Listen to the article
The U.S. mail-in voting system has once again become a focal point of political debate, as former President Donald Trump renewed his criticisms of postal balloting during a White House event Thursday. Despite the long-established practice being widely used across the country without significant issues, Trump claimed that mail-in voting should be eliminated.
“There would be no mail-in ballots. Very important,” Trump stated while discussing the Republicans’ SAVE America Act, which recently passed the House. “We’re the only country in the world that does a system like we do. We’re the only country in the world that has mail-in ballots. The way we do this is unbelievable. It guarantees cheating.”
These assertions, however, contradict established facts about both domestic and international voting practices. Mail-in voting has been implemented successfully across the United States for decades, with both Republican and Democratic-led states establishing secure systems that millions of Americans rely on to cast their ballots.
The practice gained even greater prominence during the 2020 election when the COVID-19 pandemic prompted many states to expand mail-in options to reduce in-person gatherings at polling places. Despite increased scrutiny, post-election audits and court challenges found no evidence of widespread fraud or irregularities associated with mail-in ballots.
Contrary to Trump’s claim that the United States is unique in offering postal voting options, numerous democracies worldwide successfully employ similar systems. Countries including Australia, Canada, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Germany, and many others allow various forms of postal voting, often with long-established protocols to ensure security and accuracy.
Election security experts point out that mail-in voting systems typically include multiple verification measures, such as signature matching, ballot tracking, and secure return envelopes. These safeguards have proven effective at preventing the kind of widespread fraud Trump has repeatedly alleged without providing substantiating evidence.
The SAVE America Act, which passed the House along party lines, contains provisions that would significantly restrict mail-in voting options. Critics argue these restrictions could disproportionately affect voters who face challenges reaching polling places, including elderly citizens, people with disabilities, rural voters, and those with inflexible work schedules.
State election officials from both parties have consistently defended their mail-in voting systems. Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Hawaii, and Utah conduct their elections primarily through mail, with voter participation rates typically exceeding the national average and minimal documented instances of fraud.
The debate over mail-in voting reflects broader partisan divides regarding election administration in the United States. While Republicans have increasingly advocated for stricter voting regulations citing security concerns, Democrats generally support expanding access through options like mail-in ballots, arguing that such measures increase participation in the democratic process without compromising integrity.
Political analysts note that Trump’s opposition to mail-in voting began to intensify in early 2020 as the COVID-19 pandemic prompted states to expand postal voting options. His continued focus on the issue suggests it will remain a contentious topic leading into future elections.
Meanwhile, election administration experts continue to emphasize that the U.S. voting system, including its mail-in components, remains fundamentally secure. They point to the decentralized nature of American elections—managed by thousands of local jurisdictions rather than a single national authority—as providing natural safeguards against large-scale manipulation.
As the SAVE America Act moves to the Senate, the debate over mail-in voting policies is expected to continue, highlighting fundamental differences in how the major political parties approach election administration and voting access in the United States.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
It’s concerning to see a former president making false claims about a fundamental democratic process like voting. Mail-in ballots have been used successfully in the US for a long time, with multiple security measures in place. Voters deserve accurate, fact-based information.
It’s important for political leaders to provide factual information, not spread misinformation that could undermine trust in the electoral process. Mail-in voting has been used successfully in the US for decades, with robust security measures in place. Voters deserve the truth.
While some countries may not use mail-in voting, that doesn’t mean the US system is inherently flawed or prone to cheating. The evidence shows mail-in voting can be implemented securely. Voters should be able to choose the method that works best for them.
Exactly. Just because the US does something differently doesn’t make it wrong. What matters is that the system is secure and accessible for all eligible voters.
It’s concerning to see Trump making false claims about mail-in voting, which is a well-established and secure practice in the US. The facts show that mail-in voting has been used effectively for decades, not just in the 2020 election. Voters should have reliable information about their voting options.
Agreed. Trump’s statements contradict the evidence and undermine public trust in the electoral process. It’s important that leaders provide truthful information, not spread misinformation that could discourage voter participation.
Mail-in voting is a convenient and safe option for many Americans. While some concerns around security are understandable, the evidence shows the system works well and has safeguards in place. Dismissing it entirely is not supported by the facts.
Absolutely. Numerous studies have found very low rates of fraud in mail-in voting. Discouraging this method seems more like a political tactic than a genuine concern for election integrity.