Listen to the article
India’s Misinformation Crisis: A Threat to Social Fabric and Democratic Norms
India’s position as one of the world’s most connected societies has created a paradox: while information has become abundant, trust has grown increasingly fragile. The spread of misinformation across the country is no longer just a matter of misleading individuals—it is fundamentally reshaping relationships, institutions, and the democratic process itself.
Recent data from the Pew Research Center highlights the severity of the situation. In a 35-country survey conducted in spring 2024, 65% of Indians identified “made-up news and information” as a “very big problem,” with 81% considering it at least a moderately significant issue. These figures place India among nations where approximately two-thirds of citizens view misinformation as a serious national concern.
The scale of potential exposure is staggering. Government data shows India had 954.4 million internet subscribers as of March 2024, including 398.35 million rural subscribers. By September 2024, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) estimated this number had grown to 971.5 million. Independent reports project 806 million internet users by early 2025, with approximately 491 million social media user identities.
“When a country has around one billion internet subscriptions and hundreds of millions on social platforms, misinformation is no longer simply an ‘online’ problem—it becomes a mass behavior problem,” explains a digital media analyst who studies information trends across South Asia.
Public anxiety about false information isn’t new. Even in 2019, Pew found that 77% of Indians expressed concern about people being exposed to misinformation through mobile phones.
India faces a perfect storm of conditions that enable misinformation to thrive. With its massive scale and rapid information flow, falsehoods can reach millions almost instantly. Perhaps more critically, misinformation often spreads through trusted networks—family members, neighbors, community leaders—making it resistant to fact-checking efforts.
The country’s linguistic diversity creates additional challenges. Misinformation debunked in one language or region can continue spreading unchecked elsewhere, creating information silos that resist correction. Meanwhile, social media algorithms prioritize emotional engagement, structurally amplifying content that triggers outrage, fear, or moral certainty.
This combination of factors explains why global institutions like the World Economic Forum have ranked misinformation among the top short-term global risks in both its 2024 and 2025 Global Risks Reports.
The damage caused by misinformation operates at multiple levels. Psychologically, it creates a state of perpetual doubt, training people to distrust established sources while offering alternative “truths” based on identity rather than evidence. Individuals may suffer financial losses from scams, health consequences from medical misinformation, or reputational damage from fabricated claims.
Within families, misinformation becomes a relationship toxin. What begins as forwarded messages on WhatsApp can escalate into heated arguments about politics, religion, or medicine. These conflicts often represent deeper questions about trust and identity, gradually eroding family bonds.
At the societal level, misinformation fractures the shared understanding of reality that democracies require to function. When citizens no longer agree on basic facts, constructive debate about solutions becomes impossible.
India has already witnessed the real-world consequences of this problem. Multiple incidents of mob violence and lynchings have been linked to false rumors spread through messaging platforms, demonstrating how online misinformation can translate into physical harm.
The democratic implications are particularly concerning. Misinformation becomes a threat to democratic institutions when it delegitimizes established institutions, dehumanizes political opponents, and justifies extraordinary actions outside normal democratic processes.
Pew’s research reveals a troubling correlation: in many countries, people who view misinformation as a major problem also report lower satisfaction with democratic functioning. This pattern has manifested dramatically in other democracies, from the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack in the United States to the January 8, 2023 government building storming in Brazil—both fueled by false claims about election integrity.
Addressing this challenge requires a multi-faceted approach that balances free speech with harm reduction. Media literacy must be treated as essential civic infrastructure, particularly in regional languages. Platform algorithms need greater transparency and accountability, especially regarding political, health, and financial content.
Fact-checking ecosystems must be strengthened while maintaining their credibility and independence. Regulatory approaches should focus on specific harms—such as impersonation, manipulated media used to incite violence, and dangerous medical falsehoods—rather than broad content restrictions that could chill legitimate speech.
As one democracy expert notes, “Misinformation cannot be eliminated, but it can be contained, much like societies contain disease: by strengthening immunity, reducing exposure, and responding quickly to outbreaks.”
The future of Indian democracy may well depend on whether citizens can restore a shared understanding of reality—a foundation upon which meaningful democratic debate can occur.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
13 Comments
This article highlights the delicate balance between technological progress and the preservation of truth. As India’s digital connectivity expands, the battle against misinformation must evolve alongside it.
Well said. Ensuring that the benefits of increased connectivity are not undermined by the spread of falsehoods should be a key priority for policymakers and tech companies alike.
This is a concerning issue for India’s democracy. Misinformation can have a corrosive effect on public discourse and trust in institutions. Addressing this challenge requires a multi-pronged approach of digital literacy, platform accountability, and fact-checking efforts.
Agreed. With over 950 million internet users, the potential for misinformation to spread rapidly is immense. Tackling this issue will be crucial to safeguarding India’s democratic foundations.
The Pew Research Center’s findings on Indian public perception of misinformation are quite sobering. It’s clear that this issue has become a major concern for citizens across the country.
Absolutely. With the rapid growth of internet access, addressing the spread of misinformation must be a top priority to protect India’s democratic institutions and social cohesion.
The scale of India’s misinformation problem, with nearly 1 billion internet users, is truly staggering. Tackling this issue will require a coordinated, multi-stakeholder effort to promote digital literacy and media accountability.
This article provides a valuable insight into the complex challenges India faces in combating the spread of misinformation. Maintaining trust and truth in the digital age is a critical task for policymakers and tech companies alike.
The statistics on Indian public perception of misinformation are quite striking. It’s clear this is a major societal concern that requires concerted action from both the government and technology companies.
Absolutely. The high level of public awareness is a positive sign, but translating that into meaningful solutions to combat the problem will be the real challenge.
This article highlights the complex challenges India faces in maintaining the integrity of its information ecosystem. Balancing technological progress with the preservation of truth is a delicate and critical task.
Misinformation can have severe consequences for a country’s social fabric and democratic processes. India’s experience underscores the urgent need for robust fact-checking mechanisms and greater platform responsibility in the digital age.
Agreed. The government, tech companies, and civil society must work together to combat the spread of online falsehoods and safeguard the integrity of India’s public discourse.