Listen to the article
Arsenal’s victory over Newcastle marred by controversy as Arteta’s post-match comments spark debate
Arsenal secured all three points with a 2-1 win against Newcastle United at St. James’ Park on Sunday, but the aftermath has been dominated by discussions about refereeing decisions rather than the quality of play.
Manager Mikel Arteta’s post-match comments have once again placed officiating in the spotlight, with the Spaniard suggesting his team overcame unfavorable decisions to claim victory. “We were instructed very clearly this season that unless it is a clear and obvious error, the VAR is not going to intervene,” Arteta stated after the match, referring to an overturned penalty decision. “Thank God we found a way to win the game.”
The controversy began early when Arsenal striker Viktor Gyokeres went down after a collision with Newcastle goalkeeper Nick Pope following a weak back pass from Jacob Murphy. Referee Jarred Gillett initially awarded a penalty before being directed to the pitchside monitor by VAR Darren England, subsequently overturning his decision.
Replays showed Pope made contact with the ball before the collision occurred, though Arteta maintained it should have been a penalty and potentially a card for the Newcastle goalkeeper.
The home side took the lead when Nick Woltemade headed in from Sandro Tonali’s cross. Arsenal defender Gabriel appeared to claim he was impeded before the goal, but officials deemed there was insufficient contact to disallow it.
A pivotal moment came in the 77th minute when Newcastle’s Tino Livramento was stretchered off after a challenge from William Saliba. The Arsenal defender made no attempt to challenge for a header, instead running into Livramento while the full-back was in mid-air, causing him to land awkwardly. Despite the potential severity of the injury, Saliba wasn’t shown even a yellow card.
Shortly after Arsenal’s equalizer, Newcastle had their own penalty claim when Anthony Elanga’s cross clearly struck Gabriel’s outstretched arm. VAR determined no penalty was warranted because the ball had touched the defender’s shin before hitting his arm, though the deflection appeared minimal and didn’t significantly alter the ball’s trajectory.
The controversies have fueled debate about consistency in officiating, with statistics showing Arsenal dominated possession (64% to 36%) and created significantly more chances, registering 20 shots to Newcastle’s 8, with 7 on target compared to Newcastle’s 3.
This incident adds to the ongoing discussion about VAR implementation in the Premier League, with many observers noting the inconsistency in how similar situations are judged from match to match.
For Newcastle, the focus now shifts to their upcoming Champions League fixture against Union SG on Wednesday, followed by a Premier League clash with Nottingham Forest on Sunday. Eddie Howe’s side will be concerned about Livramento’s injury status, with the defender having been a key performer this season.
Arsenal, meanwhile, continue their impressive form but questions remain about whether the persistent focus on officiating from their manager is a deliberate strategy or genuine frustration with decision-making.
The debate highlights the increasing pressure on officials in high-profile matches, with managers’ post-match narratives often shaping media coverage regardless of the overall balance of decisions throughout the 90 minutes.
Verify This Yourself
Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently
Reverse Image Search
Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts
Ask Our AI About This Claim
Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis
Related Fact-Checks
See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims
Want More Verification Tools?
Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools
8 Comments
Arsenal’s victory over Newcastle may have been overshadowed by the refereeing dispute, but it’s an important issue that warrants discussion. Fans deserve clarity on how the rules are being interpreted and applied, regardless of the teams involved.
Interesting to see the scrutiny on Arteta’s media tactics. Seems the refereeing decisions in the Arsenal-Newcastle match have sparked quite the debate. Wonder if the manager is trying to influence the narrative or if there are legitimate issues with the VAR process.
I can understand Arteta’s frustration if the VAR overturned a clear penalty call. Referees should strive for consistency in their decisions.
The media scrutiny on Arteta’s tactics is understandable given the high-profile nature of the match and the controversial refereeing decisions. Fans want to see fair play, and managers have a responsibility to uphold the integrity of the game.
Arteta’s comments suggest he believes his team was unfairly treated, but it’s difficult to assess without seeing the full context. VAR is meant to improve accuracy, but if the process is not transparent, it can undermine the credibility of the game.
Exactly. Clear and consistent application of the rules is crucial for the integrity of the sport.
This highlights the challenge of maintaining transparency and accountability in the sport, especially with the increased use of video technology. Managers will always try to sway public opinion, but the rules and their application need to be clear and fair.
Agreed. The VAR process has to be robust and well-communicated to avoid these kinds of controversies.