Listen to the article
U.S. President Donald Trump has reignited controversy by declaring an American takeover of Greenland a national security priority for his second term, making statements that experts say contain numerous inaccuracies about the strategic Arctic territory.
Trump has escalated his rhetoric in recent weeks, suggesting military force as a potential option to take control of Greenland, which remains a self-governing territory of Denmark, a NATO ally. He has repeatedly claimed that if the United States does not acquire the island, it would fall under Chinese or Russian control.
However, regional experts have systematically refuted Trump’s assertions about foreign military presence in Greenland’s waters. The president recently claimed: “If you take a look outside of Greenland right now, there are Russian destroyers, there are Chinese destroyers and, bigger, there are Russian submarines all over the place.”
Andreas Østhagen, research director for Arctic and ocean politics at Norway’s Fridtjof Nansen Institute, dismissed these claims outright. “That statement makes no sense in terms of facts. There are no Russian and Chinese ships all over the place around Greenland. Russia and/or China has no capacity to occupy Greenland or to take control over Greenland,” Østhagen stated.
Greenland’s residents echo this assessment. Lars Vintner, a heating engineer in Nuuk, told the Associated Press that despite frequently sailing and hunting around the island, he has never encountered Russian or Chinese vessels. “The only Chinese I see is when I go to the fast food market,” Vintner remarked.
Lin Mortensgaard, an expert on Arctic international politics at the Danish Institute for International Studies, clarified that while Russian submarines likely operate in the broader Arctic region, there are no surface vessels near Greenland. She added that Chinese research ships operate in the Central Arctic Ocean, with joint Chinese-Russian military exercises typically occurring closer to Alaska, not Greenland.
When questioned about Trump’s claims, Greenland’s business minister Naaja Nathanielsen responded, “Not that we are aware of,” adding, “We don’t detect an actual threat.”
Trump has also disparaged Denmark’s military presence in Greenland, claiming their defense consists of merely “two dog sleds.” This drastically misrepresents Denmark’s military infrastructure on the island.
The Sirius Dog Sled Patrol, an elite Danish naval unit that Trump appears to reference, does exist and plays a crucial role in reconnaissance and sovereignty enforcement in Greenland’s harsh Arctic environment. However, it represents only one component of Denmark’s broader military presence.
Steven Lamy, an international relations professor and Arctic security expert at the University of Southern California, explained the practical reasons for such units: “Remember, transportation of the area is either by sea or by air. There are no highways. You can’t basically get in a car or a Bradley vehicle or tank or anything and go up there. So they have dog sleds.”
Denmark maintains several surface patrol ships, surveillance aircraft, and is currently expanding its military footprint around Greenland through a $2.3 billion investment announced last year. The plan includes three new Arctic naval vessels, additional long-range surveillance drones, and enhanced satellite capacity.
Denmark’s Joint Arctic Command, headquartered in Nuuk, manages surveillance and sovereignty operations across Greenland. The island also guards part of the strategically significant GIUK (Greenland, Iceland, United Kingdom) Gap, where NATO monitors Russian naval movements in the North Atlantic.
Additionally, the U.S. Department of Defense operates the Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland, established after the 1951 Defense of Greenland Treaty between the U.S. and Denmark. This facility supports missile warning, defense, and space surveillance operations for both the United States and NATO.
Trump has further questioned Denmark’s historical claim to Greenland, stating: “The fact that they had a boat land there 500 years ago doesn’t mean that they own the land.”
This comment ignores Greenland’s complex history. The first humans arrived around 2,500 B.C. from present-day Canada. Viking explorer Erik the Red reached the island around 985 A.D., and Denmark’s modern colonization began in 1721 with missionary Hans Egede, with Greenland formally becoming a Danish colony in 1814. The U.S. government itself recognized Denmark’s sovereignty over Greenland more than a century ago.
Since 2009, Greenland has functioned as a self-governing territory within the Danish realm, with the constitutional right to pursue independence should its citizens choose that path through a democratic process.
As tensions over Trump’s statements continue, international law experts emphasize that the post-World War II global order has moved away from colonial acquisition toward respecting established borders and the principle of self-determination.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
The article provides a useful reality check on Trump’s claims about Greenland. The refutation of his statements about Russian and Chinese naval activity in the region by a reputable think tank researcher is particularly compelling. This underscores the need for policymaking to be grounded in facts, not political posturing.
It’s concerning to see the president make such unfounded assertions about potential threats in the Arctic region. Greenland’s strategic value is undeniable, but pursuing unilateral control through military force, as Trump has suggested, would likely backfire and damage relationships with key US allies like Denmark.
I agree, a more diplomatic and multilateral approach focused on shared security and economic interests would be a wiser path forward for the US in the Arctic. Relying on robust, impartial analysis from regional experts should take priority over inflammatory rhetoric.
While Greenland’s security is certainly important, I’m not convinced by Trump’s rhetoric about the need for US control. The island is self-governing and a territory of Denmark, a NATO ally. Perhaps a more nuanced, diplomatic approach would be warranted here.
I agree, a more measured and fact-based discussion around Greenland’s geopolitical status and security concerns would be better than inflammatory claims. Consulting regional experts like the one quoted seems like a good place to start.
The article highlights how Trump’s statements about Greenland appear to be disconnected from reality. Claims of Russian and Chinese naval activity around the island are simply not supported by the evidence, according to the experts cited. This raises questions about the president’s motivations and understanding of the issue.
Interesting article on Trump’s dubious claims about security threats in Greenland. The experts seem to be systematically refuting his assertions about Russian and Chinese military presence in the region. It would be helpful to get a more objective assessment of the strategic importance of Greenland from credible sources.
While the strategic importance of Greenland is clear, Trump’s approach to this issue seems counterproductive. Dismissing the expert assessments and pushing for unilateral US control will likely only heighten tensions and undermine cooperation with key allies like Denmark. A more nuanced, multilateral strategy would serve US interests better in the long run.