Listen to the article
In an escalating online dispute that has caught the medical community’s attention, ZOHO co-founder and Chief Scientist Sridhar Vembu has sparked controversy by publicly questioning childhood vaccination practices. The tech executive’s comments on social media platform X (formerly Twitter) have drawn sharp criticism from healthcare professionals concerned about public health implications.
Vembu claimed in his post that “there is increasing evidence that we are giving way too many vaccines to very young children,” further asserting that this practice is “spreading in India” and linked to what he described as “a rapid increase in autism in India.” His statements referenced what medical professionals have characterized as questionable research that hasn’t undergone proper peer review.
The controversy intensified as numerous medical experts responded to Vembu’s claims. When one neonatal specialist criticized his stance as “utterly irresponsible,” Vembu challenged the doctor’s expertise, arguing that specialists cannot “scientifically know all the long-term effects of every shot we give young babies.” He further criticized what he called “professional arrogance” and “hyper-specialization” in modern medicine.
Dr. Cyric Abby Phillips, known on social media as “The Liver Doctor,” was among the prominent voices countering Vembu’s assertions. In a detailed response, Dr. Phillips urged the public not to stop vaccinating their children, warning of the potential return of diseases like polio and pointing to recent measles outbreaks in the United States linked to vaccine hesitancy.
“The conclusions of this study are not credible either,” Dr. Phillips wrote, referring to the research Vembu had cited. He described the authors as “a bunch of antivaxxers, funded by an antivaxx organization, who published the study on their own antivaxx website,” noting it was “not peer reviewed, not scrutinized.”
Dr. Phillips referenced more robust scientific evidence, including a large Danish study that found no association between childhood vaccines and 50 different health conditions, including autism. He described this as “the largest study ever on this” topic, contrasting it with what he called “pathetic links” in the research Vembu promoted.
The exchange grew increasingly heated, with Dr. Phillips using pointed language to criticize the tech executive, even referencing previous controversies involving Vembu’s alternative health statements and questioning the performance of ZOHO’s products like the Arattai Messenger App.
Despite multiple medical professionals urging Vembu to delete his post due to public health concerns, the ZOHO executive remained firm. “I will not delete my post. I stand by what I said,” Vembu responded, going further to question the credibility of established health institutions. “The term ‘Dodgy western source’ should be applied to FDA and CDC recommendations, by the way. Those institutions do not deserve blind faith,” he added.
This isn’t the first time Vembu has found himself at odds with the medical establishment. Previous controversies have seen him clash with healthcare professionals over various health claims, including discussions about alternative treatments.
The dispute highlights growing tensions between technology leaders who command large social media followings and medical professionals concerned about the spread of health misinformation. Public health experts have repeatedly warned that vaccine hesitancy, fueled in part by online misinformation, represents one of the most significant threats to global health progress made over recent decades.
As the debate continues, medical organizations emphasize that the scientific consensus strongly supports the safety and efficacy of childhood vaccinations, which have been instrumental in preventing millions of deaths globally from formerly common diseases.
Verify This Yourself
Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently
Reverse Image Search
Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts
Ask Our AI About This Claim
Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis
Related Fact-Checks
See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims
Want More Verification Tools?
Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools
14 Comments
Vaccine safety is an important topic that warrants serious, evidence-based discussion. While questioning established practices is valuable, making claims that contradict scientific consensus could have significant public health implications. I hope this debate leads to a constructive exchange that addresses valid concerns while upholding evidence-based policymaking.
I share the concern about the need for nuanced, fact-based dialogue on this issue. Inflammatory rhetoric and unsubstantiated claims, regardless of the source, are unlikely to advance public understanding or improve health outcomes. A collaborative, solution-oriented approach would be more constructive.
This is a complex and sensitive issue that deserves careful consideration. While I appreciate the tech executive’s willingness to challenge accepted norms, his claims seem to lack robust scientific backing. I hope this debate leads to a constructive exchange that prioritizes public health and evidence-based policymaking.
I agree that open dialogue is important, but making unsubstantiated claims about links between vaccines and autism could undermine public trust in essential medical interventions. A thoughtful, evidence-based discussion would be more productive.
Discussions around vaccine policy should be informed by rigorous scientific research, not anecdotal observations. I hope the medical community can find a constructive way to address any valid concerns while upholding evidence-based practices.
I agree, this is a complex issue that deserves nuanced discussion. Both sides should approach it with humility and a commitment to public health, rather than engaging in personal attacks.
This debate highlights the need for open, evidence-based dialogue on public health issues. While questioning the status quo is valuable, unsubstantiated claims can undermine trust in essential medical interventions.
I appreciate the tech executive’s willingness to challenge conventional wisdom, but his statements appear to contradict the scientific consensus. A constructive exchange of ideas, grounded in rigorous research, would be more productive.
Vaccine safety is a legitimate concern, but making unsupported claims about links to autism could have serious public health consequences. I hope this debate leads to a thoughtful, evidence-based discussion that addresses valid questions while upholding established medical practices.
I agree that questioning the status quo is important, but it needs to be done responsibly and with due consideration for the potential impact on public health. A nuanced, fact-based dialogue would be more constructive than inflammatory rhetoric.
Vaccine safety is an important issue, but making unsubstantiated claims about links to autism could undermine public confidence in essential childhood immunizations. I hope this debate leads to a thoughtful, evidence-based dialogue.
Questioning established medical practices is reasonable, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I encourage all sides to engage in good faith and avoid inflammatory rhetoric, for the sake of public health.
This is a complex and controversial topic. I appreciate the tech executive raising questions, but his claims seem to contradict established medical consensus. More nuanced discussion is needed to address public health concerns responsibly.
I agree, the comments come across as oversimplified and not grounded in scientific evidence. Doctors should engage constructively to address valid concerns while upholding established medical practices.