Listen to the article
In an era of easily accessible digital editing tools, media manipulation has become a growing concern, particularly as a vehicle for spreading misinformation online. Educational experts are now focusing on equipping students with critical media literacy skills to identify and evaluate manipulated content they encounter daily.
A new comprehensive media literacy curriculum tackles this challenge head-on by teaching students how to recognize five distinct types of manipulated media: lost context, edited media, staged media, computer-generated media, and synthetic media or “deep fakes.”
“The technology to create convincing fakes has outpaced many people’s ability to identify them,” says Dr. Amanda Rogers, a media literacy researcher at the University of Wisconsin. “What’s concerning is how these manipulations can spread rapidly through social platforms before being debunked.”
The curriculum uses real-world examples, including content from the contentious 2022 Pennsylvania Senate race between Democratic candidate John Fetterman and Republican Mehmet Oz, where both candidates were victims of what experts call “cheap fakes” – manipulated media created using simple, accessible editing tools.
One case study examines how TikTok users manipulated footage during the Ukraine conflict, adding sounds of explosions or sirens to unrelated videos to generate views or even solicit donations under false pretenses. The curriculum highlights how misinformation researcher Abbie Richards exposed these tactics by demonstrating how users would pause recorded footage and overlay crisis sounds.
“Even well-intentioned sharing of manipulated media can cause real harm,” the curriculum notes. For people in conflict zones like Ukraine, accurate information about dangerous areas is literally life-saving. False information can misdirect resources, create confusion about genuine threats, and undermine trust in legitimate aid efforts.
The educational program, developed through a partnership between MediaWise, a digital literacy initiative of the Poynter Institute, and PBS NewsHour Student Reporting Labs, provides students with practical verification strategies. These include examining audio quality, analyzing speech patterns and cadence, conducting reverse image searches, and comparing suspicious content with footage from reputable sources.
“What makes this approach effective is that it goes beyond simply identifying fake content to helping students understand why these manipulations exist and who benefits from them,” explains Michael Caulfield, digital literacy expert and author of “Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers.”
The curriculum aligns with various educational standards, including Common Core ELA Standards, the College, Career, and Civic Life Framework, and International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) requirements for digital citizenship.
Designed for grades 6-12, the program emphasizes experiential learning through guided analysis of real examples. Students practice identifying manipulated media and consider the ethical implications and potential harms of creating or sharing such content.
Market research suggests timing couldn’t be better for this educational initiative. A recent Stanford study found that over 82% of middle school students struggled to distinguish between sponsored content and genuine news articles online. As we approach another election cycle, experts warn that the sophistication and volume of manipulated media will likely increase.
“Teaching media literacy isn’t just about protecting students from being deceived,” notes Kristin Shearer, MediaWise program director. “It’s about empowering them to become responsible digital citizens who can evaluate information critically and make informed decisions about what they choose to share.”
The curriculum represents a growing recognition that media literacy is no longer optional but essential in preparing students for participation in digital society. As manipulated media becomes more pervasive and convincing, the ability to identify and evaluate such content has become a fundamental skill for the digital age.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
Manipulated media is a serious concern, especially with the rise of cheap editing tools. This curriculum sounds like a great way to equip students with the skills to identify different types of media manipulation.
Absolutely. Developing critical media literacy is so important in this digital age where misinformation can spread rapidly. Kudos to the experts for creating this comprehensive program.
I’m curious to learn more about the specific examples they use from the 2022 Pennsylvania Senate race. Political manipulation of media is a worrying trend that needs to be addressed.
Yes, that’s a great point. Understanding how ‘cheap fakes’ were used in that high-profile race will provide valuable real-world context for students.
Kudos to the media literacy experts for taking on this important issue. With the speed at which misinformation can spread online, these skills are essential for students to develop.
This curriculum seems like a valuable tool to combat the growing problem of media manipulation. Arming students with the ability to critically evaluate online content is crucial in today’s digital landscape.
This is a much-needed initiative. As digital tools become more advanced, the ability to create convincing fakes outpaces the average person’s ability to spot them. Equipping the next generation with these critical skills is crucial.
I appreciate the focus on real-world examples from the 2022 Pennsylvania Senate race. Using timely, relevant case studies will make the lessons more impactful for students.
Agreed. Grounding the curriculum in current events makes it much more relatable and meaningful for the students.
Interesting to see the focus on five distinct types of manipulated media. I wonder how the curriculum tackles the challenge of synthetic media or ‘deep fakes’ in particular, as those can be especially hard to detect.
That’s a great question. Identifying deep fakes will likely be one of the more complex parts of the curriculum, given how rapidly that technology is evolving.