Listen to the article
Justice Department Releases Thousands of Epstein Documents with Trump References
The U.S. Justice Department has released tens of thousands of additional documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, including multiple mentions of President Donald Trump, though the massive document dump added little new revelatory information about the late financier and convicted sex offender.
This latest release represents the most voluminous disclosure so far and comes after sustained public pressure for transparency into the government’s investigations of Epstein. Many Trump references in the files come from news clippings, though notably the documents include an email from a federal prosecutor highlighting flights Trump took on Epstein’s private jet during the 1990s.
The two men maintained a friendship for years before a falling out. To date, Trump has not been accused of wrongdoing in connection with Epstein. The Justice Department issued a statement noting that some documents contain “untrue and sensationalist claims” about Trump that were made shortly before the 2020 election.
In a January 2020 email, an assistant U.S. attorney from the Southern District of New York noted that flight records showed Trump was on Epstein’s jet “many more times than previously has been reported (or that we were aware).” The prosecutor flagged these travel records because they didn’t want any surprises to emerge later in investigations.
According to the email, Trump was listed as a passenger on at least eight flights between 1993 and 1996. On at least four of those flights, Epstein’s co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell was also present. One 1993 flight showed only Trump and Epstein as passengers. Another flight listed Epstein, Trump, and a redacted 20-year-old individual. Two other flights included women whose names were redacted but who were identified as potential witnesses in the Maxwell case.
The White House responded by pointing to the Justice Department’s statement emphasizing that Monday’s release contained some “unfounded and false” claims against the president that were submitted just before the 2020 election. The department specifically questioned a document styled as a letter from Epstein to Larry Nassar, the convicted sports doctor, noting it was processed three days after Epstein’s death.
The documents also reveal that Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Florida was served with a subpoena in 2021 for employment records. This disclosure emerged in an email chain between Southern District of New York lawyers and an attorney representing the Trump Organization discussing someone whose name was redacted.
Speaking at an unrelated event at Mar-a-Lago, Trump criticized the release, characterizing it as a distraction from Republican accomplishments. “What this whole thing is with Epstein is a way of trying to deflect from the tremendous success that the Republican Party has,” Trump said. He expressed frustration about photos of famous people with Epstein, arguing that many innocently met him years ago and are now being implicated by association.
The documents also mention other high-profile figures including former President Bill Clinton, Michael Jackson, and Diana Ross. The Justice Department emphasized that mere inclusion of someone’s name or image in the files does not imply wrongdoing.
The release has also reignited attention on Britain’s former Prince Andrew, with correspondence between Maxwell and someone signing as “A” who references being at “Balmoral Summer Camp for the Royal Family” in Scotland. The writer asks about finding “new inappropriate friends” and mentions leaving “the RN” (possibly the Royal Navy, which Andrew left in 2001) and looking after “the Girls” (Andrew has two daughters).
Andrew, who has been stripped of his royal titles amid the Epstein scandal, has repeatedly denied committing any crimes, including allegations by Virginia Giuffre that she was trafficked by Epstein and had sex with Andrew when she was 17.
Monday’s document release—nearly 30,000 pages—was the largest yet. Trump had tried for months to keep the records sealed before eventually signing legislation mandating their release. The cache includes news clippings, emails, and surveillance videos from the New York jail where Epstein died by suicide in 2019.
Despite the volume of documents, critics including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer argue that significant information remains withheld. Schumer noted that the files still leave “more questions than answers,” pointing to a 2019 FBI email mentioning 10 people under investigation as possible co-conspirators but with few details provided.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
The connections between Trump and Epstein revealed in these documents are certainly concerning and warrant further investigation. However, it’s important to maintain objectivity and avoid partisan narratives. The public deserves the full truth, whatever that may be.
This is a complex and nuanced case that deserves careful, impartial scrutiny. While the newly released documents suggest closer ties between Trump and Epstein than previously acknowledged, it’s important to avoid rushing to judgment or perpetuating unsubstantiated narratives. The public interest is best served by a thorough, evidence-based investigation.
This is a complex and sensitive case involving powerful public figures. It’s important to scrutinize the evidence carefully and avoid jumping to conclusions. The newly released documents seem to raise more questions than answers about Trump’s connection to Epstein.
The release of these Epstein documents is an important step towards accountability, even if the revelations about Trump are not as damning as some may have hoped. Transparency is vital, and the public should reserve judgment until all the facts are carefully examined.
The release of these Epstein documents is a positive step towards transparency, but the presence of ‘untrue and sensationalist claims’ is worrying. It’s essential that the investigation into Trump’s connections is carried out with the utmost rigor and objectivity, free from political agendas.
Trump’s criticism of the document release seems somewhat defensive. While the documents may not contain any direct bombshells, the flight logs and prosecutor’s email suggest there were closer ties between the two men than Trump has previously acknowledged.
Agreed, the extent of their relationship warrants further investigation. Transparency is crucial, even if the revelations end up being less damning than some may hope.
The Epstein case is undoubtedly a sensitive and politically charged issue. However, it’s crucial that the investigation into Trump’s connections is conducted with the highest standards of objectivity and integrity. The public deserves the truth, no matter where the evidence leads.
It’s troubling to see the government acknowledge the presence of ‘untrue and sensationalist claims’ in these documents. This underscores the need for caution and careful scrutiny of the evidence, rather than rushing to judgment based on sensationalism or political agendas.
It’s concerning to see the Justice Department acknowledge the presence of ‘untrue and sensationalist claims’ about Trump in the Epstein files. This underscores the need for rigorous fact-checking and impartial analysis of the evidence.
While the Trump-Epstein relationship may be politically charged, it’s critical that the investigation remains impartial and focused on the facts. The newly released documents raise valid questions, but the public should withhold definitive conclusions until a thorough, non-partisan analysis is complete.
This case highlights the complex web of connections between wealthy, influential individuals. While Trump may not have been directly implicated, the documents seem to indicate a closer relationship with Epstein than previously known. The public deserves answers.