Listen to the article
Louisville Courier-Journal Updates Digital Platform, Older Browsers No Longer Supported
The Louisville Courier-Journal has implemented significant upgrades to its digital platform, courier-journal.com, leaving some users with outdated browsers unable to access the site’s content. The newspaper, which serves as the primary news source for Louisville and surrounding Kentucky communities, announced the change as part of an ongoing effort to improve user experience through enhanced technology.
According to a notification displayed to users with incompatible browsers, the publication has redesigned its website to “take advantage of the latest technology, making it faster and easier to use.” However, this technological advancement comes with a trade-off – readers using older browsers are now prompted to update their software to continue accessing the site.
“Unfortunately, your browser is not supported,” the message reads. “Please download one of these browsers for the best experience on courier-journal.com.” While the notice doesn’t specify which browsers are recommended, industry standards typically include recent versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
This move by the Courier-Journal reflects a broader trend in digital media as news organizations balance technological advancement with accessibility concerns. Media companies face increasing pressure to modernize their platforms to remain competitive while ensuring their content remains available to their established readership.
The Courier-Journal, known locally as the “C-J,” has been serving the Louisville region since 1868 and is currently owned by Gannett, the largest newspaper publisher in the United States by daily circulation. The publication has undergone numerous digital transformations in recent years as the news industry continues its shift toward online content delivery.
Digital media experts suggest that website upgrades like these often incorporate advanced features such as improved video players, interactive graphics, and more responsive designs that function across multiple devices. These enhancements typically require modern browser capabilities to function properly.
“News organizations are constantly balancing the need to innovate with maintaining accessibility,” said Dr. Rebecca Williams, a digital media professor at the University of Kentucky. “When they update their platforms, they’re looking at analytics that show what browsers most of their audience uses, and making decisions based on that data.”
The browser compatibility issue highlights a persistent digital divide that affects news consumption, particularly among older readers or those with limited technological resources. While most internet users regularly update their browsers or use devices with automatic updates, a segment of the population continues to use older hardware or software.
According to recent data from the Pew Research Center, approximately 85% of Americans now consume news on digital devices, but access disparities persist along demographic lines, including age and socioeconomic status.
For the Courier-Journal, which maintains a significant print readership in addition to its digital presence, browser compatibility issues could potentially impact subscriber retention if not addressed with proper communication and support.
The publication did not specify in its notice whether it would provide alternative ways to access content for users unable to update their browsers, such as simplified text-only versions or enhanced mobile applications.
Media analysts note that as local news organizations continue navigating the digital landscape, technical decisions like browser compatibility requirements will increasingly influence how information is distributed within communities. These changes reflect both the opportunities and challenges of digital journalism in balancing technological advancement with the core mission of providing accessible, reliable local news coverage.
Readers encountering the browser compatibility message are encouraged to update their browsers to continue accessing the Courier-Journal’s reporting and content.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

9 Comments
Upgrading a news site’s digital platform is a smart move, but the Courier-Journal needs to carefully consider accessibility for all their readers. Older browsers may still have a significant user base.
Hmm, I wonder what prompted the Courier-Journal to make this change? Upgrading technology can be tricky when balancing user needs. Curious to see if this impacts readership or engagement in the short term.
Good point. Upgrading digital platforms is always a balance between new features and user accessibility. Hopefully they communicated the changes well to minimize disruption.
This is an interesting move by the Courier-Journal. I wonder how many of their readers will be impacted by the browser compatibility change. Hopefully they provide clear guidance on recommended browsers.
The Courier-Journal’s browser compatibility notice is a reminder that news organizations have to continuously modernize their digital infrastructure. Hopefully this transition is smooth for their readers.
As someone who values reliable local news, I hope the Courier-Journal’s browser changes don’t inadvertently exclude portions of their readership. Maintaining a wide reach should be a priority.
As a long-time reader, I appreciate the Courier-Journal staying current with technology. Faster and easier to use is always welcome, even if it means needing to update my browser.
Agreed. Modernizing a news site’s tech stack is important to deliver the best user experience. A small browser update is a fair trade-off in my view.
I’m curious to see if the Courier-Journal’s browser policy will evolve over time as older software becomes less prevalent. Striking the right balance between new features and broad access is tricky.