Listen to the article
In a heated on-air moment that highlights growing tensions between traditional media and digital content creators, conservative commentator Megyn Kelly sharply criticized MS NOW reporter Alex Tabet for his comments about influencers covering the Nancy Guthrie disappearance case.
During Monday’s episode of “The Megyn Kelly Show,” Kelly unleashed a scathing critique of Tabet after playing a clip where he expressed concerns about misinformation being spread by influencers reporting on the ground in Arizona. Tabet had specifically mentioned hearing influencers “saying things that are not based in fact.”
“Oh my god. Of all the networks to be lecturing us on disinformation,” Kelly responded. She defended the role of independent content creators in the high-profile case, arguing they have been instrumental in maintaining public interest and scrutiny. “The nerve of this asshole to try to chide the influencers and the podcasters, who are out there trying to cover this case, into doing it more like [MS NOW] or not doing it at all.”
The dispute underscores a broader media landscape transformation where traditional journalism increasingly competes with independent content creators for audience attention, particularly in coverage of high-profile cases. Kelly praised these influencers as “invaluable,” noting they are “following around law enforcement” and providing important on-the-ground coverage.
The case in question involves Nancy Guthrie, mother of “Today” show anchor Savannah Guthrie, who disappeared on January 31 near her Tucson-area home. She was reported missing around noon local time the following day. The investigation has attracted significant media attention, with both traditional outlets and digital content creators descending on Tucson to cover developments.
Earlier Monday, Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos issued a statement defending the Guthrie family against conspiracy theories suggesting family involvement in the suspected kidnapping. “To be clear… the Guthrie family — to include all siblings and spouses — has been cleared as possible suspects in this case,” Nanos stated, describing the family as “victims plain and simple.”
Authorities have made progress in the investigation, releasing surveillance footage showing a masked, gloved suspect outside Nancy Guthrie’s home early on the morning of her disappearance. Law enforcement officials have reportedly located gloves that appear to match those seen in the doorbell surveillance video and have submitted them for DNA testing.
Despite these developments and the sheriff’s plea for media professionalism, no arrests have been made in the 16 days since Guthrie’s disappearance. The case continues to attract intense scrutiny from various media outlets and independent content creators.
Kelly’s criticism of Tabet reflects her broader defense of alternative media sources in major news stories. She emphasized that she personally evaluates information from various influencers, taking what she considers “valuable” while dismissing the rest. “They’ve been invaluable to us,” she insisted, suggesting that traditional media outlets like MS NOW should be more open to the reporting done by independent content creators.
The clash between Kelly and Tabet exemplifies the evolving dynamics of news coverage in the digital age, where boundaries between professional journalism and independent content creation continue to blur. As the Guthrie case remains unresolved, the debate over who should be reporting and how they should do it appears likely to continue alongside the investigation itself.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
This tension is interesting. Both traditional and independent media have strengths and weaknesses. The key is finding a balance where all voices are heard, but quality and accuracy are prioritized.
Well said. Healthy competition between media types can be good, as long as it leads to higher standards and better journalism overall.
It’s interesting to see this tension play out. Both traditional and independent media have important roles to play, but the focus should be on delivering accurate, well-researched information to the public.
Megyn Kelly makes a fair point about the role of independent creators in high-profile cases like this. They can shine a light on issues that traditional outlets miss. But credibility is key for all media.
This clash highlights the evolving media landscape. While independent voices can play a valuable role, traditional outlets still have resources and experience that shouldn’t be dismissed. Finding the right balance is crucial.
This debate between traditional media and independent creators highlights the changing landscape of news and information. It’s good to have multiple perspectives, but quality and accuracy should be the priority, no matter the source.
I agree. Influencers can play an important role, but they also need to be accountable for the information they share. Fact-checking is crucial.
It’s concerning to hear allegations of misinformation from either side. In these divisive times, the public needs reliable, fact-based reporting they can trust, no matter the source.
Absolutely. Responsible reporting and transparency should be the goal, whether you’re a major network or an independent creator.
This dispute underscores the need for high journalistic standards across all media, whether legacy or new. Fact-checking, transparency, and accountability should be the foundation, no matter the platform.