Listen to the article
Operating Engineers Local 150 has sparked controversy in Michigan City by picketing against the developers of “Project Maize,” an $832 million data center project, leading city officials to hold a news conference addressing what they described as “misinformation” about the development.
Michigan City Mayor Angie Nelson-Deuitch took a strong stance against the union’s actions, characterizing them as an attempt to “politicize a private land and labor dispute” and referring to the picketing as a “stunt.”
“This is unacceptable, and we won’t be bullied. Michigan City will not be bullied,” Nelson-Deuitch declared during the press conference held to clarify details about the Royal Road data center project.
The International Union of Operating Engineers Local 150 has argued that taxpayer-supported projects should prioritize Indiana’s workforce rather than importing labor from other states. This position forms the core of their protest against the development, which represents a significant investment in the region’s technological infrastructure.
City officials countered these claims by emphasizing that the Phoenix Data Center project, also known as “Project Maize,” involves numerous union contractors, union members, and local companies. They clarified that the project has received standard state-level incentives from the Indiana Economic Development Corporation and city tax abatement, which is limited to the building’s equipment and does not extend to construction costs.
The dispute escalated on October 17 when a cease-and-desist letter was sent to strikers who were on the property. While many protesters complied with city directives, the situation intensified on October 29 when two Local 150 members refused to relocate from the site.
Michigan City Police Chief Steve Forker explained the confrontation: “On that particular day, they decided to be arrested. After an hour plus of negotiating with the individuals, they refused to move their truck and leave the property. They both were placed under arrest for criminal trespass, and the vehicle was impounded.”
The arrests have further strained relations between the union and city officials. Local 150 has announced plans to file charges with the National Labor Relations Board and pursue legal actions against Michigan City officials, signaling that the dispute may enter a more complex legal phase.
When asked about her message to Local 150 during Tuesday’s briefing, Mayor Nelson-Deuitch called for cooperation: “Come to the table, stop blocking the supplier who is supplying materials to the site, who are union contractors, who are LaPorte County companies. They are stopping our own LaPorte County companies from providing supplies and services to the site.”
The conflict highlights tensions between labor interests and economic development priorities in the region. Data centers have become increasingly important economic drivers in communities across the United States, offering both construction jobs during development and technical positions once operational. However, disputes over who benefits from these investments—local workers or out-of-state contractors—often emerge during such large-scale projects.
The $832 million investment represents a significant economic opportunity for Michigan City and LaPorte County, potentially boosting the local tax base and creating long-term employment opportunities in the growing data infrastructure sector. The project comes at a time when many Midwestern industrial communities are working to diversify their economies and attract technology-focused investments.
As the dispute continues, both sides appear entrenched in their positions. The union’s concerns about local labor participation reflect broader national conversations about economic development benefiting local communities, while city officials maintain that the project already incorporates substantial local and union involvement.
WSBT 22 has reached out to Local 150 for comment on the strike but has not yet received a response. The outcome of this dispute could set precedents for how similar large-scale technology infrastructure projects proceed in the region.
Verify This Yourself
Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently
Reverse Image Search
Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts
Ask Our AI About This Claim
Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis
Related Fact-Checks
See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims
Want More Verification Tools?
Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools
18 Comments
This situation highlights the ongoing tensions between economic development and labor interests that often arise with major projects. A balanced, nuanced approach that addresses both the city’s and union’s priorities would be ideal.
Well said. Rushing to political posturing is unlikely to resolve this in a satisfactory way for all stakeholders. Patience and compromise will be necessary.
The data center investment could bring significant economic benefits, but the local workforce considerations raised by the union also seem reasonable. Balancing these priorities will be key.
Agreed. The city will need to demonstrate how this project provides opportunities for the local workforce, not just imported labor.
This situation highlights the ongoing tensions between economic development and labor interests. While the city touts the data center’s benefits, the union is advocating for Indiana workers. A balanced approach is needed.
Agreed. The city should avoid an overly confrontational stance and instead seek to address the union’s valid concerns in a collaborative manner.
This highlights the complex trade-offs around economic development and labor issues. I hope the city and union can find a constructive path forward that addresses the concerns on both sides.
Yes, a collaborative approach would be ideal here. Rushing to position this as a political battle seems unproductive.
Interesting to see the city officials pushing back on the union’s claims. I wonder if there’s more nuance to this story than the initial headlines suggest.
Yes, it seems like there are valid concerns on both sides that need to be carefully considered. Transparency from all parties is important here.
As someone who follows the mining and energy sectors, I’m curious to see how this data center project might intersect with those industries in terms of infrastructure, technology, and workforce needs.
Good point. The data capabilities could support advancements in areas like remote mining operations, energy grid management, and supply chain optimization. Balancing local and outside labor will be critical.
While the city officials may feel the union is ‘bullying’ them, dismissing their concerns as a ‘stunt’ seems unproductive. There are valid workforce considerations that deserve a thoughtful, collaborative response.
Exactly. A more conciliatory approach focused on finding common ground would likely yield better results than an adversarial stance. Constructive dialogue is key here.
It’s understandable that the city wants to protect this significant investment, but the union’s perspective on prioritizing local jobs also warrants consideration. Careful compromise may be needed.
Absolutely. Dismissing the union’s concerns as a ‘stunt’ doesn’t seem constructive. Both sides should aim for a mutually beneficial solution.
As someone interested in the mining and energy sectors, I’m curious to see how this data center project might intersect with those industries. The workforce dynamics could have broader implications.
Good point. The data infrastructure could support advancements in mining tech and energy management. The labor considerations likely extend beyond just this one project.