Nana Agradaa Apologizes to Empress Gifty After Retracting False Accusations

In a significant turn of events within Ghana’s entertainment industry, Evangelist Patricia Asiedua, commonly known as Nana Agradaa, has officially withdrawn all allegations previously made against prominent Gospel musician Empress Gifty, acknowledging that her claims were false and unfounded.

The retraction, issued on December 4, 2025, came through Agradaa’s legal team at Agyaa Asamani Law Consult, who clarified that the defamatory statements widely circulated on social media platforms in May 2025 were made “in the spur of the moment” without any factual basis.

“The allegations against Empress Gifty were untrue and should not be given any weight,” stated Richard Asare Baffour, the attorney handling the case. The formal withdrawal appears aimed at ending months of public controversy that has engulfed both public figures.

In addition to the legal retraction, Nana Agradaa extended a personal apology to Empress Gifty, expressing remorse for the damage inflicted on the singer’s reputation, career, and personal life. Her apology also acknowledged the broader impact on Gifty’s family members, friends, and professional associates who were caught in the crossfire of the public dispute.

The controversy began in May 2025 when Agradaa, reportedly amid a disagreement with Hopeson Adorye, Empress Gifty’s husband, launched a series of attacks during live broadcasts across multiple social media platforms including Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube. These broadcasts contained statements that Empress Gifty deemed defamatory, prompting her to file a lawsuit seeking 20 million Ghanaian cedis (approximately $1.7 million USD at current exchange rates) in damages.

This case highlights the growing issue of online defamation in Ghana’s entertainment industry, where social media has amplified the reach and impact of celebrity disputes. Legal experts in Accra note that defamation cases involving public figures have increased by nearly 40% over the past three years, with social media platforms being the primary vehicle for such content.

Ghana’s entertainment law community has been watching the case closely, as it represents one of the largest defamation claims in the country’s entertainment sector. The substantial damages sought by Empress Gifty reflect not only the personal harm alleged but also the commercial impact on her brand as a leading gospel musician.

Empress Gifty, who has won multiple awards for her gospel music and maintains a significant following across West Africa, has not yet publicly responded to Agradaa’s retraction. Sources close to the singer indicate she is consulting with her legal team regarding the next steps in the lawsuit.

The retraction may potentially lead to an out-of-court settlement, though neither party has confirmed such discussions. Legal analysts suggest that despite the formal apology, the substantial damage claim could still proceed if both parties cannot reach an agreement on appropriate compensation.

This case underscores the evolving legal landscape surrounding digital communication in Ghana, where the intersection of celebrity culture, social media, and defamation law remains relatively untested in courts. The Ghana Independent Broadcasters Association recently called for updated regulations addressing digital defamation, noting the challenges in policing content across international platforms.

For Nana Agradaa, formerly a traditional priestess who later rebranded as an evangelist, this represents another controversial chapter in her public life. She has previously been involved in several high-profile disputes with other religious figures and celebrities in Ghana’s entertainment space.

The legal team representing Agradaa emphasized that the retraction aims to “restore peace and correct the public record” after months of tension between the two prominent figures.