Listen to the article
Atlanta Mother and Son Convicted for False Allegations Against Houston County Deputies
A Houston County jury has found an Atlanta mother and son guilty of making false statements after they accused sheriff’s deputies of brutality during a March 2025 traffic stop on Interstate 75.
Juana Shantail Ash, 42, and her son Omar Wright, 22, were each sentenced to three years of probation and two days in the Houston County Jail following their conviction on felony charges of making false statements. Wright received an additional conviction for misdemeanor obstruction of officers.
The case originated from a traffic stop when Wright and two cousins were pulled over for driving below the speed limit in the interstate’s far left lane. Houston County Sheriff Matt Moulton confirmed that all three men were removed from the vehicle after deputies detected marijuana.
According to Houston County District Attorney Eric Edwards, the incident escalated when Wright, who was a passenger, refused to exit the vehicle after being instructed to do so by deputies. While Wright was on a FaceTime call with his mother during the traffic stop, a struggle ensued between him and the officers.
Days after the incident, Ash filed a formal complaint with Major Clay Chamber, alleging that deputies had violently beaten on the vehicle’s window with weapons, used profanity, drawn their firearms, and repeatedly tased her son while he was handcuffed and unconscious. She further claimed that officers denied her son medical attention despite his multiple health conditions.
“They were using profane language. They were absolutely violent. They were bloodthirsty. If you ask me, it was a hunt,” Ash told local media in March 2025. “Had he not been on FaceTime, I believe he would have been murdered.”
However, body camera and dashboard footage presented during the two-day trial contradicted these allegations. The video evidence showed that after detecting marijuana, deputies detained the driver and backseat passenger before approaching Wright, who remained in the passenger seat on a FaceTime call with his mother.
When Wright initially refused to exit the vehicle, deputies eventually opened the door and ordered him out. The footage shows Wright stepping out while still holding his phone. When officers attempted to secure him, he appeared to resist, prompting one deputy to deploy a taser. Deputies can be heard on the recording instructing Wright to put his hands behind his back while moving him away from traffic toward a grassy area.
During the arrest, Wright appeared to lose consciousness, leading one of his cousins to alert deputies about Wright’s heart condition. Deputies called for an ambulance and checked that he was breathing. Sheriff Moulton later stated that Wright had “faked a medical emergency,” noting that deputies could see his eyes moving despite his apparent unconsciousness.
Medical responders evaluated Wright at the scene before he was transported to Houston County Jail on charges of marijuana possession and obstruction. Deputies reportedly found less than an ounce of suspected marijuana during their search.
District Attorney Edwards said the mother and son “further misled” the local NAACP chapter, which had launched its own investigation into the incident. He specifically criticized Ash for using local media to spread “false allegations” about the deputies’ conduct.
“This case showcases a deliberate attempt to fabricate a narrative and benefit from public outrage,” Edwards said in a statement. “False accusations of police brutality do real harm. They endanger officers who serve honorably, inflame community tensions without basis, and erode confidence in legitimate claims that would deserve to be taken seriously.”
The case highlights growing tensions between law enforcement and communities concerned about police misconduct, while also raising questions about the consequences of false allegations. Law enforcement officials have increasingly relied on body camera footage to dispute claims of misconduct, as occurred in this case.
The convictions come at a time when police departments nationwide face heightened scrutiny over use-of-force incidents, making the documentation of police interactions increasingly important for both officers and the public.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
It’s good to see the justice system working as intended here. Making false statements to authorities is a serious crime that should be punished. Hopefully this serves as a deterrent against such behavior in the future.
Absolutely. Fabricating claims of police brutality is not only unethical, but can have real consequences for law enforcement’s ability to do their jobs effectively and fairly.
While I’m glad to see the justice system functioning as intended here, it’s troubling that people would go to such lengths to make false claims. This type of behavior erodes trust and makes it harder to address genuine issues.
I agree. Fabricating evidence is a serious offense that should be met with appropriate penalties. Maintaining the integrity of the legal process is essential for ensuring fair outcomes for all.
This is a concerning case of false accusations against law enforcement. While police misconduct is a serious issue, it’s important to ensure the integrity of the justice system by holding those who make false claims accountable.
Agreed. False reports undermine public trust and make it harder to address real instances of brutality or misconduct. Transparency and due process are crucial.
This case serves as a reminder of the importance of verifying facts and not rushing to judgment, even when emotive claims are made. False accusations can undermine legitimate efforts at police accountability and reform.
Absolutely. While police misconduct must be taken seriously, the justice system requires impartiality and due process. Holding all parties accountable, regardless of the nature of the allegations, is crucial.
It’s disheartening to see people abusing the justice system in this way. False accusations not only undermine public trust, but also make it harder to address real instances of police brutality or misconduct.
Exactly. Accountability should work both ways – law enforcement must be held to high standards, but those who make false claims should also face consequences. Balanced, fact-based approaches are key.
It’s discouraging to see people making false claims, especially when they involve serious allegations against law enforcement. This kind of behavior erodes public trust and makes it harder to address real issues.
Agreed. False accusations are counterproductive and can distract from genuine efforts to improve policing and community relations. Accountability should go both ways.
While allegations of police misconduct must always be taken seriously, this case highlights the importance of verifying the facts before rushing to judgment. The conviction of the mother and son suggests the deputies’ actions were justified.
You make a fair point. Due process is essential, even when emotive claims are made. Jumping to conclusions without evidence can backfire and undermine legitimate efforts at police accountability.
This case highlights the importance of due process and not rushing to judgment based on emotive claims. While police misconduct is a serious issue, fabricating evidence undermines efforts to address it effectively.
Well said. Maintaining the integrity of the justice system requires holding all parties accountable, regardless of the nature of the allegations. Transparency and impartiality are crucial.