Listen to the article
Bill Gates Admits He Was “Very Wrong” About Information Access and Misinformation
Microsoft founder Bill Gates has acknowledged a significant miscalculation in his long-held belief about information accessibility, admitting he was “very wrong” to assume that making information widely available would naturally lead people to seek out accurate facts.
In a recent interview with CNBC, Gates revealed his previous naivety regarding how people consume information in the digital age. “When we made information available, I thought people would want correct information,” Gates said, reflecting on his earlier assumptions about the democratization of knowledge through technology.
The billionaire philanthropist now views misinformation as a growing problem that’s being passed on to younger generations, with concerning implications for society. His admission represents a striking evolution in thinking for someone who helped pioneer the information technology revolution.
Gates explained that he underestimated the powerful pull of confirmation bias—the tendency for people to seek out and embrace information that reinforces their existing beliefs and worldviews. He candidly admitted his own susceptibility to this phenomenon, saying, “But even I wallow. If there’s a politician I don’t like, and there’s an article criticizing him—even if exaggerated—I enjoy reading it.”
His perspective shifted further after hearing about his daughter Phoebe Gates’ experiences with online harassment. Phoebe, co-founder of AI shopping tool Phia, has previously spoken about being “memed” for her interracial relationship, highlighting the personal toll that misinformation and online abuse can take. These experiences provided Gates with a more intimate understanding of how digital platforms can amplify harmful content.
Despite these challenges, Gates sees potential in artificial intelligence as a tool to combat misinformation and manage deepfakes. He suggested that AI systems could help enforce regulations around harmful content online, such as incitement to violence or vaccine misinformation.
“We should have free speech. But if you’re inciting violence, if you’re causing people not to take vaccines, where are those boundaries? Even the U.S. should have rules. And if you have rules, is it some AI that encodes those rules?” Gates questioned, pointing to the complex balance between free expression and harmful content.
Gates also acknowledged that combating misinformation will be an ongoing challenge, with new detection methods constantly being challenged by evolving countermeasures. In a 2023 blog post, he wrote: “It won’t be a perfect success, but we won’t be helpless either,” suggesting a pragmatic approach to this digital-age problem.
Meanwhile, Phoebe Gates has made headlines in her own right, recently securing $30 million in funding for her AI shopping startup, Phia. The investment values the company at $180 million, marking a significant achievement for the young entrepreneur.
Interestingly, while Bill Gates has not invested financially in his daughter’s venture, he has contributed his time and expertise. Earlier this year, the tech billionaire took to LinkedIn to share that he had worked a customer service shift to support the team following the app’s launch.
“I’ve entered the startup world again,” Gates wrote on LinkedIn, accompanied by a short video of his customer service experience. “When your daughter asks if you’d be willing to work a shift in customer service at her startup, the only right answer is yes.”
Gates’ evolving perspective on information and misinformation comes at a critical time when society continues to grapple with the implications of widespread digital connectivity and the rapid development of artificial intelligence technologies. His reflections highlight the unexpected challenges that have emerged from the information revolution he helped create, and point to the ongoing need for thoughtful approaches to technology governance in the years ahead.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
22 Comments
Gates’ candid admission highlights the need for a more holistic approach to information dissemination and consumption. Confirmation bias is a stubborn human trait that tech alone cannot overcome.
Interesting to see Gates acknowledge his past assumptions about information access were too simplistic. The rise of misinformation is a real challenge that requires a more nuanced understanding of human psychology and behavior.
Agreed. Gates’ admission shows even tech pioneers can evolve their views as they witness the real-world impacts of the systems they helped create.
This is a candid and insightful reflection from Gates. Confirmation bias is a powerful force, and the democratization of information has not necessarily led to more fact-based decision making as previously hoped.
It’s encouraging to see someone of Gates’ stature be so transparent about their mistaken assumptions. Addressing misinformation will require a multi-faceted approach.
Gates’ change in perspective is a valuable lesson. Easy access to information does not automatically translate to people seeking out objective truth. Tackling misinformation will be an ongoing challenge.
Absolutely. Technological advances alone are not enough – we need to better understand human psychology and information consumption habits to combat the spread of misinformation.
Interesting to see a tech pioneer like Gates acknowledge the limitations of their previous assumptions. Addressing misinformation requires a nuanced understanding of human behavior and information consumption habits.
Absolutely. This is a valuable lesson for anyone working to improve information access and quality in the digital age.
This is a valuable lesson in the limitations of technological progress. Gates’ admission shows even pioneers can underestimate the human factors at play in information consumption.
Absolutely. Tackling misinformation requires a deeper understanding of psychology, social dynamics, and the complexities of human behavior.
Interesting to see a tech pioneer like Gates acknowledge the limitations of their previous assumptions. Addressing misinformation requires a nuanced understanding of human behavior and information consumption habits.
Agreed. This is a valuable lesson for anyone working to improve information access and quality in the digital age.
Refreshing to see a tech leader like Gates openly acknowledging past naivety. The proliferation of misinformation is a complex issue that requires nuanced solutions, not just technological fixes.
Refreshing to see a tech leader like Gates openly acknowledging past naivety. The proliferation of misinformation is a complex issue that requires nuanced solutions, not just technological fixes.
Agreed. Addressing misinformation will require a multidisciplinary effort involving experts in psychology, media literacy, and policy, in addition to technological innovations.
Gates’ candid admission highlights the need for a more holistic approach to information dissemination and consumption. Confirmation bias is a stubborn human trait that tech alone cannot overcome.
Agreed. Addressing misinformation will require a multidisciplinary effort involving experts in psychology, media literacy, and policy, in addition to technological innovations.
Gates’ admission highlights the complex nature of misinformation and the need for a more holistic approach. Technological solutions alone are not enough to overcome the power of confirmation bias.
Absolutely. Addressing this challenge will require expertise from various disciplines, including psychology, media studies, and policy-making.
Gates’ change in perspective is a valuable lesson. Easy access to information does not automatically translate to people seeking out objective truth. Tackling misinformation will be an ongoing challenge.
Gates’ candid reflection on his past assumptions is a sobering reminder that technological advancement alone does not guarantee more informed decision-making. Addressing misinformation requires a multifaceted approach.