Listen to the article
South Korean psychiatrist Oh Jin-seung found himself at the center of unexpected humor during a recent SBS television broadcast when his claim about his ancestral bloodline was publicly contradicted by historical records.
The incident occurred on the popular SBS program “My Little Old Boy,” where Oh appeared as a guest. During the broadcast, Oh confidently asserted that he was a direct descendant of the royal Joseon Dynasty, specifically claiming lineage from King Sejong the Great, the celebrated 15th-century monarch known for creating the Korean alphabet, Hangul.
“I’m from the ‘Gwangsan Oh’ clan, which means I’m a descendant of King Sejong,” Oh stated during the program, referencing one of Korea’s prominent family lineages.
The claim immediately raised eyebrows among viewers familiar with Korean history. Shortly after the broadcast, fact-checking revealed a significant historical inaccuracy in Oh’s statement. Historical records clearly show that King Sejong belonged to the royal “Yi” clan of Jeonju, not the “Oh” clan of Gwangsan that Oh claims as his heritage.
The contradiction quickly became a talking point on social media platforms, with many viewers expressing amusement at the psychiatrist’s historical misstep. Some comments pointed out the irony of a highly educated medical professional making such a basic error about Korean dynastic history.
“It’s surprising that someone with his educational background would make such an elementary mistake about Korean history,” wrote one netizen on a popular online forum. Another commented, “This shows how disconnected some people can be from their own cultural history despite claiming pride in their lineage.”
The Joseon Dynasty, which ruled Korea from 1392 to 1910, remains a central part of Korean cultural identity. The dynasty’s most celebrated ruler, King Sejong, reigned from 1418 to 1450 and is venerated for his contributions to Korean culture, science, and most notably for creating Hangul, the Korean writing system that revolutionized literacy in the country.
Historical lineage and family origins carry significant cultural weight in Korean society, where family registers (jokbo) have been meticulously maintained for centuries. Many Koreans can trace their family histories through these records, with clan associations maintaining detailed genealogical information.
The “Gwangsan Oh” clan that Oh Jin-seung belongs to is indeed one of Korea’s notable family lineages, but it has no direct connection to the Joseon royal family. The clan traces its origins to the Goryeo Dynasty period (918-1392), predating the Joseon Dynasty, and has its own distinguished history separate from the royal Yi clan.
Media experts note that this kind of historical confusion is not uncommon in entertainment programming where historical facts often take a backseat to engaging content.
“Television personalities sometimes make statements without thorough fact-checking, especially in more casual entertainment formats,” explained Kim Min-soo, a media studies professor at a Seoul university. “But when those statements involve national history, viewers tend to be more critical.”
The production team at SBS has not issued any formal correction regarding Oh’s statement, which is typical for entertainment programs where factual accuracy is not held to the same standard as news programming.
Oh Jin-seung, who has built a reputation as a mental health expert through various media appearances, has not publicly addressed the historical inaccuracy since the broadcast. His professional standing as a psychiatrist remains unaffected by what many view as a harmless, if embarrassing, historical misunderstanding.
The incident highlights the intersection of entertainment, historical knowledge, and public figures in contemporary Korean media culture, where ancestral lineage continues to hold cultural significance even as factual understanding of that history sometimes becomes blurred in popular discourse.
Verify This Yourself
Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently
Reverse Image Search
Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts
Ask Our AI About This Claim
Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis
Related Fact-Checks
See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims
Want More Verification Tools?
Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools
8 Comments
This is a fascinating story. I’m always intrigued by the ways in which people try to bolster their status or legitimacy through false claims about their heritage. The public’s laughter at the psychiatrist’s contradictory statement shows the importance of fact-checking.
I agree, the public’s reaction highlights the value of critical thinking and not simply accepting claims at face value, even from those in positions of authority. It’s a good reminder to always verify information, especially when it comes to matters of history and identity.
This is a fascinating case of someone trying to elevate their status through an unfounded claim about their ancestry. It’s interesting to see how the public reacted with laughter, underscoring the importance of verifying information, especially when it comes to matters of history and identity.
I agree, the public’s reaction highlights the value of critical thinking and not simply accepting claims from those in positions of authority. It’s a good reminder that even educated individuals can make unsupported assertions, and that we should always strive to fact-check information, no matter the source.
The psychiatrist’s false claim about his royal lineage is quite amusing. It’s a good reminder that even those in positions of authority can make unsupported assertions, and that it’s important to verify information, especially when it comes to matters of history and identity.
Wow, this is quite an amusing case of false ancestral claims. I’m curious to know more about the historical inaccuracies in the psychiatrist’s statement and how the public reacted to the contradiction.
It’s interesting to see how easily even educated individuals can make unfounded claims about their lineage. I wonder what led the psychiatrist to make such a bold statement on national television.
The psychiatrist’s false claim about his royal lineage is quite comical. It’s interesting to see how easily even educated individuals can make unsupported assertions, particularly when it comes to matters of family history and status. This serves as a good lesson in the importance of fact-checking and not taking everything at face value.