Thomas on

    The discrepancies between the official narrative and the video evidence are troubling. A full, impartial investigation is crucial to determine the facts and ensure justice is served. Restoring public confidence in law enforcement will be key moving forward.

    • I agree. Transparency and accountability must be the top priorities here. The public deserves to know the truth, regardless of how uncomfortable it may be for the authorities.

  2. Elijah Hernandez on

    This is a complex and sensitive situation. While the details are still emerging, the loss of life is always tragic. I hope the investigation provides clarity and leads to constructive reforms to improve interactions between law enforcement and local communities, and to build trust.

  3. Liam V. Hernandez on

    The discrepancies between the official claims and the video evidence are deeply concerning. If the authorities are found to have misled the public, it would be a serious breach of trust. A thorough, independent investigation is crucial to uncover the truth and ensure justice is served.

    • Well said. Transparency and accountability must be the top priorities here. The public deserves an accurate, unbiased account of what happened, regardless of how uncomfortable it may be for the authorities.

  4. This is a complex and sensitive situation. While the details are still emerging, the loss of life is always tragic. I hope the investigation provides clarity and leads to constructive reforms to improve interactions between law enforcement and local communities.

  5. Michael Johnson on

    This situation is deeply concerning. If the video evidence contradicts the official DHS claims, it raises serious questions about transparency and accountability in law enforcement interactions with the public. Thorough, independent investigation is crucial to uncover the truth.

    • Amelia Thompson on

      I agree. Discrepancies between official statements and video footage are worrying and warrant close scrutiny. The public deserves a full, impartial account of what transpired.

  6. William M. Johnson on

    It’s troubling to see such conflicting narratives around this incident. While the details are still emerging, the loss of life is always tragic. I hope the investigation provides clarity and leads to constructive reforms to build trust between authorities and local communities.

    • Michael K. Lopez on

      Well said. Transparency and accountability must be the priorities here to understand what really happened and prevent similar outcomes in the future.

  7. Patricia Smith on

    This is a troubling situation. The loss of life is always tragic, and the conflicting narratives raise serious questions about the actions of law enforcement. I hope the investigation provides clarity and leads to constructive reforms to build trust between authorities and local communities.

  8. The apparent discrepancies between the official claims and the video evidence are deeply concerning. If the authorities are found to have misled the public, it would be a serious breach of trust. A thorough, impartial investigation is crucial to uncover the truth and ensure accountability.

    • I agree. Transparency and a commitment to the facts must be the priorities here. The public deserves an accurate, unbiased account of the events, regardless of the implications for the authorities involved.

  9. This is a concerning development. If the official claims are indeed false, it would be a serious breach of public trust. I hope the authorities take swift action to thoroughly investigate the incident and provide the public with an accurate, unbiased account of the events.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.