Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Mistrust and Poor Communication Drive Vaccine Booster Hesitancy Among Older Adults, Study Finds

A groundbreaking study from St Mary’s University in London has identified that mistrust, misinformation, and ineffective communication are primary factors behind COVID-19 booster refusal among adults over 50, with these issues particularly pronounced in ethnically diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged communities.

The research, dubbed the TRUST Study, reveals that vaccine hesitancy stems from a complex interplay of psychological, social, and practical considerations rather than single isolated concerns. Researchers aimed to enhance future booster campaigns by understanding these multifaceted barriers to vaccination.

Conducting in-depth online interviews with 30 adults aged over 50 in London and the West Midlands who had declined COVID-19 boosters, investigators uncovered four central themes influencing vaccine decisions: concerns about vaccine production and administration; health misinformation circulating through social networks; personal circumstances and social influences; and policy and logistical barriers to vaccine access.

“Our findings show that vaccine hesitancy is not simply lack of information,” explained Samual Lam, Research Fellow at St Mary’s University’s School of Allied Health and Life Science. “Many participants described feeling excluded from public health conversations or unsure whether messaging reflected their lived experience. Building trust requires listening, transparency, and communication that speaks to different communities in meaningful ways.”

The research indicates that mistrust extends beyond vaccines themselves to encompass broader healthcare systems. Many participants reported feeling unheard or marginalized during public health campaigns, suggesting that future initiatives must prioritize inclusive communication strategies that respect diverse perspectives.

Dr. Silvia Riva, Associate Professor in Psychology at St Mary’s University and Principal Investigator, highlighted the cultural dimensions affecting vaccine acceptance: “Mistrust is influenced by cultural practices and the knowledge schemas through which individuals interpret scientific information. In many cultural contexts, science is commonly understood as a gradual process involving time, trials, and errors.”

The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, while representing a remarkable scientific achievement, may have inadvertently fueled skepticism among populations accustomed to more prolonged development timelines. This disconnect between public expectations and pandemic-driven scientific acceleration created a trust gap that health communicators struggled to bridge.

These findings arrive at a critical juncture for public health initiatives. With seasonal vaccination campaigns continuing and the potential for future pandemic responses, understanding the nuanced reasons behind vaccine hesitancy could prove invaluable for health authorities and policymakers.

The implications extend far beyond COVID-19 vaccination efforts. Researchers suggest their findings could inform more effective approaches to annual flu vaccination campaigns and other public health initiatives, particularly when engaging hard-to-reach populations.

Funded through an unconditional research grant from pharmaceutical company Moderna, the study demonstrates how academic institutions can partner with industry while maintaining scientific independence. This collaboration allowed St Mary’s researchers to focus on public insight and health equity while exploring sensitive issues around vaccine confidence.

The complete study, titled “Barriers to equitable COVID-19 booster uptake among adults aged 50 and older in the UK: psychological factors and misinformation influencing vaccine hesitancy,” has now been published, providing valuable insights for healthcare professionals, policymakers, and communicators working to improve vaccination rates across diverse populations.

As health systems worldwide continue navigating the challenges of vaccine hesitancy, this research underscores the importance of building trust through culturally sensitive communication, addressing misinformation effectively, and creating accessible vaccination pathways that consider the varied circumstances of all community members.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

14 Comments

  1. Isabella Taylor on

    The study’s focus on the challenges faced by ethnically diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged communities is particularly important. Addressing these disparities should be a key priority for public health efforts.

    • Agreed. Ensuring equitable access and building trust in these marginalized groups will be crucial for improving overall vaccination rates.

  2. This research underscores the need for a more comprehensive and empathetic approach to vaccine hesitancy. Simplistic messaging or mandates are unlikely to be effective if the underlying concerns are not properly addressed.

    • Well said. A nuanced, community-driven strategy that considers the unique barriers faced by different groups is essential for boosting vaccine confidence and uptake.

  3. Noah D. Thompson on

    The findings on the role of misinformation circulating through social networks are particularly concerning. Combating health-related disinformation will be crucial to improving vaccine confidence in this age group.

    • Robert Rodriguez on

      Absolutely. Targeted efforts to counter misinformation and improve digital literacy could go a long way in addressing this issue.

  4. This research provides valuable insights into the nuanced reasons behind COVID-19 booster hesitancy among older adults. Addressing the psychological, social, and logistical factors will be essential for designing more impactful public health campaigns.

    • Liam Hernandez on

      Agreed. Focusing solely on vaccine safety and efficacy messaging may not be enough. Understanding the complex interplay of concerns is key to developing more effective interventions.

  5. Michael Thompson on

    The study’s findings on the role of personal circumstances and social influences in vaccine decision-making are particularly insightful. Addressing these broader contextual factors will be key to improving booster coverage.

    • Patricia R. Jones on

      Absolutely. Taking a more holistic, person-centered approach that considers individual and community-level barriers is crucial for developing effective interventions.

  6. Interesting study on the complex factors behind adult vaccine hesitancy. Mistrust, misinformation, and ineffective communication seem to be key drivers. Addressing these multifaceted issues will be crucial for improving booster uptake, especially in disadvantaged communities.

    • You’re right, the study highlights the importance of tailored communication strategies to build trust and overcome practical barriers. A one-size-fits-all approach likely won’t be effective.

  7. Olivia O. Thompson on

    It’s encouraging to see research delving into the nuanced factors behind vaccine hesitancy. A more holistic approach to understanding and addressing these barriers is clearly needed.

    • Jennifer Jones on

      Definitely. This type of in-depth qualitative research can help inform more tailored, community-based strategies to boost vaccine uptake.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.