Listen to the article
Minnesota Corrections Department Launches Fact-Checking Site Amid ICE Controversy
The Minnesota Department of Corrections has established a dedicated web page to provide accurate information about the state’s cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), challenging what it calls “repeated false or misleading claims” by the Department of Homeland Security.
This initiative comes in the aftermath of a fatal shooting involving U.S. Customs and Border Patrol in Minneapolis. On January 24, Minnesota resident Alex Pretti was killed during a federal operation, sparking renewed scrutiny of federal immigration enforcement activities in the state.
“The loss of life is tragic, and Minnesotans deserve transparency, accountability, and facts,” the DOC stated in its announcement. The agency emphasized that the new resource was created specifically to counter inaccurate assertions about Minnesota’s custody procedures, detainer policies, and cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
Following Pretti’s shooting, U.S. Border Patrol Chief Gregory Bovino held a press conference claiming the operation targeted an individual named Jose Huerta-Chuma, whom he described as having a significant criminal history. This characterization prompted the Minnesota DOC to review its records to verify whether the referenced individual had any connection to the state’s prison system.
According to the department’s investigation of DOC records and publicly available court data, Huerta-Chuma has never been in Minnesota DOC custody. State records show no felony commitments associated with him, and public Minnesota court records reveal only misdemeanor-level traffic offenses from more than a decade ago. Additionally, the individual is not currently under DOC supervision.
The department also noted that records indicate someone by this name was previously held in federal immigration custody in a local Minnesota jail in 2018, during the Trump administration. “Any decisions regarding release from federal custody at that time would have been made by federal authorities. DOC has no information explaining why this individual was released,” the agency stated.
The controversy intensified when Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem publicly claimed that the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension investigators would be barred from investigating the shooting because the state “refuses to cooperate with ICE.” The DOC flatly rejected this assertion, stating: “That statement is incorrect.”
The department emphasized that Minnesota does cooperate with ICE to facilitate custody transfers for individuals subject to federal detainers. This cooperation was publicly confirmed on January 22 by Marcos Charles, Acting Executive Associate Director of ICE, during a federal press conference, and subsequently by Vice President J.D. Vance in his remarks the same day.
“The inaccurate assertions of these high-level ICE officials are untrue, reckless, and contrary to longstanding practice,” the DOC stated.
The newly launched web page serves as a comprehensive information hub, featuring verified data on non-citizens in state custody, press releases correcting information about DHS’s “worst of the worst” lists, and videos—including footage of a recent press conference and custody transfers—that directly contradict claims about lack of coordination between the DOC and ICE.
This public information campaign reflects growing tensions between state and federal authorities over immigration enforcement policies. Similar disputes have emerged in other states as local and federal agencies navigate their respective roles in immigration matters amid heightened political sensitivity surrounding border security and immigration enforcement.
“DOC will continue to review facts carefully, correct the record when necessary, and share accurate, verifiable information with the media and the public,” the agency concluded, signaling its commitment to maintaining transparency in the face of what it perceives as misinformation from federal officials.
The situation highlights the complex interplay between state corrections systems and federal immigration enforcement, especially when high-profile incidents bring these relationships under public scrutiny.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
13 Comments
While the DOC’s intentions seem good, I imagine this effort will still face pushback from those who are skeptical of the government’s motives. Navigating these charged debates requires nuance and open communication.
The new webpage seems like a reasonable effort to address misinformation. I’ll be interested to see how it’s received and if it helps resolve some of the ongoing disputes around immigration enforcement in Minnesota.
This is a complex topic with strong opinions on all sides. I appreciate the state’s effort to counter false narratives and present the facts as they see them. Hopefully this helps inform the ongoing debate.
Fact-checking and myth-busting around immigration enforcement is crucial. Kudos to the Minnesota DOC for taking this proactive approach.
It’s encouraging to see a state agency proactively addressing misinformation and providing a centralized resource for the public. Fact-based dialogue is crucial for building trust and finding common ground.
Absolutely. Fostering informed, evidence-based discussions on complex issues like this is key to productive policymaking and community relations.
The tragic loss of life following the federal operation is concerning. I’m curious to learn more about the state’s cooperation policies and how they aim to balance public safety with individual rights.
Good point. Transparency around these policies and procedures could help the public better understand the state’s approach and any potential tradeoffs.
Glad to see the Minnesota Department of Corrections taking steps to provide accurate information about their ICE cooperation policies. Transparency is important, especially around sensitive immigration enforcement issues.
Agree, the public deserves clear facts rather than misleading claims. Transparency can help build trust between government agencies and the community.
Providing clear, factual information is an important step, but it remains to be seen if this will quell the controversy or if the debate will continue. Kudos to the DOC for trying to get ahead of the narrative.
Establishing a dedicated resource to address these claims is a prudent move. Minnesotans deserve to have access to reliable information from credible government sources on this sensitive issue.
Agreed. Transparency and accuracy should be the priority, regardless of one’s political views on immigration enforcement.