Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Police Clear Nana in Self-Defense Case as Agency Files Countersuit Against Home Invader

Singer and actor Nana has taken legal action against the man who broke into her home last year and subsequently filed retaliatory claims against her. Her agency, Sublime, announced Friday that they have filed a criminal complaint for false accusation, escalating the legal battle that began with a home invasion incident in November 2025.

The complaint comes after police determined that Nana acted in legitimate self-defense during the frightening confrontation at her residence in Guri, Gyeonggi province. According to the investigation, the suspect had forcibly entered her home and threatened both Nana and her mother with a weapon while demanding money.

“The suspect showed no remorse for his alleged crimes and instead filed retaliatory charges against Nana,” Sublime stated. “He also repeatedly changed his statements and continues to make false claims.”

The agency described the suspect’s actions as “deliberate and malicious secondary victimization,” pointing to a pattern of behavior designed to further traumatize their client while attempting to evade responsibility for the original crime.

The case took an unexpected turn in December when the suspect, while in detention awaiting trial, filed a complaint alleging that Nana had injured him with a weapon during the incident. Police thoroughly investigated these claims but ultimately dismissed them, concluding that any actions Nana took were justified acts of self-defense. As a result, authorities declined to forward the case to prosecutors.

“The police decision confirmed that the suspect’s claims were unfounded,” Sublime emphasized in their statement. The agency has vowed to “pursue all possible civil and criminal measures to hold him legally accountable” for both the home invasion and the subsequent false allegations.

Industry observers note that this case highlights the unique vulnerabilities celebrities face when dealing with criminal matters. Public figures often become targets not only of crimes but also of manipulation attempts that exploit their visibility and reputation.

The suspect, whose identity has not been publicly disclosed in accordance with South Korean privacy laws, has already been indicted for the home invasion. His criminal trial began this week, with the first hearing held on Tuesday. According to court reports, he denied most of the charges against him despite the evidence presented.

Sublime expressed outrage at what they view as calculated behavior designed to weaponize Nana’s celebrity status against her. “We are deeply outraged and deplore this inhumane secondary victimization of Nana, which inflicts further harm on the victim by exploiting her celebrity status to distort facts and spread misinformation,” the agency stated.

The case has drawn significant attention within South Korea’s entertainment industry, where security concerns for celebrities have become increasingly prominent in recent years. Several high-profile stars have reported stalking incidents and home security breaches, prompting many management companies to enhance protective measures for their talents.

Nana, who first gained fame as a member of the girl group After School before successfully transitioning to acting, has received an outpouring of support from fans and industry colleagues. She has continued her professional activities throughout the legal proceedings, recently appearing at a promotional event at Lotte Department Store’s Jamsil branch in southern Seoul.

Legal experts suggest that false accusation charges can carry significant penalties in South Korea, including potential imprisonment, particularly when used to obstruct justice or retaliate against victims. The outcome of both the original home invasion trial and Nana’s countersuit will likely establish important precedents for how similar cases involving public figures are handled in the future.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

11 Comments

  1. Olivia E. Rodriguez on

    It’s troubling to see the suspect try to shift blame onto Nana after breaking into her home and threatening her and her mother. Resorting to false accusations is a despicable tactic. I’m glad the police investigation corroborated Nana’s account of acting in self-defense.

    • The agency’s decision to file a criminal complaint for false accusation seems warranted given the suspect’s pattern of changing his story. Nana deserves justice and to have her rights as a victim protected.

  2. This case highlights the challenges victims can face when trying to defend themselves. I’m glad the police recognized that Nana acted in legitimate self-defense. The suspect’s continued false claims are deplorable and I hope the courts see through his attempts to shift blame.

  3. This is a clear-cut case of a criminal trying to turn the tables on his victim. The suspect’s lack of remorse and continued false claims are concerning. I hope the courts see through his attempts to evade responsibility and rule in Nana’s favor.

  4. This is a concerning case of false accusations against the victim. It’s good that the police determined Nana acted in legitimate self-defense during the home invasion. The suspect’s actions of changing his story and filing retaliatory charges seem like an attempt to evade responsibility and further victimize her.

    • William Thompson on

      I hope the legal system will see through the suspect’s false claims and hold him accountable for the original crime. Nana should not have to suffer further trauma from this incident.

  5. It’s disturbing to see a victim like Nana have to deal with false accusations after a traumatic home invasion. I commend her agency for taking legal action to hold the suspect accountable and protect her rights. Nana should not have to suffer further victimization.

    • The suspect’s lack of remorse and shifting narratives are concerning. I hope the courts see through his attempts to evade responsibility and rule in Nana’s favor. Victims of crime deserve justice and to have their safety prioritized.

  6. James Thompson on

    This is a disturbing case of a criminal trying to turn the tables on his victim. I’m glad the police investigation supported Nana’s actions in self-defense. The suspect’s continued false claims are deplorable and I hope the courts hold him fully accountable.

  7. I’m glad the police investigation supported Nana’s actions during the home invasion. It’s appalling that the suspect would file retaliatory charges against her after the fact. Nana should not have to suffer further trauma from this incident.

    • The agency’s decision to escalate the legal battle by filing a criminal complaint for false accusation seems like the right move. Nana deserves to have her rights as a victim protected and to see the suspect held accountable.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.