Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

The global healthcare publishing landscape is evolving rapidly as major scientific publishers adapt to changing digital environments and intellectual property challenges. Elsevier Ltd., one of the world’s foremost medical and scientific publishers, has recently updated its terms of service and copyright policies to address emerging technologies in data mining and artificial intelligence.

In a notable shift from previous policies, Elsevier has emphasized its comprehensive intellectual property rights covering not only traditional publishing formats but also newer applications of its content. According to the updated terms, “All content on this site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier Ltd., its licensors, and contributors,” with specific mention that “All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.”

This policy update comes amid growing industry concerns about the unauthorized use of scientific and medical literature in training large language models and AI systems. Publishers worldwide have been strengthening their copyright positions as AI developers increasingly rely on published scientific literature to improve their models’ knowledge and capabilities in specialized domains.

For researchers and healthcare professionals who regularly access Elsevier’s platforms, including The Lancet family of journals, these changes establish clearer boundaries around how content may be used beyond traditional reading and citation. The publisher has explicitly stated that even for open access content, which typically allows broader usage rights, “the relevant licensing terms apply,” suggesting a calibrated approach that distinguishes between different types of content.

The digital user experience has also been refined, with Elsevier implementing enhanced cookie management options that allow site visitors greater control over data collection practices. The cookie policy notification now prominently features a dedicated settings button, reflecting growing attention to data privacy regulations globally.

These developments occur against a backdrop of significant tension between scientific publishers and technology companies. Several major publishers, including Elsevier’s parent company RELX, have previously raised concerns about AI companies using copyrighted materials without proper licensing or attribution.

Industry analysts note that publishers are navigating complex territory as they balance protecting intellectual property with the scientific community’s need for information access. Dr. Michael Stevens, a digital publishing expert at Columbia University, explains: “Scientific publishers face a genuine dilemma. They need to protect their business models while not impeding legitimate research and advancement. These updated terms signal a more protective stance in response to AI’s voracious appetite for training data.”

The policy changes also reflect broader trends in academic and scientific publishing, where publishers are seeking to maintain control over high-value content while adapting to digital transformation. Elsevier, which publishes approximately 18% of the world’s scientific journal articles, holds significant influence in how scientific information is distributed and monetized.

Healthcare professionals accessing these platforms should be aware that the terms specifically note the content is “intended for science and health care professionals,” suggesting tailored content that may differ from information presented to general audiences.

The implications extend beyond just reader access, potentially affecting how researchers and developers can use published medical literature for developing clinical decision support tools, medical education platforms, and other healthcare technologies that rely on processing large volumes of scientific text.

As medical publishing continues its digital evolution, these policy refinements highlight the ongoing tension between open scientific discourse and commercial publishing models in an era where information can be computationally processed and repurposed in unprecedented ways.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

11 Comments

  1. Jennifer Johnson on

    This news about Elsevier’s updated copyright policies highlights the complex interplay between emerging technologies and traditional publishing models. I’m curious to see how other major scientific publishers respond to these challenges.

  2. As AI and data-driven research become more prevalent, it makes sense for publishers to reassess their policies. Protecting their content and intellectual property is a legitimate concern, though the balance with scientific openness will be tricky.

    • You raise a good point. Maintaining a healthy ecosystem for scientific publishing in the age of AI will require nuanced policies that foster progress while respecting rights and norms.

  3. The growth of AI and data mining presents both opportunities and risks for the scientific publishing industry. It’s reassuring to see publishers taking steps to protect their intellectual property, though the long-term implications remain to be seen.

    • Elizabeth Taylor on

      Agreed. Finding the right balance between enabling innovation and safeguarding rights will be critical as these technologies continue to evolve.

  4. Patricia A. Brown on

    Interesting to see the publishing industry adapting to the rise of AI and data mining. Copyright protections will be crucial as these technologies advance further. Curious to see how the balance between open science and commercial interests plays out.

    • Absolutely, the legal and ethical challenges around AI and scientific literature will only intensify. Careful policy development will be essential to support innovation while respecting intellectual property.

  5. Isabella F. Williams on

    Updating copyright policies to cover new applications like AI training is a prudent move by Elsevier. The rapid pace of technological change is creating complex challenges for traditional publishers that they’ll need to navigate carefully.

  6. It’s not surprising to see major publishers like Elsevier tightening their copyright policies in response to the rise of AI and data mining. Protecting their content and intellectual property is a valid concern, though the implications for open science will be worth watching.

  7. William M. Martinez on

    This news underscores the importance of proactive policy development in the face of disruptive technologies. The publishing industry is right to be vigilant about protecting its intellectual property as AI capabilities expand.

    • Absolutely. Striking the right balance between supporting scientific progress and safeguarding copyrights will be an ongoing challenge for publishers and policymakers alike.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.