Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Two members of the U.S. Air Force’s nuclear security forces have pleaded guilty to making false statements following a shooting incident that temporarily halted the use of Sig Sauer M18 pistols across multiple military branches.

The incident, which occurred in May 2023 at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota, involved Airmen 1st Class Christopher Scheive and Stetson Sannes, both assigned to the 91st Security Forces Group. This unit is responsible for protecting nuclear missile facilities that house intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear warheads.

According to court records, both airmen admitted to providing false information about the circumstances surrounding the shooting. Scheive pleaded guilty to making a false official statement, while Sannes pleaded guilty to charges of disobeying a superior commissioned officer and making a false official statement.

The shooting prompted an immediate suspension of the Sig Sauer M18 pistol across Air Force Global Strike Command, which oversees the nation’s nuclear missile and bomber forces. The temporary ban was later expanded to include several other military branches, affecting thousands of service members who rely on the sidearm for daily operations.

Military officials initially suspected a potential mechanical failure with the M18 pistol, a concern that reverberated throughout the defense community. The M18 is part of the Modular Handgun System that was adopted in 2017 to replace the aging Beretta M9, which had been in service since the 1980s. The Defense Department awarded Sig Sauer a contract worth up to $580 million for the weapons, making any potential defect a significant issue for military readiness.

After extensive investigation, however, the military determined that the incident was not caused by a weapon malfunction but rather by improper handling. This finding led to the reinstatement of the M18 pistol for active duty use across all affected service branches.

The incident highlights the stringent safety protocols surrounding America’s nuclear arsenal and the serious consequences for personnel who fail to adhere to established procedures. Nuclear security forces undergo rigorous training and are held to exceptionally high standards due to the catastrophic potential of the weapons systems they protect.

“The integrity of our nuclear security operations depends on absolute adherence to protocols and complete honesty in reporting,” said a defense analyst familiar with nuclear security procedures. “False statements in this environment aren’t just disciplinary issues—they potentially impact national security.”

The 91st Security Forces Group at Minot Air Force Base is part of a broader network of units tasked with safeguarding America’s nuclear triad—the three-pronged approach to nuclear deterrence consisting of land-based missiles, submarine-launched missiles, and strategic bombers. The base houses approximately 150 Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles across a 8,500-square-mile area.

The Sig Sauer M18 is the compact variant of the M17 pistol and features a 3.9-inch barrel. The pistol was chosen for military service due to its modularity, reliability, and improved accuracy over previous service weapons. The modular design allows for different grip sizes and configurations to accommodate various hand sizes and mission requirements.

Military justice proceedings for violations like those committed by Scheive and Sannes typically result in a range of potential consequences, including reduction in rank, forfeiture of pay, restrictions, extra duties, and in some cases, discharge from military service. The specific sentences for the two airmen have not been publicly disclosed.

This case underscores the critical importance of weapon safety in military environments, particularly in units responsible for nuclear security operations. It also demonstrates how human factors, rather than equipment failures, often contribute to safety incidents in high-stakes military environments.

The Air Force has since implemented additional training requirements for personnel handling the M18 pistol, reinforcing proper safety procedures and emphasizing the importance of accurate reporting in all circumstances related to weapons handling and discharge.

Verify This Yourself

Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently

Reverse Image Search

Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts

Ask Our AI About This Claim

Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis

👋 Hi! I can help you understand this fact-check better. Ask me anything about this claim, related context, or how to verify similar content.

Related Fact-Checks

See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims

Loading fact-checks...

Want More Verification Tools?

Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools

15 Comments

  1. Jennifer Davis on

    The suspension of the M18 pistol across multiple military branches is an understandable reaction to this incident. Maintaining strict protocols around the handling of weapons, especially those related to nuclear capabilities, is of the utmost importance.

    • I agree. The temporary ban on the M18 pistol is a prudent measure to ensure the safety and reliability of the nuclear deterrent forces. Proper procedures must be followed at all times.

  2. Concerning to hear about the false statements made by these Air Force personnel. Transparency and accountability are critical when it comes to the security of our nuclear arsenal. Hopefully, this incident will lead to improved training and oversight to prevent future lapses.

    • You’re right, this situation is very troubling. Nuclear security must be taken extremely seriously, and any breach of protocol or false reporting should be met with swift consequences.

  3. Jennifer Thomas on

    While it’s troubling to hear about false statements made by these airmen, I’m encouraged to see the military taking this issue seriously and suspending the use of the M18 pistol across multiple branches. Rigorous training and oversight are critical to ensure the safety and reliability of our nuclear deterrent.

  4. Elizabeth Martin on

    This incident is certainly concerning, but I’m glad to see the military taking swift action to investigate and hold the responsible parties accountable. Maintaining the highest standards of integrity and security around our nuclear forces is paramount.

    • I agree. Transparency and accountability are key when it comes to such sensitive matters of national security. This should serve as a wake-up call to ensure all protocols are strictly followed.

  5. The suspension of the M18 pistol across multiple branches is a prudent step to ensure the safety and reliability of our nuclear deterrent. Proper protocols and truthful reporting are essential for maintaining public trust in this critical aspect of national security.

  6. This is a stark reminder of the immense responsibility borne by our nuclear security forces. Any breach of protocol or falsification of information is simply unacceptable. I hope the guilty pleas lead to meaningful reforms to strengthen accountability and restore public confidence.

    • Well said. Maintaining the integrity of our nuclear forces is of the utmost importance, and this incident underscores the need for continued vigilance and improvement in training and oversight.

  7. Elizabeth Jones on

    This is a concerning development, but I’m glad to see the military taking swift action to address the issue. Maintaining the highest standards of integrity and security around our nuclear forces is critical. I hope the guilty pleas and subsequent reforms will help prevent similar incidents in the future.

    • William Miller on

      I agree. Transparency and accountability are key when it comes to such sensitive matters of national security. This incident should serve as a wake-up call to ensure all protocols are strictly followed across the board.

  8. The suspension of the M18 pistol across multiple military branches is a prudent measure in response to this incident. Strict adherence to protocols and truthful reporting are essential for maintaining the security and reliability of our nuclear deterrent. Hopefully, this will lead to further enhancements in training and accountability.

  9. This is a sobering reminder of the immense responsibility borne by our nuclear security forces. While mistakes can happen, falsifying information is a serious breach of trust that cannot be tolerated. I hope the guilty pleas lead to meaningful reforms to strengthen accountability.

    • Noah Rodriguez on

      Well said. The guilty pleas indicate that the system is working to hold these individuals accountable. Maintaining the integrity of our nuclear forces is crucial, and this incident should serve as a wake-up call for improved training and oversight.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2025 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved. Designed By Sawah Solutions.