Listen to the article
In a forceful rebuttal issued Saturday, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) categorically denied allegations published by The Washington Post that claimed the state-owned insurance giant’s investment decisions were influenced by external factors, particularly regarding investments in the Adani Group.
“The allegations leveled by the Washington Post that the investment decisions of LIC are influenced by external factors are false, baseless, and far from truth,” LIC stated in an official communiqué released to address the controversy.
The dispute stems from an investigative report published by the American newspaper on Friday, October 24, 2025, which alleged that approximately $3.9 billion had been channeled into Adani Group companies through LIC as part of what the paper described as a government-crafted aid plan to address mounting debts within the conglomerate.
LIC’s statement firmly rejected the existence of any such directive or planning document. “No such document or plan as alleged in the article has ever been prepared by LIC, which creates a roadmap for infusing funds by LIC into the Adani group of companies,” the insurer emphasized.
The corporation, which manages assets worth trillions of rupees and is one of India’s most trusted financial institutions, detailed its investment decision-making process to counter the allegations. According to LIC, all investment decisions are made by its board of directors following approved policies and thorough due diligence protocols.
“Department of Financial Services or any other body does not have any role in such decisions,” the statement clarified, directly addressing insinuations of government interference in its investment strategy.
LIC suggested the American newspaper’s report appeared designed to undermine confidence in the company’s governance structure. The insurer characterized the allegations as being made with “intentions to prejudice the well-settled decision-making process” and aimed at “tarnishing the reputation” and market image of the corporation in India.
“LIC has ensured highest standards of due diligence and all its investment decisions have been undertaken in compliance with extant policies, provisions in the Acts and regulatory guidelines, in the best interest of all its stakeholders,” the company added, emphasizing its commitment to regulatory compliance and fiduciary responsibility.
The controversy touches on sensitive issues in India’s financial landscape, where the relationship between state-owned enterprises and large private conglomerates often draws scrutiny from opposition parties and international observers. LIC, which went public in 2022 in what was then India’s largest-ever IPO, has faced questions about its investment strategies and independence from government influence since its listing.
The Adani Group has similarly denied any involvement in a government-directed funding scheme as alleged by the Washington Post. The conglomerate, led by billionaire Gautam Adani, has previously faced intense scrutiny following a January 2023 report by short-seller Hindenburg Research that triggered a massive sell-off in Adani stocks and raised questions about the group’s debt levels and corporate governance.
Financial market analysts note that the controversy comes at a sensitive time for both LIC and the Adani Group. For LIC, maintaining investor confidence in its autonomous decision-making is crucial for its stock performance and reputation as India’s premier insurance provider with over 250 million policyholders. For the Adani Group, any suggestion of requiring government assistance could potentially affect investor sentiment toward its various listed entities.
The Washington Post has yet to respond to LIC’s denial of its reporting. The newspaper had claimed in its investigative piece that the Indian government had crafted a financial rescue plan for the Adani Group as debts mounted across its portfolio of companies spanning energy, ports, and infrastructure sectors.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
7 Comments
This is a complex issue, and LIC’s response indicates they are taking it very seriously. Transparency around investment decisions, especially for a state-owned entity, is crucial. I’ll be interested to see if any additional information comes to light.
LIC’s rebuttal seems quite comprehensive, but I’m curious to see if any additional information emerges that sheds more light on their investment decision-making process. Transparency is key, especially for a state-owned entity managing such a large portfolio.
This story highlights the complexities involved in managing a large investment portfolio. While the allegations are serious, LIC’s detailed response suggests there may be more to this than meets the eye. I’ll be following this closely to see how it unfolds.
While the allegations are serious, LIC’s strong denial suggests there may be more to this story. I’ll be keeping an eye out for any further developments that provide more clarity on their investment practices and decision-making.
Interesting to see LIC push back on these claims. Transparency around investment decisions is important, but there may be more to the story than meets the eye. Looking forward to hearing more details on their due diligence process.
As a major investor, LIC’s investment strategy is closely watched. Their rebuttal seems quite strong, but I’d be curious to learn more about their investment review process and any potential conflicts of interest, real or perceived.
Allegations of political influence in investment decisions are always concerning. However, LIC’s firm denial suggests there may be more nuance to this situation. I hope further scrutiny will shed light on their decision-making framework.