Listen to the article
In the aftermath of the deadly Bondi Beach attacks that left at least 15 people dead and several others injured, a wave of misinformation has flooded social media platforms, creating confusion about key details of the tragedy.
The shooting, which targeted a Hanukkah gathering on Sunday, involved a father-son duo of attackers. One shooter was killed during a confrontation with police, while the other was apprehended. Despite authorities’ efforts to provide accurate updates, false narratives continue to circulate online.
Among the most prevalent misinformation concerns the identity of the heroic bystander who disarmed one of the attackers. The actual hero, Ahmed Al Ahmed, a 43-year-old Muslim father of two who emigrated from Syria to Australia in 2006, was shot in the hand and arm while confronting and disarming Sajid Akram.
However, social media platforms and AI tools quickly spread a fabricated story about a fictional “Edward Crabtree,” described as a “47-year-old IT professional” and a “born and bred Sydneysider.” This false narrative originated on a website called “The Daily,” which was created in Iceland the same day as the attack. The fictional account included elaborate details about “Crabtree’s” background and fabricated quotes from police.
Elon Musk’s AI tool Grok was identified as a significant amplifier of this misinformation. The system falsely claimed that video footage of Ahmed tackling the shooter was “an old viral video of a man climbing a palm tree” and that photos of Ahmed’s injuries were actually “Israeli hostage footage recorded by Hamas.”
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese visited Ahmed in the hospital, where he awaits further surgery, and publicly recognized his bravery. “He was trying to get a cup of coffee and found himself at a moment where people were being shot in front of him,” Albanese stated. “He decided to take action, and his bravery is an inspiration for all Australians… Ahmed Al Ahmed represents the best of our country. Ahmed, you are an Australian hero.”
Another widespread conspiracy theory falsely claimed that the name of one of the gunmen, Naveed Akram, was searched in Israel before the attack occurred, based on misinterpreted Google Trends data. Google has clarified that for rarely searched terms, even one or two queries can appear as significant spikes on their graphs, and such patterns should not be interpreted as evidence of prior knowledge or planning.
Arsen Ostrovsky, a human rights lawyer and pro-Israeli activist injured in the attack, became the target of AI-generated deepfakes circulating on Reddit, WhatsApp, and X. These fabricated images purported to show him having makeup and fake blood applied at the scene, supporting a false narrative that the attack was a “false flag” operation orchestrated by Israel.
“I saw these images as I was being prepped to go into surgery,” Ostrovsky wrote on X, “And [I] will not dignify this sick campaign of lies and hate with a response.”
Female police officers at the scene also faced online harassment after a heavily cropped photo went viral with claims they “completely froze” while “gunmen reportedly fired for up to 20 minutes without interruption.” In reality, these officers were helping civilians evacuate after both attackers had been neutralized.
Meanwhile, an innocent Pakistani man who shares the same name as one of the shooters told The Guardian his life has become “a nightmare” after being falsely identified as an attacker.
Cybersecurity expert Casey Ellis, who has consulted for the White House and Australian intelligence agencies, explained why such misinformation spreads rapidly: “This event is unbelievably tragic, deeply emotionally charged, and polarizing in about a million different directions. When you combine these with the ‘fog of war’ information environment that exists so soon after something like this, the desire and need for answers, and just how easy it is to create misinformation, you end up with a multitude of opportunities to create misinformation.”
Ellis advises the public to exercise caution when sharing unverified information. “Think twice before you repost things that you see or read, especially if they contain specific factual information or messages strongly biased towards triggering an emotional response,” he said. “The most reliable information tends to come out as the event is unfolding. From there, it is often swamped by misinformation – this is the danger zone we find ourselves in right now.”
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
While it’s disturbing to see how quickly misinformation can take hold, I’m glad the real hero, Ahmed Al Ahmed, is being recognized for his courageous actions. Focusing on the true accounts is important.
The proliferation of misinformation is a serious issue that undermines public understanding and erodes trust. I hope the authorities are able to effectively combat these false narratives and provide the full, verified facts to the community.
Agreed. Fact-based reporting and transparency from officials are essential to counter the spread of misinformation, especially around sensitive events like this. The public deserves accurate, reliable information.
Tragic to see how misinformation can spread so quickly online, especially around sensitive events like this attack. It’s important authorities work to provide accurate, verified information to the public.
As someone who follows news and events closely, I’m disappointed to see how quickly inaccurate details can spread, especially around such a tragic incident. We need to be vigilant and seek out credible sources.
This is a sobering reminder of the challenges we face in the digital age, where misinformation can travel so rapidly. Robust fact-checking and transparency from authorities are crucial to counter these harmful falsehoods.
The fabricated story about a fictional ‘Edward Crabtree’ hero is really concerning. Social media and AI tools need to be more diligent about verifying details before amplifying narratives, to avoid fueling the spread of misinformation.
Absolutely. Identifying and combating false narratives should be a top priority, to maintain public trust and ensure the facts are clearly communicated.
It’s encouraging to hear that the real hero, Ahmed Al Ahmed, has been recognized for his bravery in confronting the attacker. His actions likely saved lives, and his story should be the focus, not made-up accounts.