Listen to the article
Egypt moved forward Wednesday with plans to strengthen penalties against misinformation, announcing that the Cabinet will amend the country’s Penal Code to impose harsher financial punishments for spreading rumors and fake news.
The decision came during a Cabinet meeting chaired by Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly at the New Administrative Capital, where officials concluded that current fines are insufficient to deter what they describe as information crimes that threaten “societal security and the national economy.”
The Ministry of Justice has been tasked with drafting amendments specifically targeting Article 380 of the Penal Code. While the Cabinet stated that “the legislative framework governing the confrontation of rumors and fake news is sufficient at present to achieve effective deterrence,” they emphasized that financial penalties need strengthening to properly reflect the severity of these offenses.
This move comes amid growing government concerns about the spread of misinformation in Egypt, particularly on social media platforms where unverified claims can rapidly circulate. Critics of the government have expressed concerns that such laws could potentially limit freedom of expression, though officials maintain the measures target only deliberately false information.
In conjunction with the amended penalties, the Cabinet announced plans to accelerate the development of a comprehensive Data Circulation Law. This legislation, currently being drafted by the Ministries of Justice and Communications, aims to regulate the flow of official information and data in accordance with Article 68 of the Egyptian Constitution.
The proposed law seeks to establish a balance between transparency and data protection by creating mechanisms for citizens to access verified information while safeguarding sensitive data. Government officials argue this will help combat misinformation by providing reliable, official alternatives to unofficial sources.
“This legislation is critical for creating a transparent information ecosystem while simultaneously protecting national interests,” said a Ministry of Communications spokesperson who requested anonymity as they weren’t authorized to speak publicly on the matter. “Citizens deserve access to accurate information, but this must be balanced with proper safeguards.”
To strengthen institutional responses to misinformation, the Cabinet has directed all government ministries to establish specialized “early warning units” designed to quickly identify and counter emerging rumors. These units will coordinate with the Cabinet’s Media Centre to ensure rapid, fact-based responses to misinformation with “accurate data, documented information, and conclusive evidence.”
The Ministry of Communications and Information Technology will also implement a specialized training program for state employees to enhance their technical skills in tracking rumors and verifying information authenticity. This represents a significant investment in building government capacity to monitor and respond to misinformation in real-time.
While announcing these measures, the government emphasized its continued commitment to constitutional protections for media freedom. “Freedom of the media and the press is guaranteed by the constitution and regulating laws,” the Cabinet statement read. “However, we must all cooperate… to confront misleading fake news that harms society in general.”
Egypt’s move mirrors similar efforts by governments worldwide grappling with the challenges of digital misinformation. Countries across the Middle East and beyond have implemented various regulatory frameworks to address false information, particularly during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic when health-related misinformation proliferated globally.
Media rights organizations have previously expressed concerns about the potential for such laws to be applied broadly, potentially impacting legitimate journalism. However, Egyptian officials maintain that the amendments are narrowly targeted at deliberate disinformation rather than good-faith reporting.
The timeline for implementing these changes remains unclear, though the Cabinet’s emphasis on accelerating the process suggests the amendments could be introduced in the coming months.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
7 Comments
Strengthening penalties for misinformation is understandable, but the government must ensure these laws are not abused to suppress dissent or criticism. Careful implementation and oversight will be crucial to maintain public trust and a healthy information ecosystem.
This is a complex issue without easy solutions. On one hand, the spread of misinformation can be damaging, but overly restrictive laws risk curtailing legitimate free speech. I hope the Egyptian government can find an approach that effectively addresses the problem while upholding democratic principles.
Stronger penalties for misinformation could help deter the spread of harmful rumors and falsehoods, but the government will need to be careful not to overstep and infringe on legitimate journalistic activities. Balancing public interest and national security concerns is a delicate task.
You raise a fair point. The government will need to strike the right balance and ensure these laws are not abused to stifle critical reporting or dissenting views.
As someone who follows mining and commodities news, I’m curious to see how this new data law might impact reporting on those sectors. Ensuring accuracy and transparency is important, but the details around implementation will be key to avoid unintended consequences.
That’s a good observation. The mining and energy sectors are important to Egypt’s economy, so the government will need to be mindful of how these laws are applied in that context.
This is an interesting move by the Egyptian government to combat the spread of misinformation. While freedom of expression is important, addressing the real threat of fake news is also crucial for societal security and the economy. It will be important to ensure these laws are applied fairly and don’t unduly restrict legitimate discourse.