Misinformation: Its Creators, Consumers, and Countermeasures – Ripon College CPP Lecture

WisconsinEye Faces Critical Funding Shortage, Government Transparency at Risk

The state’s only independent public affairs network, WisconsinEye, has announced it needs $1 million in operational funding within the next year to avoid potential service reductions or a complete shutdown. The network, which provides live, unedited coverage of Wisconsin state government proceedings, warns that its financial situation has become urgent.

“Without immediate funding, the network faces potential reductions in coverage – or complete shutdown – jeopardizing public access to live, unedited coverage of state government,” a network spokesperson said in a statement released Thursday.

Founded in 2007, WisconsinEye has established itself as a vital resource for citizens, journalists, educators, and policymakers seeking transparent access to the workings of state government. The network broadcasts legislative sessions, committee hearings, Supreme Court arguments, and other civic events, serving as Wisconsin’s equivalent to C-SPAN at the state level.

The funding crisis comes at a time when public trust in government institutions and traditional media outlets has declined nationwide. According to a 2023 Gallup poll, only 34% of Americans report having a “great deal” or “fair amount” of trust in mass media, highlighting the importance of direct, unfiltered access to government proceedings.

“We remain unwavering in our commitment to transparency and accountability in state government,” the network stated, emphasizing that its mission continues despite financial challenges.

Political science professor Jennifer Markowitz from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who was not affiliated with the announcement, told reporters that WisconsinEye’s potential closure would create a significant gap in government accessibility.

“When you remove a service like WisconsinEye, you’re essentially placing government activities behind a visibility barrier,” Markowitz explained. “This particularly impacts rural communities and individuals who can’t physically attend sessions in Madison but want to stay informed about policies affecting their lives.”

The network operates as a private, nonprofit service and receives no direct government funding, relying instead on private donations, foundation grants, and limited corporate sponsorships. This funding model was initially designed to maintain editorial independence, but has proven challenging to sustain in a changing media landscape.

WisconsinEye’s financial struggles mirror those faced by similar state-level public affairs networks across the country. In recent years, networks in Connecticut, Washington, and Pennsylvania have all faced significant funding challenges, with some scaling back operations or seeking new funding mechanisms to remain viable.

Media experts point to several factors contributing to these difficulties, including the fragmentation of viewing audiences, reduced corporate and foundation giving, and the high operational costs of maintaining broadcast-quality coverage across multiple government venues.

The potential loss of WisconsinEye would also impact the state’s historical record. Since its founding, the network has built an extensive archive of government proceedings, creating what amounts to a visual history of Wisconsin governance that researchers and historians regularly access.

The network has launched a fundraising campaign and is appealing directly to viewers, civic organizations, and potential corporate sponsors for support. It has also created a dedicated donation portal on its website to facilitate contributions.

“With your help, WisconsinEye can continue its mission and secure its future,” the network stated in its appeal to the public.

For those interested in accessing WisconsinEye’s archived content, the network maintains a user registration system that provides free accounts. Questions about the service or the current funding situation can be directed to the organization via email.

State lawmakers have not yet publicly addressed whether emergency funding options might be considered to maintain the service, which many legislators themselves use to review proceedings and communicate with constituents.