Listen to the article
Google Removes Article Exposing AI Gambling Network After Questionable Copyright Claim
Google has removed a Search Engine Land article from its search results following a copyright complaint that appears to be fraudulent. The article, published on March 26 and titled “Report: Clickout Media turned news sites into AI gambling hubs,” disappeared from search results after a DMCA takedown notice was filed just one day after publication.
The complaint, submitted on March 27 by an entity identifying itself only as “US Webspam,” claimed Search Engine Land had copied content “word for word” and used proprietary images without permission. The notice alleged multiple attempts had been made to resolve the issue amicably before filing the complaint.
However, several inconsistencies cast doubt on the legitimacy of the takedown request. The Search Engine Land article contained no images whatsoever, directly contradicting the complaint’s central claim. A review of the article’s content shows no evidence of copied text, and Search Engine Land editors report they received no communication or outreach before the DMCA filing.
This isn’t an isolated incident. The Press Gazette, which published the original investigation into Clickout Media’s practices, has also had its content removed following a similar DMCA complaint.
The original reporting by both publications detailed allegations that Clickout Media was acquiring expired or previously established domains to publish AI-generated gambling content, potentially exploiting the domains’ existing authority and reputation in search engines.
Google’s standard procedure when receiving DMCA complaints is to remove the flagged content while allowing publishers to file counter-notices. The company has not commented specifically on this case. Such removals can take weeks or longer to resolve, effectively suppressing legitimate reporting during that time.
The incident has drawn significant attention from digital marketing professionals and SEO experts. Glenn Gabe, a prominent digital marketing consultant, expressed surprise at Google’s approval of the takedown, noting on Twitter: “I’m surprised this was approved by Google… I’ve seen them come back with rejected DMCA notices when it was clear the site was infringing copyright. This is a BS DMCA takedown that doesn’t even make sense.”
Other industry figures have voiced concern about the apparent weaponization of copyright claims to suppress legitimate journalism, particularly reporting that investigates potential search engine manipulation or spam tactics.
Digital marketing analyst Gagan Ghotra highlighted the issue on social media, noting that “a totally irrelevant site has DMCAed Search Engine Land’s reporting page about ClickOut Media spamming Google’s search results,” adding that the “DMCA request was accepted by Google and now this URL from Search Engine Land isn’t showing up in search.”
The case illustrates a growing concern in digital publishing: the vulnerability of legitimate journalism to bad-faith copyright claims designed to suppress unflattering coverage. When DMCA takedown processes are abused, it can create a chilling effect on reporting about controversial business practices or potentially manipulative SEO strategies.
Search Engine Land, owned by Semrush, has indicated it is monitoring whether additional coverage of this issue—including potentially this article itself—might also become targets of similar takedown attempts.
As the situation unfolds, it highlights the complex balance between protecting intellectual property rights and preserving the integrity of journalism that serves the public interest by investigating potential abuses of digital platforms.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


8 Comments
This is a concerning case of apparent abuse of DMCA takedown notices to censor critical reporting. If the claims in the article are true, Google should thoroughly investigate the legitimacy of this copyright complaint before removing content.
Agreed. The lack of communication from the complainant and the contradictory claims about copied content and images raise red flags. Transparency and due diligence are crucial here.
As an investor tracking developments in the tech and media spaces, I’ll be watching this case closely. Transparency around content moderation policies and the ability to appeal questionable takedowns are crucial for maintaining trust in online platforms.
This is a concerning precedent. If tech companies are too quick to remove content based on dubious copyright claims, it could have a chilling effect on investigative journalism and open discourse. Rigorous verification is essential to protect the public interest.
It’s troubling to see platforms like Google seemingly bowing to questionable copyright claims without proper verification. Maintaining the integrity of search results and protecting free speech should be top priorities.
Absolutely. This case highlights the need for clearer policies and processes to validate DMCA takedown requests, especially when they target journalism on topics of public interest.
I hope Google and other platforms will take a hard look at their DMCA procedures to ensure they aren’t being exploited to censor legitimate reporting. Upholding press freedom should be a key priority, even in the face of questionable legal claims.
As someone interested in the technology and media industries, I’m curious to learn more about the details behind this incident. Was there any prior history between the parties involved? What are the potential implications for the broader ecosystem?