Listen to the article
In the wake of a tragic shooting in Tumbler Ridge, B.C., disinformation experts are warning about the dangerous consequences of online rush to identify suspects before official information is released.
The RCMP recently highlighted a disturbing case where an Ontario woman became the target of false accusations in connection with the shootings. On Friday, RCMP Deputy Commissioner Dwayne McDonald released a confirmed photo of the actual shooter, Jesse Van Rootselaar, while explicitly noting that a person named Zylii Strang had been wrongfully implicated despite having no connection to the case.
“Zylii — this did not need to happen. We know you are not involved,” McDonald stated during the press briefing.
Ahmed Al-Rawi, a professor in the communication department at Simon Fraser University and director of the Disinformation Project, pointed to underlying prejudices as a key factor in the spread of misinformation. After it emerged that the shooter was transgender, images of innocent transgender individuals began circulating online.
“Some people spread these images due to their biases and prejudices,” Al-Rawi explained. He added that the motivations behind such behavior vary, with some seeking viral content for financial gain while others become entangled in conspiracy theories.
The phenomenon of public speculation following tragic events is not new, according to Heidi Tworek, an assistant professor at the University of British Columbia’s School of Public Policy and Global Affairs. However, she notes that social media has “massively accelerated” this tendency.
“We’ve seen in multiple cases, not just this one, these misidentifications of people that have had tremendous deleterious consequences for those innocent individuals who are not at all connected to these tragedies,” Tworek said. “The speed at which official investigations can move versus how fast people want to know things always creates this kind of base in which conspiracy theories flourish.”
The misidentification appears to have stemmed from a name similarity. Deputy Commissioner McDonald explained that Zylii Strang shared a similar surname with someone associated with the crime—Jesse Van Rootselaar’s mother, Jennifer Jacobs, who also went by Jennifer Strang.
The false accusations gained significant traction online, prompting B.C. resident Melissa Antoinette to launch a campaign across Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok urging people to remove the misleading images of Strang.
“I feel absolutely terrible for anybody to have their image attached to any sort of horrific event or anything that they didn’t do,” Antoinette said. She described witnessing “so much hate” in online comments that she felt compelled to report some of them to social media platforms.
The human toll of this misidentification is substantial. According to Agence France-Presse, Krista Strang, Zylii’s mother, reported that her 25-year-old daughter was “devastated” and afraid to leave her home after being wrongfully implicated. Krista Strang expressed bewilderment at how her daughter became linked to the crime, suggesting it may have been simply because her child is transgender and shares the last name Strang.
The incident has also sparked broader discussions about prejudice against transgender individuals. Mark Deeley, a teacher at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School who has been hailed as a hero for protecting his class during the shooting, spoke out against using the tragedy as an excuse for transphobia.
“I do not and will not exacerbate the intolerance with hate. My humanity refuses it,” Deeley wrote on Facebook on Sunday. He emphasized that love is the only effective response to combat hate, adding, “We need voices that are louder than those who would deny someone’s right to exist as their true self.”
Deputy Commissioner McDonald acknowledged that the significant public attention surrounding the incident has heightened concerns in many Canadian communities. “We are mindful that public and media response and coverage can increase false reports, but can also bring forward serious complaints,” he said.
The case highlights the growing tension between the public’s desire for immediate information following tragic events and the methodical pace of official investigations—a gap increasingly filled by speculation and misinformation in the digital age.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
This is a concerning case of online misinformation and unfounded accusations. It’s crucial that people rely on official sources and avoid rushing to judgment before all the facts are known. Spreading unverified information, especially about sensitive topics, can have serious consequences.
Agreed. Responsible reporting and fact-checking are essential to avoid causing further harm to innocent individuals. Social media platforms need to do more to curb the spread of misinformation.
The importance of relying on official sources and avoiding premature judgments is well-emphasized here. Misinformation can have devastating impacts, particularly when it involves marginalized communities. This case underscores the need for greater digital literacy and a more thoughtful approach to sharing information online.
Agreed. Fact-checking and responsible sharing of information should be a priority, especially on sensitive topics. The consequences of getting it wrong can be severe, as this case clearly demonstrates.
This is a concerning situation that highlights the very real risks of online misinformation and the targeting of vulnerable groups. The experts’ advice to exercise caution and restraint is well-founded. We must do more to combat the spread of unverified claims and foster a more responsible digital ecosystem.
This is a sobering reminder of the dangers of misinformation, especially when it targets vulnerable groups. The experts are right to call for responsible reporting and a more measured approach to sensitive situations. We must do better at verifying facts and resisting the urge to spread unconfirmed narratives.
The experts raise valid points about the risks of online ‘blame games’ and the underlying biases that can fuel the spread of misinformation. In sensitive cases like this, caution and restraint are critical to prevent further damage.
Absolutely. Jumping to conclusions based on limited or unverified information can lead to very real and harmful consequences for innocent people. We need to be more vigilant about fact-checking before sharing content online.