Listen to the article
As Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations have intensified nationwide, local police departments are increasingly finding themselves caught in a web of misinformation. Across the country, law enforcement agencies are being forced to publicly address false claims about ICE activity in their jurisdictions, often stemming from routine police operations mischaracterized on social media.
The trend has accelerated over the past year, with numerous departments having to debunk viral rumors. In January 2026, Appleton, Wisconsin police had to clarify that a widely shared video purportedly showing ICE agents actually depicted a multi-jurisdictional drug task force operation. Three months earlier in Bethel, Connecticut, authorities found themselves explaining that social media posts about ICE detentions were actually referring to a drug search warrant execution.
Similar scenarios played out in Herndon, Virginia, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin in February 2025, where false claims of ICE collaborations prompted swift denials from local departments. In Milwaukee’s case, the situation was particularly concerning as it involved a fabricated “news release” claiming police were working with federal immigration authorities.
“These incidents represent a growing operational challenge for local departments,” explains Robert Tornabene, a retired law enforcement Bureau Chief with over 27 years of experience. “How agencies respond—particularly the language they use and how quickly they address false claims—directly impacts public trust.”
Law enforcement communications experts note that departments successful in managing these situations share common approaches. They issue direct, unambiguous denials without hedging phrases like “to our knowledge” when facts are confirmed. The strongest statements clearly separate local policing functions from federal immigration enforcement.
“Naming the fear is also critical,” Tornabene observes. “Departments that explicitly acknowledge community concerns tend to diffuse tension faster without validating the misinformation itself.”
The stakes are particularly high in communities with significant immigrant populations, where rumors of ICE activity can cause widespread panic, keep children home from school, and erode trust in local police. When Bridgeport, Connecticut faced social media rumors about immigration enforcement at schools in January 2025, it required a joint statement from police, school officials, and the mayor’s office to calm the situation.
Communications experts recommend a rapid response framework for agencies facing these challenges. The first 15 minutes should focus on internal verification—confirming exactly who was operating, where, and under what authority. Within 15-30 minutes, departments should issue a holding statement that definitively addresses who was not involved.
“Don’t wait for perfect details,” advises Tornabene. “The primary goal at this stage is stopping fear from spreading.”
Between 30-45 minutes after becoming aware of false claims, agencies should expand their communication to provide operational context, acknowledge community concerns, and reaffirm department policies regarding immigration enforcement. The final phase involves monitoring comments and media inquiries, correcting additional false claims as necessary.
Law enforcement agencies have found certain language patterns particularly effective. Successful statements provide simple operational context—explaining what was actually happening rather than just what wasn’t happening. For example, “The activity was a domestic violence sweep involving local officers” provides clarity that vague statements cannot.
Channel control also proves crucial, with effective communications directing people to official sources for updates. This subtly undermines rumor sources without explicitly calling them out.
The phenomenon highlights the evolving nature of police communication in a social media era. What might have previously been a minor operational misunderstanding can now spiral into a community crisis within minutes if not addressed properly.
“Rapid, precise and empathetic communication is no longer optional for police departments—it’s a core operational responsibility,” Tornabene emphasizes. “Agencies that verify quickly, respond decisively, and communicate with clarity not only stop misinformation from spreading but also demonstrate their commitment to transparency and community well-being.”
As federal immigration enforcement continues to be a politically charged issue, local law enforcement agencies will likely face ongoing challenges in distinguishing their operations from ICE activity. Those prepared with communication strategies and template responses will be best positioned to maintain community trust during these sensitive situations.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
20 Comments
It’s alarming how easily misinformation can go viral these days, even when it comes to serious law enforcement matters. Kudos to the police departments for quickly dispelling these false claims – maintaining public confidence is so important.
I agree. The fabricated ‘news release’ in Milwaukee is particularly troubling. Authorities need robust strategies to rapidly identify and correct such blatantly false information before it causes further harm.
This is an important issue that deserves close attention. Spreading misinformation about law enforcement activities can undermine public trust and hinder effective policing. I’m glad to see local departments taking proactive steps to address these false claims head-on.
Agreed. Transparency and clear communication from authorities are crucial in these situations. Debunking viral rumors quickly can help prevent further confusion and damage.
This is a complex issue that requires a nuanced approach. While it’s important to address false claims, care must be taken to avoid escalating tensions or appearing heavy-handed. Ongoing dialogue and community engagement will be key.
Good point. Balancing transparency and sensitivity will be crucial as police departments work to debunk misinformation. Building trust through open communication and collaboration with community stakeholders should be a top priority.
It’s concerning to see how easily false narratives can gain traction on social media, especially around sensitive topics like immigration enforcement. Rigorous fact-checking and swift response from local police are essential to counter this trend.
Absolutely. In the age of instant information sharing, law enforcement must be vigilant and prepared to provide accurate, timely updates to the public. Rebuilding trust is critical when dealing with these kinds of false alarms.
Misinformation can have serious consequences, especially when it comes to law enforcement activities. I’m glad to see the Disinformation Commission taking a proactive stance in providing guidance to help local authorities respond effectively.
Agreed. Addressing false claims head-on, while maintaining a measured and compassionate approach, is essential for preserving public trust and ensuring the safety of all community members.
This is a growing challenge for law enforcement – having to divert resources to debunk social media rumors instead of focusing on core duties. Improved coordination between agencies and better digital literacy could help address the problem.
That’s a good point. Authorities need to find efficient ways to monitor and quickly correct misinformation before it gains traction. Public education on identifying reliable sources would also be beneficial.
The rise of false claims about ICE activity is a concerning trend that can sow fear and distrust within communities. I’m glad to see the guidelines being developed to help police departments navigate these situations effectively.
Absolutely. Establishing clear protocols for responding to misinformation is an important step in maintaining public safety and trust. Timely, factual communication from authorities is essential in these cases.
Interesting to see how misinformation spreads so quickly on social media these days. It’s good that local police are proactively addressing false claims to maintain public trust. Fact-checking is crucial to combat the spread of disinformation.
Absolutely. Transparency and clear communication from authorities help counter the rise of online rumors and conspiracy theories. Verifying information sources is key to staying informed.
This highlights the challenges of policing in the social media age. While the internet has democratized information, it has also enabled the rapid spread of misinformation. Strengthening digital literacy and public-police cooperation could help address these issues.
The spread of false claims about ICE operations is concerning, as it can erode public trust in law enforcement. I’m glad to see departments taking proactive steps to address these rumors head-on. Transparency is crucial in these sensitive situations.
These examples highlight the challenge of maintaining public order and safety in the face of rapidly spreading misinformation. I commend the police departments for taking proactive steps to dispel the false claims and reassure their communities.
Agreed. It’s crucial that local authorities remain transparent and responsive when confronted with misleading narratives. Restoring public confidence is key to effective law enforcement, especially on sensitive issues.