Listen to the article
Wyoming Secretary of State Defends Voter Data Release Amid Criticism
Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray has sharply criticized the Wyoming League of Women Voters and Wyoming Democrats for what he describes as “Trump Derangement Syndrome” in an escalating dispute over the release of Wyoming voter information to federal authorities.
In a strongly worded statement released Monday morning, Gray defended his decision to share voter data with the federal government, insisting that he consulted with the Wyoming Attorney General’s Office before taking action.
“The Democrats’ false claims are driven by Trump Derangement Syndrome and left-wing hysteria, not the truth,” Gray stated. “These claims are false, defamatory, and made with malice.”
Gray explained that his office complied with what he characterized as a lawful request from a federal law enforcement agency responsible for enforcing voting rights. According to the Secretary of State, the data sharing was necessary to ensure Wyoming’s voter rolls were compliant with both the Help America Vote Act and the Civil Rights Act.
He emphasized that voter information “has, and continues to remain, confidential under the law” despite claims to the contrary from his critics.
The dispute highlights growing tensions over voter data privacy in Wyoming, a traditionally conservative state where government overreach concerns resonate strongly with many residents. It also reflects broader national debates about the balance between federal oversight of elections and state autonomy.
The controversy began earlier this year when the League of Women Voters issued a January statement expressing alarm over what they termed “an unprecedented effort by our federal government to collect sensitive voter data from the Wyoming state government.”
According to the League, the shared information potentially included highly sensitive personal data such as Social Security numbers, portions of Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, birth dates, telephone numbers, tribal identification card numbers, and email addresses.
“The safest way to protect sensitive data is to limit access to it, ensuring only those who absolutely need it can access it,” the League stated. “States have private, individual voter rolls for a reason. There was no reason to hand over Wyoming voters’ private information to the federal government.”
The confrontation occurs against the backdrop of increased scrutiny of election systems nationwide following the contested 2020 presidential election. Wyoming, though firmly Republican in presidential politics, has not been immune to debates over election security and voter data management.
Election law experts note that states typically maintain tight control over voter registration information, with specific laws governing what data can be shared and with whom. Federal requests for such information have historically been limited and narrowly tailored.
Wyoming’s voter privacy laws are designed to protect citizens’ personal information while maintaining transparent electoral processes. The dispute raises questions about the scope of federal authority to request state-held voter information and the circumstances under which state officials should comply.
Gray, who was elected as Wyoming Secretary of State in 2022, has positioned himself as a defender of election integrity. As the state’s chief election official, he has emphasized his commitment to following legal requirements while protecting Wyoming voters.
The Wyoming Democratic Party has not yet issued a formal response to Gray’s latest accusations, but the exchange signals continuing friction between the Republican-dominated state government and Democratic-affiliated organizations on election administration issues.
The controversy is likely to continue as both sides stand firmly by their positions regarding the proper handling of voter information and the balance between federal oversight and state control of election procedures.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
This appears to be a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. I hope Wyoming can find a balanced approach that upholds voting rights while also protecting voter privacy. Open dialogue between all stakeholders will be key.
Accusations of ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ don’t seem helpful in resolving this dispute constructively. Focusing on the facts and the law will be crucial for reaching a reasonable compromise.
This dispute highlights the ongoing challenges in balancing voting rights, data privacy, and government transparency. I hope Wyoming can find a solution that upholds democratic principles while also protecting individual liberties.
The Secretary of State’s claim that the data sharing was lawful and necessary raises important questions. What were the specific details of the federal request, and how will the data be used to ensure voting rights? Transparency is vital here.
The dispute over voter data sharing in Wyoming highlights the ongoing tensions around voting rights and privacy. I hope all sides can come together to find a solution that protects both democratic integrity and individual liberties.
I’m curious to learn more about the federal agency involved and their role in enforcing voting rights. Their involvement seems central to understanding the legality and necessity of this data sharing request.
Accusations of ‘left-wing hysteria’ don’t seem productive. This is a complex issue that requires nuanced discussion, not partisan rhetoric, to find the right balance.
While I understand the Secretary of State’s position, the concerns raised by the Wyoming League of Women Voters and Democrats also deserve serious consideration. Ensuring fair and secure elections is crucial, but so is respecting voter privacy.
I agree that open dialogue and a focus on facts rather than partisan accusations will be key to resolving this dispute. Wyoming voters deserve a transparent process that addresses all legitimate concerns.
Interesting to see this dispute over voter data sharing in Wyoming. I can understand both sides having concerns about privacy and transparency. Curious to see how this plays out and what the federal government’s role will be.
The Secretary of State seems firm in his stance that the data sharing was lawful and necessary. It’ll be important to get clear information on the specifics of the request and how the data will be used.