Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Conservative Leader Pledges Climate Change Act Repeal Amid Economic Claims

Kemi Badenoch, Leader of the Opposition, announced this week that a future Conservative government would repeal the Climate Change Act of 2008 if the party wins a majority at the next General Election. The announcement, made in an interview with The Spectator magazine, follows her February statement that under her leadership, the party would abandon the UK’s statutory “net zero” emissions target.

The decision marks a significant shift in Conservative climate policy and contradicts positions Badenoch herself held while serving as a minister in Boris Johnson’s government. Her announcement included several contested claims about the economic impact of climate policies and Britain’s international climate position.

“The Act mandates targets to hit net zero by 2050, which leads to higher costs,” Badenoch stated. However, this assertion contradicts recent analysis from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which found that the total net cost to the economy of reaching net zero emissions would be £116 billion between 2025 and 2050, averaging £4.46 billion per year.

The OBR analysis also shows that projected savings from reduced fossil fuel costs would increase steadily each year, resulting in net annual savings from 2041 onward, reaching £38 billion by 2050. By 2055, total savings would exceed total costs, even without accounting for benefits from avoided climate impacts.

Badenoch acknowledged climate change is “very obviously happening” but claimed ministers “have to do lots of stupid things just to hit the target, even if they are not cutting worldwide emissions or even if we can’t afford them or they’re impractical.”

This position contrasts with statements she made as Exchequer to the Treasury in 2020-21. Speaking in Parliament in September 2021, Badenoch promoted the government’s “Ten Point Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution,” telling MPs: “The Prime Minister’s 10-point plan demonstrates our commitment to net zero. It sets out £12 billion of new Government investment in green industries.”

Among those points was a pledge for 600,000 heat pump installations per year by 2028 – a target Badenoch now describes as “impractical.”

The UK has reduced its annual greenhouse gas emissions by 54.2% compared to 1990 levels while growing its GDP by 82.8%. Other G7 nations have also made progress, with Germany reducing emissions by 45.4%, France by 28.8%, and Japan by 17.9%.

Lord Deben, former Chair of the UK Climate Change Committee and Conservative member of the House of Lords, strongly disputes Badenoch’s characterization of the Climate Change Act. He notes the legislation “was written by the Conservatives when in opposition” and passed with broad cross-party support.

Badenoch also expressed concern about “Labour’s failure to exploit Britain’s own energy assets such as North Sea oil and gas,” arguing “countries that have cheap energy are growing.” However, critics point out that North Sea resources are sold on international markets without discount to British consumers.

When natural gas prices spiked after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Conservative government spent £56.2 billion protecting consumers against rising energy costs, despite the UK meeting most of its demand through domestic production at the time.

The OBR has warned that in a “below 3°C scenario,” climate change impacts would reduce UK GDP by a growing amount over the next 50 years, reaching an estimated 7.8% below baseline projections by 2073-74, suggesting that abandoning climate policies could ultimately prove more costly than pursuing net zero targets.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

10 Comments

  1. It’s concerning that the minister is making claims that seem to be at odds with the available evidence. We need policymaking based on facts, not political posturing, when it comes to something as critical as climate change.

  2. Patricia S. Taylor on

    This is disappointing to see. The UK has been a global leader on climate action, and rolling back the Climate Change Act would undermine that progress. I hope the public pushes back against these proposals.

    • Agreed, the UK government should be focused on developing practical, cost-effective strategies to reach net zero, not making claims that contradict expert analysis.

  3. Michael Taylor on

    While I understand the desire to reduce costs, repealing the Climate Change Act is the wrong approach. We should be looking for ways to meet emissions targets efficiently, not abandoning them entirely.

  4. Oliver X. Moore on

    This is a concerning development. The Climate Change Act has been essential for the UK’s decarbonization efforts. Repealing it would be a major setback in the fight against climate change.

    • I agree, the economic impact analysis shows net zero can be achieved at a reasonable cost. Rolling back climate policy is short-sighted and ignores the larger societal benefits.

  5. Olivia V. Miller on

    The minister’s claims about higher costs seem misleading given the OBR’s findings. Reaching net zero will require investment, but the long-term economic benefits likely outweigh the upfront costs.

    • Michael G. Thompson on

      Exactly, the shift in Conservative climate policy is worrying. We need leaders committed to science-based policymaking, not politicians making unsupported economic claims.

  6. Oliver A. Martin on

    This is a disappointing development. The Climate Change Act has been an important driver of the UK’s decarbonization efforts. Repealing it would be a major step backwards in the fight against climate change.

    • Mary S. Hernandez on

      I share your concerns. The economic arguments made by the minister appear to be unfounded. We need leaders who will make decisions based on rigorous analysis, not ideology.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.