Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

As the search for Nancy Guthrie intensifies, “Today” show anchor Savannah Guthrie is reportedly furious over false claims implicating her brother-in-law in her mother’s disappearance, according to former NBC colleague Megyn Kelly.

Kelly revealed on her SiriusXM program “The Megyn Kelly Show” last week that Guthrie is “livid” about unfounded allegations made by journalist Ashleigh Banfield, who claimed Tommaso Cioni was possibly being investigated in connection with the February 1 kidnapping in Tucson, Arizona.

“I have not been able to confirm that the Guthrie family wants to sue Ashleigh Banfield, but I have confirmed that Savannah is livid about that report and definitely does not suspect her or her brother-in-law,” Kelly stated on her program. “Can you blame her? I mean, of course, she loves her sister, I’m sure she loves her brother-in-law, and I’m sure she genuinely doesn’t believe they had anything to do with it.”

The controversy erupted after Banfield cited a single law enforcement source on her program claiming that Cioni, who is married to Savannah’s sister Annie Guthrie, was possibly being considered a suspect in the case. According to investigators, Cioni and Annie were the last known people to see Nancy Guthrie, having shared dinner with her the evening before she vanished.

This report came despite the Pima County Sheriff’s Office publicly clearing the family of any involvement in Nancy’s disappearance. Sheriff Chris Nanos has explicitly stated there are no persons of interest in the investigation, contradicting Banfield’s reporting.

The situation highlights the delicate balance between journalistic pursuit of breaking news and the potential damage of unverified reporting, particularly in high-profile missing persons cases. Public figures like Guthrie often face additional scrutiny during personal crises, with family matters becoming fodder for speculation.

Sources close to the situation suggest Guthrie may be contemplating legal action against Banfield for the false allegations, though Kelly noted she could not independently confirm these reports. The incident has created additional stress for the Guthrie family as they continue to cope with Nancy’s disappearance.

Nancy Guthrie has been missing since February 1, leaving her family and authorities desperately searching for answers. The Pima County Sheriff’s Office continues to investigate the case, treating it as a kidnapping based on evidence found at her residence.

Media ethics experts note that reporting based on a single unnamed source in sensitive cases like kidnappings requires extraordinary caution, particularly when implicating family members without substantial evidence. The potential reputational damage to innocent parties can be severe and lasting.

Despite Banfield’s claims being refuted by official sources, she reportedly doubled down on her reporting, creating further tension in an already fraught situation. This stance has drawn criticism from fellow journalists and media watchers who emphasize the importance of verification before publication, especially in sensitive criminal investigations.

For Savannah Guthrie, the false allegations have added another layer of distress as she continues her on-air duties at NBC’s “Today” show while simultaneously dealing with her mother’s disappearance. Network colleagues have reportedly rallied around her during this difficult time.

The case has garnered national attention not only because of Guthrie’s high profile but also due to the mysterious circumstances surrounding Nancy’s disappearance. Authorities continue to appeal to the public for information that might help locate her.

As the investigation continues, the Guthrie family remains focused on finding Nancy while dealing with the additional burden of fighting misinformation about their possible involvement in her disappearance.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

6 Comments

  1. Ava P. Jackson on

    This is a sensitive situation and I hope the authorities are able to get to the bottom of what happened. Savannah Guthrie has my sympathy – false allegations against a family member must be extremely distressing. Fingers crossed the missing woman is found safe and sound.

  2. Unfounded allegations can be incredibly damaging, especially when they involve high-profile individuals. I hope Savannah Guthrie and her family are able to get through this difficult time and that the missing woman is located safely. Responsible journalism is crucial in sensitive cases like this.

  3. As someone who follows news about mining and commodities, I’m curious to see how this story develops. While the false claims against Savannah Guthrie’s brother-in-law are concerning, the priority should be finding the missing woman. Hopefully the investigation provides some answers soon.

  4. Robert Williams on

    This is a concerning case. While it’s understandable that Savannah Guthrie would be upset by the false allegations against her brother-in-law, it’s best to let the investigation take its course. Hopefully the truth will come to light and the missing woman is found safely.

  5. Olivia F. Jackson on

    The media should be careful about spreading unconfirmed claims, especially when they involve family members of public figures. Savannah Guthrie has every right to be livid if these allegations turn out to be false. The focus should be on finding the missing woman, not fueling rumors.

    • Michael P. Davis on

      I agree, responsible journalism is crucial in cases like this. Rushing to report unverified information can do more harm than good.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.