Listen to the article
U.S. President Donald Trump has reignited controversy over Greenland by making American acquisition of the strategic Arctic island a stated priority for his second term. In recent statements, Trump has suggested the possibility of using military force to take control of the self-governing Danish territory, while claiming that if the United States doesn’t acquire Greenland, it will fall under Chinese or Russian influence.
Trump’s statements about foreign military presence around Greenland have raised eyebrows among experts and locals alike. The president has repeatedly claimed that “Russian destroyers, Chinese destroyers, and Russian submarines” surround the island, presenting this as evidence of imminent foreign occupation.
However, Arctic security specialists have thoroughly debunked these assertions. Andreas Østhagen, research director for Arctic and ocean politics at Norway’s Fridtjof Nansen Institute, stated bluntly: “That statement makes no sense in terms of facts. There are no Russian and Chinese ships all over the place around Greenland.”
Experts note that Russian naval operations typically concentrate in the Barents Sea near Scandinavia, while both Russia and China maintain a presence in the Bering Sea south of Alaska—not surrounding Greenland. Lin Mortensgaard from the Danish Institute for International Studies acknowledged that while Russian submarines likely operate in parts of the vast Arctic region, there are no surface vessels near Greenland.
Greenland’s own government officials have contradicted Trump’s claims. When asked about the alleged Chinese and Russian vessels, Greenland’s business minister Naaja Nathanielsen responded: “Not that we are aware of.” She added that while Russia and China have interests in the Arctic, “we don’t detect an actual threat.”
Local Greenlanders have expressed similar skepticism. Lars Vintner, a heating engineer in Nuuk who regularly goes sailing and hunting, told reporters he has never encountered Russian or Chinese ships. “The only Chinese I see is when I go to the fast food market,” he remarked.
Trump has also downplayed Denmark’s military capabilities in Greenland, claiming their defense consists of merely “two dog sleds.” This characterization grossly misrepresents Denmark’s military presence and strategic commitments in the region.
Denmark’s Sirius Dog Sled Patrol is indeed a critical elite naval unit that conducts long-range reconnaissance in Greenland’s harsh terrain, but it represents only one component of a sophisticated defense structure. Steven Lamy, an international relations professor specializing in Arctic security at the University of Southern California, explained that specialized transportation like dog sleds is necessary in the Arctic: “There are no highways… You can’t basically get in a car or a Bradley vehicle or tank or anything and go up there.”
Denmark maintains several surface patrol ships and surveillance aircraft in the region. In 2023, the Danish government announced a $2.3 billion agreement to strengthen its military presence around Greenland and the North Atlantic, including three new Arctic naval vessels, additional long-range surveillance drones, and enhanced satellite capacity.
Denmark’s Joint Arctic Command, headquartered in Greenland’s capital Nuuk, oversees surveillance, sovereignty enforcement, and military defense of Greenland and the Faroe Islands. Additionally, the U.S. Department of Defense operates Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland, established under a 1951 defense treaty, which supports missile warning, defense, and space surveillance operations for both the U.S. and NATO.
Trump has also questioned Denmark’s historical claims to Greenland, suggesting that a boat landing “500 years ago doesn’t mean that they own the land.” This statement misrepresents Greenland’s complex settlement history, which dates back to about 2,500 B.C. when the first humans arrived from what is now Canada.
Denmark’s modern colonization began in 1721 with missionary Hans Egede, and Greenland formally became a Danish colony in 1814. The United States recognized Denmark’s sovereignty over Greenland more than a century ago. Since 2009, Greenland has operated as a self-governing territory within the Danish kingdom, with the right to independence if local voters choose that path.
International relations experts emphasize that modern international law has evolved significantly from colonial-era land grabs. As Ulrik Pram Gad from the Danish Institute for International Studies noted, “We shouldn’t just grab and go to war. Rather, it should be peoples who have their self-determination.”
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
The idea of the U.S. trying to acquire Greenland through military force is extremely concerning and would likely have major geopolitical consequences. We should be focusing on strengthening international cooperation and stability in the Arctic, not making unilateral claims of dominance.
It’s concerning to see the President making such bold claims about military threats in the Arctic without any apparent basis in reality. Maintaining stability and cooperation in the region should be the priority, not stoking fears of conflict.
This seems like another instance of Trump making unfounded claims about Greenland and security threats. While the Arctic is strategically important, the experts quoted suggest his assertions about Russian and Chinese naval activity are simply not accurate.
Agreed. Spreading misinformation about foreign military presence is irresponsible and could needlessly escalate tensions in the region. We need to rely on facts and expert analysis, not unsubstantiated rhetoric from political figures.
Greenland’s strategic location is undoubtedly important, but Trump’s assertions about foreign naval activity around the island seem to be completely unfounded. We need sober, evidence-based analysis to guide policy in the Arctic, not political grandstanding.
While the strategic importance of the Arctic is undeniable, Trump’s claims about the security situation around Greenland seem greatly exaggerated. I hope policymakers will rely on rigorous analysis from security experts rather than unsubstantiated rhetoric.
Agreed. Factual, nuanced assessments of the regional dynamics are crucial, especially when it comes to such a sensitive geopolitical issue. Inflammatory rhetoric and unilateral posturing are more likely to create problems than solve them.
While the Arctic is a geopolitically sensitive region, the experts quoted make it clear that Trump’s claims about Russian and Chinese military presence around Greenland are simply not accurate. Policymakers would do well to rely on rigorous analysis, not unsubstantiated rhetoric.
The idea of the U.S. trying to acquire Greenland through military force is deeply concerning. Greenland is an autonomous territory of Denmark, and such an action would be a serious violation of international law and norms.
Absolutely. Any attempts to forcibly take control of Greenland would be extremely destabilizing and could have major geopolitical ramifications. We should be working to strengthen international cooperation in the Arctic, not unilaterally asserting dominance.