Listen to the article
Japanese officials are pushing back against a surge of misinformation on social media claiming that the government offers special financial incentives to businesses that hire foreign workers or serve foreign customers.
The false claims have gained traction as Japan approaches its February 8 Lower House election, where immigration and foreign policy have emerged as divisive campaign issues. Several candidates have incorporated these misleading assertions into their platform speeches, further amplifying the misinformation.
One widely shared falsehood suggests that companies receive government subsidies specifically for hiring foreign nationals. In reality, the labor ministry does offer a grant program, but it serves a different purpose. The program helps businesses cover costs related to integrating foreign workers, such as translating company regulations and internal documents into multiple languages.
“It is never provided solely for hiring a foreigner,” clarified a labor ministry official. The subsidy is limited to 800,000 yen (approximately $5,100) per business, regardless of how many foreign employees they have on staff.
Another false claim circulating on X (formerly Twitter) alleges that rental car companies receive government subsidies specifically for renting vehicles to foreigners. The transport ministry confirmed this is inaccurate. While they do offer partial subsidies to rental agencies, the funding covers multilingual website development and translation device installation, not the actual vehicle rentals.
“There is no program that provides a subsidy just for renting out a car,” a transport ministry representative stated.
Social media analysts note that content suggesting preferential treatment for foreigners often triggers public outrage and spreads rapidly across platforms, particularly during election seasons. This pattern was observed during last year’s Upper House election when candidates incorporated similar unverified claims into their campaign rhetoric.
The Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), which manages Japan’s official development assistance programs, has repeatedly found itself in the crosshairs of these misinformation campaigns. Last August, JICA was forced to cancel a cultural exchange initiative that designated four Japanese cities as “hometowns” for African nations after being overwhelmed by false accusations that the program would lead to mass immigration.
As the current election cycle unfolds, calls to “dismantle JICA” have resurfaced on social platforms. A senior Foreign Ministry official noted, “Since the start of the Lower House election, there has been an increase in posts critical of international cooperation.”
On January 27, a viral post on X falsely claimed: “JICA gives about 100 million yen per company just to prepare Africans to work in Japan! And all they have to do is have two people research it for a year! If you have that kind of money, you should give it to the ‘hyogaki sedai’ (ice age generation)!” This reference to Japan’s “ice age generation” invokes the cohort who struggled to find employment following the collapse of Japan’s economic bubble.
This particular post garnered over 1.7 million views by February 4, despite being factually incorrect. JICA representatives clarified that the referenced project is actually a research study examining potential overseas employment opportunities for African workers and corresponding demand in Japan.
The agency explained that the initiative aims to provide Africans with temporary work experience in Japan, allowing them to develop specialized skills before returning to contribute to their home countries’ development. Contrary to claims about funding numerous companies, JICA awarded a single contract worth approximately 80 million yen to a joint venture between two firms.
Media literacy experts warn that such misinformation risks inflaming xenophobia and complicating Japan’s efforts to address its aging population and labor shortages through measured immigration policies.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


10 Comments
The distinction between the subsidy’s purpose and how it’s being portrayed is an important one. I appreciate the labor ministry’s efforts to correct the record and provide the correct context. Fact-checking is vital, especially on sensitive policy issues.
While the false claims may be politically motivated, it’s encouraging to see the government responding with facts and transparency. Providing clarity around the subsidy program’s actual purpose is an important step in addressing the misinformation.
It’s concerning to see how easily false narratives can take hold, especially around topics like immigration that are often politically charged. I’m glad the government is proactively addressing this misinformation and setting the record straight.
It’s concerning to see false claims gaining traction on social media and being incorporated into political platforms. Fact-checking and setting the record straight is so important, especially around sensitive topics that could sway voters. Kudos to the officials for pushing back.
Interesting to see officials debunking the claim of subsidies for hiring foreign workers. It’s important to separate fact from fiction, especially on divisive topics like immigration. Transparency and accurate information are crucial leading up to elections.
This seems like a textbook example of the kind of misinformation that can spread rapidly online and get picked up by political figures. Kudos to the officials for taking the time to debunk the claims and provide the actual details. Transparency is key.
This highlights the need for reliable, trustworthy sources of information, particularly leading up to elections. Spreading misinformation, even inadvertently, can have real consequences. Glad to see the government taking steps to correct the record.
Absolutely, having authoritative sources debunk falsehoods is crucial. It helps maintain faith in the political process and prevent the spread of harmful narratives.
Good to see the government clarifying the purpose of their grant program – it’s about supporting integration and language translation, not just hiring foreigners. Seems like an effort to provide factual context around a politically-charged issue.
Yes, providing that nuanced explanation helps counter the misleading narrative. Focusing on the program’s actual intent and limitations is a constructive approach.