Listen to the article
Nigerian Media Perpetuates False Claims About Morocco’s Football Team
A troubling wave of misinformation has swept through Nigerian media following the Confederation of African Football’s appeal board decision to award Morocco a default victory over Senegal on March 17. The incident highlights growing concerns about journalistic standards and information verification in the digital age.
The cascade of false information began with Nigeria’s public news service, the News Agency of Nigeria, which circulated an unfounded claim that Morocco had abandoned a match against Guinea during the 1976 Africa Cup of Nations. Despite clear refutations from credible sources including Yabiladi, TV5Monde, and Al Mountakhab, which provided archival evidence disproving the claim, the fabrication was widely republished by Nigerian media outlets without fact-checking.
Within 48 hours, the situation worsened as the same agency disseminated another piece of misinformation—a completely fabricated statement attributed to Moroccan captain Achraf Hakimi. According to the false report, Hakimi had supposedly rejected the continental title in solidarity with Senegal, claiming, “My mother told me to refuse the Africa Cup of Nations trophy. I officially refuse it, and I hope my teammates will do the same.”
This fictional quote rapidly gained traction after being published by multiple Nigerian news organizations including PM News Nigeria, The Sun, The Nigerian Observer, and Peoples Gazette Nigeria. The falsehood was further legitimized when prominent public figures amplified it. Senator Shehu Sani’s post on X (formerly Twitter) garnered 2.3 million views, while communicator Bashir Ahmad, who claims close ties to former President Muhammadu Buhari, also shared the false information.
The misinformation quickly transcended Nigeria’s borders, appearing in media outlets across Africa including Ghana, Kenya, Zimbabwe, and Benin. Soon after, international media in Turkey, Uzbekistan, the Czech Republic, and Vietnam were also reporting the fabricated story as fact.
A simple verification would have revealed that Hakimi had made no such statement on any platform. The player’s official social media accounts contained no trace of these alleged comments, yet media organizations continued to embellish the story with additional invented details.
Media analysts note this case demonstrates a classic misinformation pattern: an unverified dispatch from a seemingly credible source, followed by widespread media republication without basic fact-checking, validation through endorsement by public figures, and eventual international proliferation.
The episode raises particular concerns about the News Agency of Nigeria’s role as a public institution. As the country’s official news service, it bears special responsibility for information integrity. This double failure within a 48-hour period suggests serious lapses in editorial standards that merit institutional review.
“This is especially troubling coming from a public entity whose primary function is to filter and verify information before dissemination,” said a regional media watchdog representative who requested anonymity. “Whether motivated by negligence or engagement metrics, the outcome undermines public trust in news institutions.”
The incident reflects broader challenges in today’s media ecosystem, where information credibility increasingly depends on the messenger rather than the evidence. In this interconnected information landscape, a single dispatch from a seemingly authoritative source can fabricate a reality that quickly becomes accepted as fact.
Media experts emphasize that such cases highlight the urgent need for strengthened verification protocols, especially among national news agencies that serve as information gatekeepers. As traditional media faces increasing competition from social platforms, maintaining rigorous fact-checking standards becomes not just a journalistic principle but a public service essential for combating the growing global “infodemic.”
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

