Listen to the article
In a dramatic legal reversal, boxing legend Manny Pacquiao has filed a malicious-prosecution lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court against Gabriel Rueda, a former waiter who sued him nearly a decade ago, and several law firms involved in that litigation. The suit seeks both compensatory and punitive damages for what Pacquiao’s legal team describes as years of reputational harm and millions in legal expenses.
The case stems from a 2016 lawsuit filed by Rueda, who worked as a server at Craig’s, an upscale restaurant in West Hollywood. Rueda claimed he deserved a finder’s fee for helping arrange a meeting that contributed to setting up the historic 2015 Mayweather-Pacquiao boxing match. According to the Los Angeles Times, Rueda initially demanded several million dollars, with his demands eventually escalating to as much as $42 million.
Pacquiao’s new complaint characterizes Rueda’s earlier lawsuit as entirely baseless and alleges it was pursued primarily to extract a settlement payment. The eight-division world champion’s attorneys point to critical evidence they say undermines Rueda’s entire claim.
Central to Pacquiao’s counterattack is a draft letter from May 2015 that his lawyers say was only recovered in 2023 through court-ordered forensic analysis of Rueda’s iCloud account. In that letter, Rueda reportedly wrote that he “asked for nothing in return” for his alleged assistance. This statement directly contradicts the premise of his multimillion-dollar lawsuit.
The complaint further alleges that Rueda already received compensation in the form of a ticket to the historic Mayweather-Pacquiao bout, hotel accommodations, and approximately $10,000 for expenses. According to BoxingInsider, Pacquiao’s legal team contends these details were not disclosed during discovery despite specific requests for such information.
Perhaps most damaging to Rueda’s credibility, Pacquiao’s filing claims that text messages Rueda attributed to Pacquiao’s associates were actually copies of a widely circulated drug-cartel scam. The complaint states that after these messages were discredited, Rueda dropped the threatening-text allegations earlier this year.
Pacquiao’s attorneys didn’t hold back in their characterization of the situation, describing it as “arising from one of the most egregious abuses of the civil justice system.” The lawsuit names several legal entities that represented Rueda, including Khan Law Office, Withers Bergman, and Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht.
For Pacquiao, whose 2015 fight with Mayweather generated a record-breaking $600 million in revenue and remains the highest-grossing boxing match in history, the stakes extend beyond financial compensation. The lawsuit represents an attempt to restore his reputation after years of defending himself against what he characterizes as fabricated claims.
Legal experts note that malicious-prosecution claims face significant hurdles under California law. To prevail, Pacquiao must demonstrate that the earlier case ended in his favor, lacked probable cause, and was brought with malicious intent. Courts typically interpret these requirements strictly to avoid discouraging legitimate lawsuits.
The boxing icon’s complaint effectively transforms years of defensive litigation into an offensive legal strategy seeking both compensation for legal expenses and punitive damages against Rueda and his former legal representatives. The filing argues that delayed disclosures and numerous inconsistencies demonstrate the prior lawsuit proceeded without genuine evidentiary support.
As this legal battle unfolds in Los Angeles Superior Court, the defendants will have the opportunity to respond through standard civil procedure processes. Legal observers anticipate intense disputes over discovery practices and the handling of allegedly withheld evidence.
What began as a dispute surrounding the negotiations for one of boxing’s most lucrative matchups has evolved into a complex legal confrontation that could potentially set precedents regarding accountability in high-profile litigation against celebrities and public figures.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
14 Comments
It’s good to see Pacquiao taking a stand against these false allegations. Celebrities and public figures shouldn’t have to tolerate these kinds of attempts to extract money through the legal system. I hope the court rules in his favor and sends a strong message.
This is a prime example of why the legal system needs to do more to discourage frivolous lawsuits. Pacquiao has clearly been put through the wringer, and he deserves to have his name cleared and be compensated for the damage done to his reputation and finances.
I agree completely. The courts should take a hard line against these types of baseless claims, especially when they target public figures. Pacquiao deserves justice for the harm he’s suffered.
This lawsuit seems like a classic case of someone trying to make a quick buck off a celebrity’s success. Pacquiao is right to fight back against these baseless allegations and protect his reputation. It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out in court.
I agree. Allegations like these can be extremely damaging, even if they’re unfounded. Pacquiao is smart to go on the offensive and seek justice.
This is a prime example of why the legal system needs to be more vigilant in weeding out frivolous lawsuits. Pacquiao has clearly been put through the wringer, and he’s right to demand compensation for the damage done to his reputation and finances.
I agree completely. The courts should take a hard line against these types of baseless claims, especially when they target public figures. Pacquiao deserves justice for the harm he’s suffered.
This is a complex case, and it’ll be interesting to see how the evidence plays out. Pacquiao’s team seems confident they can prove the allegations were malicious, but Rueda may have his own side of the story. Ultimately, the court will have to weigh all the facts carefully.
You’re right, it’s important to let the legal process play out and not jump to conclusions. Both sides will have the opportunity to present their case, and the judge will need to consider all the evidence before reaching a decision. I’m curious to see how this unfolds.
Lawsuits like this are often more about money than justice. It’s good to see Pacquiao fighting back and not just rolling over. Hopefully, the court sees through Rueda’s claims and holds him accountable for the harm he’s caused.
I’m curious to learn more about the specific evidence Pacquiao’s lawyers say undermines Rueda’s claim. It’ll be important for the court to carefully examine the facts before reaching any conclusions. Reputational damage is no small thing, especially for a high-profile athlete.
Agreed. The details of the case will be crucial in determining whether Rueda’s lawsuit was truly malicious or just an opportunistic attempt to cash in. Pacquiao deserves to have his name cleared if the evidence supports his position.
Lawsuits like this can be incredibly damaging, both financially and reputationally. Pacquiao is right to fight back and seek compensation for the harm done to him. Hopefully, the court will see through Rueda’s claims and hold him accountable.
The boxing world has seen its fair share of frivolous lawsuits and shady characters trying to cash in. Kudos to Pacquiao for taking a stand and using the legal system to clear his name. This should serve as a warning to anyone considering similar tactics.